![]() |
Here's a curious Internet question?
So I know these days they are as common, but who was the 1st site to use the banner size 468x60 and why didn't they just make it 470px? :upsidedow
|
Hehe, nice question :))
|
I have wondered that so many times.
|
He made it 468 because that was the width of his site at the time.
|
468x60 fit the size of websites back in the day, while also leaving room for a small sidebar without scrolling.
A 468x60 banner was massive on on a 640 (or even 800) width display. Now 468 is a good size to fit under your embedded flvs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I guess we need to ask someone who was with Hotwired or AT&T. I bet there's an interview around somewhere.
Google found this: Quote:
http://thelongestlistofthelongeststu...m/first66.html http://adland.tv/content/banner-ads-tenth-birthday Someone else asking the same question: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=506604 |
They loaded quicker on a 300 baud modem! LOL
|
they probably didn't know the pixel size at the time, nor did they know it would become a standard.
|
I'm guessing that the first to do this was infoseek.com or yahoo.com
|
Quote:
Good find btw!:thumbsup |
Quote:
With 640 screen you had something like 590 to work with... So with a 470 banner, that left you 120 for a side menu. |
Looks like HTML2 and HTML3 didn't have the border attribute (was done in 3.2) and so probably every image had a border on it back then.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
probably cause it ended up that way and they looked at the size later when they wanted to replace it the first time and the new one needed to fit
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc