GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Google at it again! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1011861)

ruff 02-25-2011 07:44 AM

Google at it again!
 
Google Alters Search Algorithm to Avoid Promoting 'Low-Quality' Sites

Anyone notice anything different lately?

redwhiteandblue 02-25-2011 07:51 AM

Yep. Lost 1/3 of traffic on two sites yesterday. :(

alias 02-25-2011 08:06 AM

Real sites and blogs will grow.

wehateporn 02-25-2011 08:13 AM

My Google traffic went down 50% for one day and then returned again...Phew!

seeandsee 02-25-2011 08:25 AM

i hope it helps :)

Robbie 02-25-2011 08:27 AM

Cool. The only people that have to worry are the ones with bullshit sites. Guys that actually work on their sites will prosper. Just like we always have anyway.

Agent 488 02-25-2011 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias (Post 17940076)
Real sites and blogs will grow.

you would think but i got some of my original content sites taken out by the latest algo changes. the google algo isn't perfect.

bronco67 02-25-2011 08:37 AM

It only makes sense. If you don't peddle bullshit, then you shouldn't have to worry.

signupdamnit 02-25-2011 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17940165)
you would think but i got some of my original content sites taken out by the latest algo changes. the google algo isn't perfect.

I think there is more going on in the way of algorithm changes than they are disclosing. I've seen evidence that there have also been some changes to how they are counting certain back links. The changes seem to make sense but the problem is they aren't perfect and some people will get caught in the middle of them without actually doing anything questionable.

Agent 488 02-25-2011 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by signupdamnit (Post 17940180)
I think there is more going on in the way of algorithm changes than they are disclosing. I've seen evidence that there have also been some changes to how they are counting certain back links. The changes seem to make sense but the problem is they aren't perfect and some people will get caught in the middle of them without actually doing anything questionable.

yeah some of my sites were collateral damage as nothing was shady about them. google will never give as response why either and bing/yahoo traffic is a joke. bah ...

rogueteens 02-25-2011 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17940165)
you would think but i got some of my original content sites taken out by the latest algo changes. the google algo isn't perfect.

same here :(

FlexxAeon 02-25-2011 08:55 AM

shit.... one of my money sites had a 25% drop in traffic yesterday

one of the terms it was #1 for i now see it on page 9. hope it will dance back :(

redwhiteandblue 02-25-2011 09:07 AM

One of the sites I can see why it may have been hit, it has some duplicate content issues I'm working on fixing. But the other, it's all original, hand written descriptions, I just added a load more content to it, I've also been quite careful with backlinks. Maybe I've over optimised or something.

Cash 02-25-2011 09:28 AM

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/...-sites-in.html

alias 02-25-2011 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17940165)
you would think but i got some of my original content sites taken out by the latest algo changes. the google algo isn't perfect.

Fuck, this was my concern as well. I mean if we have original text content that is based upon existing images that expands to the detailed desires of today's sophisticated consumer so that he can understand the referred product, is that considered a content farm?

FTW

alias 02-25-2011 10:23 AM

Did any of you have LS link trades on the sites that dropped?

Google has a human element, they log in.

bns666 02-25-2011 10:29 AM

some up some down, seen similar fluctuations in the past so i just don't worry over such things anymore.

Agent 488 02-25-2011 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias (Post 17940451)
Fuck, this was my concern as well. I mean if we have original text content that is based upon existing images that expands to the detailed desires of today's sophisticated consumer so that he can understand the referred product, is that considered a content farm?

FTW

the only thing i found out is google webmaster forum is fucking useless.

basically if you have an affiliate link up you deserve a google ban according to the jokers that post there.

what you described could be called a "thin affiliate site" according to their guidelines.

Agent 488 02-25-2011 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias (Post 17940466)
Did any of you have LS link trades on the sites that dropped?

Google has a human element, they log in.

yes and it crossed my mind, although i love the service.

alias 02-25-2011 10:41 AM

I love it too but nigs be spyin.

redwhiteandblue 02-25-2011 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias (Post 17940533)
I love it too but nigs be spyin.

I think that's nonsense and scaremongering, it's not against Google guidelines to ask another webmaster for a link on his site to yours.

TheDA 02-25-2011 10:51 AM

Mmm. I have a lot of bog standard sites with a lot of RSS feeds and dupe content.

Not seeing a drop in traffic yet, but I'll be keeping my eyes open.

I expected it to happen one day :)

Agent 488 02-25-2011 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteandblue (Post 17940545)
I think that's nonsense and scaremongering, it's not against Google guidelines to ask another webmaster for a link on his site to yours.

yes it is. it's called "engaging in link schemes" and against quality guidelines.

Agent 488 02-25-2011 10:56 AM

google just manually penalized overstock.com for trading discounts for .edu backlinks.

alias 02-25-2011 11:05 AM

Shoot the moon, I think g is skurred that the rise in trading could negate their monopoly. Shit moves fast in the toilet that is web.

redwhiteandblue 02-25-2011 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17940570)
yes it is. it's called "engaging in link schemes" and against quality guidelines.

Asking another webmaster for a link to your site is "engaging in link schemes"?

Frasier 02-25-2011 11:25 AM

I've got 50 or so sites on LS - 20+ of them are heavily traded there. I just ran my SERP rank checking software and the only movement in serps that I've had is UP. Lots of top 10 rankings for low to medium density KW's.

Agent 488 02-25-2011 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteandblue (Post 17940604)
Asking another webmaster for a link to your site is "engaging in link schemes"?

with an attempt to manipulate google, yes.

chaze 02-25-2011 11:48 AM

Yep, they are targeting link farms. Cross linking is a science and multiple class c's is the last thing that will help.

redwhiteandblue 02-25-2011 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17940655)
with an attempt to manipulate google, yes.

Yes but you only have to apply a little thought and common sense to see that if everyone stopped linking to anyone else for fear of being seen to be manipulating the search engines, the whole fucking web would fall apart. So you should just link to, and seek links from, sites that you think fit in with what your surfer is looking for, and LS is as good a tool for that as any other.

fatfoo 02-25-2011 11:54 AM

It's really hard for a robot to decide which site is low quality. Human reviews of sites are the best.

Robbie 02-25-2011 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fatfoo (Post 17940740)
It's really hard for a robot to decide which site is low quality. Human reviews of sites are the best.

Now having fatfoo's bot post that is what we call "Irony" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc