Old useless people should be euthanized
 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...s-Warnock.html

I have a Grandmother.. she's basically legally insane (from Dementia) and does not know who she is, where she is, or even who her own daughters are. Dementia is even worse then Alzheimer's because they can live till 100 while being completely insane, annoying and useless.

Why should a person like that be allowed to live? They are not who they were born anymore. They're just a useless meaningless shell and a burden to everyone.

If you don't even know that you're alive... why be allowed to live?

back once again with the ill behaviour!!

Strong opinion as always!

You photoshop tits and asses all day, that's pretty useless in someone else's point of view as well ...

Everyone is an individual, not for me to say someone should live or die or is still useful

Sometimes I do penis's too.

I think the line should be drawn. If you can still post on GFY you still provide a service. LOL

This is a very touchy subject but quite simple to resolve - in theory.

The main problem stems from our Western Religions that place the Human at the center of creation. In other words, our morals and ethics have us as the reason and ultimate goal of creation. With that in mind, human life/human dignity is above everything else on this planet. Nothing even comes close on the balance.

Example: choosing between killing an 100 year old demented person or 10 African lions. Most people would kill the lions without even thinking about it.

Eventually I believe things will change, and just like we realized that the Earth isn't the center of the universe, we will also realize that we are not the center of life.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

there was this book i was reading that had the same idea. but the book was using the idea of euthanization as a way to bring about medical costs as a whole

ie

this is the old peoples mess, why do i have to pay for their fuck ups AND their medical?

I thought this was going to be about Markham.

:(

I hope you will get many sig clicks man...
.

http://mimg.ugo.com/200710/3009/logans_run_palm.JPG

There is no sanctuary, runner.

You are right, that's what people were doing a few thousand years ago; I dare to believe that our society has evolved since then, but you certainly haven?t ?.. I think me might have to euthanize you

why not kill all mentally handicapped people while your at it...

i think we need to re-evaluate assisted suicide and DNR laws.

Let people put in the wills "hey if i cant remember my name and i act like a fucking 2 year old clown who shits and pisses himself ..just go ahead and put me to sleep"

Knock off handicapped people period. How dare they ask for ramps at cross-walks?

Hilarious movie, if you haven't seen it ;) All the old people get turned into controllable zombies iirc :P

What a lot of people don't know is that the powers that be are already 'pushing old people towards death'. They keep these things to themselves.

Old people's flu vaccine, that's what it's for, to push them a step further towards heaven or hell. Old people's immune systems don't react to vaccines, that should give the game away that there's other stuff being put inside to 'push' the old people out of this world

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024624_fl...#ixzz1DZmxg3b0

Some research suggests that people who received the flu vaccine each year for 3 to 5 years had 10 times greater chance of developing Alzheimer's disease than people who did not have any flu shots.

They'll do what they want whether you like it or not, they will prepare a Myth for your consumption if necessary

Well, let's not stop there. Let's get rid of everyone who's detrimental to society. Gays, muslims, blacks (oh -- they're ok now, right?), homeless, etc. Then we'll have a good world. :)

As long as they aren't living on tax dollars who the fuck cares? If they are paying for themselves to be in a home or their family is or some charitable organization is... who cares? What effect does it have on you exactly?

However, if they're living off the system then... I vote "final 'flu' shot" FTW! LOL

I certainly hope somebody gives ME one if I ever become like that...

Maybe the demented young should be included.

Would thin GFY out no problems. LOL

Stick anybody that writes LOL on the bonfire too please.

how about useless webmasters

HAHA! That's really funny, why don't you take the OP's link, add this witty commentary from you and post it on another porn forum?

That'd be super funny!

so long as they don't drive a car, I dont give a shit

"About the author
Sheryl is a kinesiologist, nutritionist and holistic practitioner."


Natural News looks like a reliable, unbiased and highly scientific source for your claims.

its euthanasia day!

By your way of thinking Ronald Reagan should have been euthanized after his first term of presidency...well maybe during his first term of presidency;)

It's actually come from Hugh Fudenberg, MD, the world's leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals). There's more info below
-------------------------
I'd like to repeat the Flu/Alzheimer's connection that so many of you have asked about. According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD, the world's leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals), if an individual has had five consecutive flu shots his/her chances of getting Alzheimer's Disease is ten times higher than if they had one, two or no shots. I asked Dr. Fudenberg why this was so and he said it was due to the mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot (and some childhood shots). The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction. Is that why Alzheimer's is expected to quadruple? Notes: Recorded from Dr. Fudenberg's speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September, 1997. Quoted with permission. Alzheimer's to quadruple statement is from John's Hopkins Newsletter Nov 1998. Dr. Fudenberg's web address is www.nitrf.org.
http://www.doctorbob.com/vd--flu-shot-season.html
---------------------------

Few people are going to 'discover' the link as it would lose them too much money from old people no longer receiving vaccines and there would be huge payouts to those who have been damaged. The only things the scientists will 'discover' are the things that they've been paid to and the those are the things that will make the Pharms a lot of ca$h

Why not kill all handicaped children?
Why not kill all old people (not just the demented ones)?
why not kill all smokers? They're gonna die anyway, might as well stop them from polluting the air.
Why not kill all people with an iq below 140? Who needs stupid people anyway?
Why not just kill all bad drivers? It would make traffic a lot safer....
Why not kill all chubby children? They're just gonna end up with diabetes and no life anyway...
Why not let some Islamic fundamentalist imam decide who must die?
Why not kill all blond people? Or all redheads (they don't have a soul anyway)?
Why not kill all men between 25 and 35 who like to wear jeans?
Why not kill all people that can't dance?

Or how about we stop imposing our own morality onto others? It's simple: Every human being is master of his own body and is free to do whatever he wants with his body (or his property) as long as he doesn't cause damage to another human being (or his property). Want to be in porn? Fine, your body, your right. Want to drink beer all day? Fine, your body, your right. Want to work hard to provide for your family? Fine, your body, your right. Want to travel and see the world? Fine, your body, your right.

Want to start killing people? Well,t hat would be an act of aggression and that gives the person you are trying to kill the right to defend himself and to retaliate.

:thumbsup:thumbsup

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/...-4_681576c.jpg

you should read the writings by the guy above, as well as the transcription of his speeches, you'll find lots of things in common with him :thumbsup

btw, just as a suggestion, you could add kids (a useless burden), politicians, 99% of military and clergy, anyone that is ill or has some kind of disability, anyone that doesn't think like you, anyone that doesn't get to your supreme standards and so on. After all, they're useless as well :2 cents:

The World Health Organization - Funded by the same family as the NAZIs

The WHO tried to change the law so as we would be forced to have the so-called 'Swine Flu Jabs', fortunately it didn't work out for them last time, but they'll be back and their agenda isn't about stopping us from catching mild flu

ditto - who makes the choice?

Actuallyyyy... from what I've read of it, way back 1000's of years in history, when we all lived in mud huts, igloos, teepees, caves, and tents made of animal hides, people actually did sit the extremely old folk outside on cold nights and either froze them to death or the wolves got them.

Same with babies that didn't look 100% right. Your newborn missing a toe? Outside with it. Eyes too far apart? Too high a forehead? Leave it in the woods!


Of course humanity has evolved a long way since those ancient times. Or so I thought, til I saw this thread. :D

I don't know how is it related, specially when most of the funds comes from governments, UN, Bill Gates, World Bank, Rockefeller Foundation and so on. Anyway, I know GFY isn't the place to discuss reality when la-la-land is way funnier, so let me ask you a question: how many lives did you save in your entire life? How many lives did WHO save?

yeah, that's what I thought

PS: you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about (surprise!!!!), swine flu vaccine has saved or prevented death for HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of people, maybe you'll remember that vaccine came out to solve an epidemic burst. But no, I'm pretty sure you don't remember :Oh crap In my country all medical corporations were strongly against it until the government produced and distributed it FOR FREE. All of the sudden, all medical and insurance corporations were the biggest supporters. But of course, your views have nothing to do with what these companies PR say :1orglaugh

The media won't educate you about some things, you have to educate yourself.

Some interesting points to note

- The Rockefellers funded the Nazi eugenicists
- The Rockefellers played a big part in setting up the UN (the future World Government)
- The WHO has some good people, but the agenda which comes right from the top is to control populations. That's why they put Polysorbate 80 in the so-called 'swine flu vacine', to damage developing ovaries.

Do a few Googles and you'll quickly see that UNICEF/UN/WHO have been caught sterilizing before under the guise of vaccination. Listen to some of Rockefeller's speeches and he makes it quite clear he wants the world population at less than 1 billion and that he sees the UN/WHO playing a major role.

All the information is there for anyone who chooses to look. If this is all true, why do people not know?

David Rockefeller Quote
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war, but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in the past centuries. It is also our duty to inform the press of our convictions as to the historic future of the century." David Rockefeller 1991

http://cdn2.holytaco.com/wp-content/...n-foil-hat.jpg
OK, you convinced me and my cat. Let's kill those UN/UNICEF/WHO bastards! :ak47::BangBang::ak47::BangBang::ak47::BangBang::a k47::BangBang:

Amen to that. I'm sure the baby boomer generation did a hell of a lot more than a porn peddler.

It's the old people's fault that they had social security when it first started and worked for most of their lives? Wow..

Send your cat after Bill Gates (funder of the WHO), here's where he admits that vaccines are going to be used to lower the population

https://youtube.com/watch?v=QUCGn...eature=related

I was actually going to reply "who are 'we' to say when unsociability means death?" but I think I'll just let this quote say it for me...

Assisted suicide is one thing, euthanasia is another....

FUck you, idiot.

Perhaps start a thread called - "Young useless trolls should be euthanized"

More interesting stuff: http://briandeer.com/wakefield/hugh-fudenberg.htm

850 peer reviewed papers? Not according to pubmed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?t...gh%20Fudenberg :1orglaugh

Instead of taking your time, doing 1 minute of research, you copy paste the first result you could find on Google on this quack. :thumbsup

It's a pattern you see time and time again, as soon as you become aware of the scale of corruption within the FDA and the Pharms you learn that any studies they give you will be purely marketing and that they will have covered any problems up. A healthy nation isn't profitable, start injecting them with toxic metals the moment they come out the womb.

Here's when Bayer were caught knowingly selling HIV contaminated drugs https://youtube.com/watch?v=wg-52mHIjhs

This guy puts things into perpective https://youtube.com/watch?v=y3XlJB7J5-o

If you speak out against them they will smear and discredit you.

http://www.motifake.com/image/demoti...1253050775.jpg



ADG

Question: Let's say even through our system is way in the red, there's about $2 trillion of taxmoney per year. Let's say that every year, there are 2 million people between the age of 70-120 who are on their deathbed and even though this next part won't likely be true, hypothetically speaking, let's say that to keep these people alive for one more day costs $500,000 each per day. Would you keep any of them alive for a day or longer? How many of them? Which ones? Why spend it on them vs. spending it on people with many many years left of life to live?

So yea, this is an overblown picture, but it's sort of what comes to mind with this topic. My grandma died after having a major stroke...not immediately after, but over 2 years after. She didn't speak a single word after she had had this stroke, and while did move the slightest bit, didn't really function much except to open her mouth the slightest bit when people would feed her. She was at the hospital for most of that time then was brought home and had 24 hour care.

Fastforward 12 years and even a small fraction of the money spent on keeping her alive for that time would help my parents, siblings etc. get through this rough economy. It would hard to be "that guy" that says fuck it, let her die, but it's just one of those things that feels a bit backwards in the scope of things.

you're dealing with a guy who looks to abovetopsecret.com for health information - no joke. don't bother.

Mercola is the best, strongly recommended. Clearly one wouldn't take health information from abovetopsecret, but one could certainly follow a link from there.

Once a person becomes aware of the scale of corruptions and lies, he certainly wouldn't head to CNN, BBC or any mainstream tv channel or a newspaper to get advice on an injection that's making companies billions of dollars. Basic common sense!

The reason I'm so passionately anti-vaccine is because a vaccine took down my elder sister and left her in a total mess for the rest of her life. She was perfectly healthy up until she received the vaccine at the age of 8, then she had the vaccine, downhill from there. People will say "but they have saved more lives overall", however the more you look into it the more you realize that vaccines are a Superstition