GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How much more affiliates will sign if pay 60-70% ? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1012117)

Peace 02-27-2011 10:24 PM

How much more affiliates will sign if pay 60-70% ?
 
How much more affiliates will sign if pay 60-70% rather then 50%.
Is it even better to pay them 35$ per sign up!

What kind of bonus do you suggest to give to have more affiliates and more traffic?

DBS.US 02-27-2011 10:31 PM

Most affiliates know, The higher the pay the deeper the shave.:2 cents:

DigitalTheory 02-27-2011 10:39 PM

If your site is crap, offering them 60-70 percent wont help any. Not saying your site is, just a general statement. Work smarter not harder :)

Lately I have been leaning towards pay-per-signups when programs allow it because rebills, even for the top sites, seem to be at a stand still.

WiredGuy 02-27-2011 10:43 PM

You could offer 95% and I wouldn't be influenced. PPS or nothing for me. Not sure how many webmasters have the same mentality, but revshare is no longer a payout option I'll consider.
WG

HD Content 02-27-2011 11:22 PM

What will Affiliates consider?

blonda80 02-28-2011 12:05 AM

I like revshare :)

bDok 02-28-2011 12:11 AM

With the right program still rev share is amazing. However, I have learned my lesson and now all links out there are run through a script of mine that at any point I can switch to PPS if I see the avg $ per sale isn't doing above the pps amount.

To tackle your question though... If with 60-70 I can make sales and the ratio is decent for my traffic I'm for sure into it.

DBS.US 02-28-2011 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HD Content (Post 17944606)
What will Affiliates consider?

#1 A site that makes sales.

I don't care about anything but the money, Forget the BS % and fake double payout weekends.


If I send traffic to your site will I make more than if I send traffic to a different site.

FatBastard 02-28-2011 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blonda80 (Post 17944638)
I like revshare :)

I use to too but rebills are down a lot lately

Grapesoda 02-28-2011 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peace (Post 17944556)
How much more affiliates will sign if pay 60-70% rather then 50%.
Is it even better to pay them 35$ per sign up!

What kind of bonus do you suggest to give to have more affiliates and more traffic?

you only really need 1-3 affilates. because it doesn't matter how many you have only how many are selling. :2 cents:

brassmonkey 02-28-2011 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US (Post 17944560)
Most affiliates know, The higher the pay the deeper the shave.:2 cents:

:1orglaugh

StariaMarco 02-28-2011 05:52 AM

When i like the program and content i will sign up also for 30-40%

And when i dont like 60-70% isnt an option

Nicky 02-28-2011 06:06 AM

We offer 70% at EuroRevenue. No shaving going on here I can tell you!

Twoface31 02-28-2011 08:53 AM

well i think all of us will sign up :)

signupdamnit 02-28-2011 08:59 AM

It depends on all the other details related to the program. If everything else is good and you are offering 70% then it's a strong plus. But if your tour is full of leaks and the site has a bunch of cross sales and $3 trials then even 90% wouldn't be enough.

u-Bob 02-28-2011 09:19 AM

see #1, #2 and #3 @ http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...4&postcount=10

great tours, no traffic leaks and sites that CONVERT.

If I have to chose between 50% revshare at 1:200 and 90% revshare at 1:10000, guess which one I'll promote... :)

DirtyDanza 02-28-2011 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 17944571)
You could offer 95% and I wouldn't be influenced. PPS or nothing for me. Not sure how many webmasters have the same mentality, but revshare is no longer a payout option I'll consider.
WG

Why?

im curious to hear your reasons on want to loose money?


and if you want pps only ill pay you 20-30pps to promote our stuff....

just curious why you would want to lose money on sites we all know retain ?

fuzebox 02-28-2011 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyDanza (Post 17945422)
Why?

im curious to hear your reasons on want to loose money?


and if you want pps only ill pay you 20-30pps to promote our stuff....

just curious why you would want to lose money on sites we all know retain ?

I would guess it's because of the volatility of the adult industry, and how many programs, billers, banks, and payment companies have gone down in the last couple of years. It can take years for that "lifetime revshare" to prove it's worth, which doesn't help if a company doesn't exist 3 years from now. $35 today is worth a lot more than a possible $40 in 2 years :2 cents:

Robbie 02-28-2011 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 17944571)
You could offer 95% and I wouldn't be influenced. PPS or nothing for me. Not sure how many webmasters have the same mentality, but revshare is no longer a payout option I'll consider.
WG

That is one opinion.

I prefer revshare every time. And I think that 50% is more than fair. I always tell program owners who try to set up a "special" percentage rate that is higher to please NOT do that.

50% is already unheard of in any other business. And anything higher gives the program owner the temptation to do things shady in order to stay profitable.

Trust me, real webmasters with experience want nothing more or less than a fair partnership that allows both parties to make money together honestly.

Sam - Mr. Skin 02-28-2011 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FatBastard (Post 17944651)
I use to too but rebills are down a lot lately

Not for everyone. Check out our site. When you have a member area like we do and a reasonable price people stay forever.

I'm sure rebills are bad for cookie cutter sites that barely update though. :2 cents:

signupdamnit 02-28-2011 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 17946364)
Trust me, real webmasters with experience want nothing more or less than a fair partnership that allows both parties to make money together honestly.

Yes, exactly.

Robbie 02-28-2011 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sam_mrskincash (Post 17946370)
I'm sure rebills are bad for cookie cutter sites that barely update though. :2 cents:

Yes, this is not a good time for all those Mega generic sites. They were the first to suffer from the effect of piracy for sure.

woj 02-28-2011 06:43 PM

it's a myth that revshare pays more.. when you consider all the details, additional risk you take on, TVM, etc it ends up about the same and in many cases actually less than PPS... :2 cents:

DirtyDanza 02-28-2011 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 17946313)
I would guess it's because of the volatility of the adult industry, and how many programs, billers, banks, and payment companies have gone down in the last couple of years. It can take years for that "lifetime revshare" to prove it's worth, which doesn't help if a company doesn't exist 3 years from now. $35 today is worth a lot more than a possible $40 in 2 years :2 cents:

4 months not 2 years

Kris 02-28-2011 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 17946518)
it's a myth that revshare pays more.. when you consider all the details, additional risk you take on, TVM, etc it ends up about the same and in many cases actually less than PPS... :2 cents:

pretty general statement. like was said earlier, if the site has content to keep the member around and the content is updated, revshare could pay more.

we've got affiliates that earn more than $45 per signup and i've got some that earn way more than that. our sites retain members and we make efforts to keep them around.

wehateporn 03-01-2011 03:16 AM

It's the cookie length I look for, if it's 1 day I feel like it's a scam, but if it's 5 days + that's ok and I do love the 30 day cookie programs

wehateporn 03-01-2011 03:17 AM

If anyone wants to check the length of a cookie, here's the tool I use http://www.rexswain.com/httpview.html

Fabien 03-01-2011 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 17944571)
You could offer 95% and I wouldn't be influenced. PPS or nothing for me. Not sure how many webmasters have the same mentality, but revshare is no longer a payout option I'll consider.
WG

NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'd rather have 20 rebills than a small 35$ PPS
:2 cents:

PR_Glen 03-01-2011 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 17946518)
it's a myth that revshare pays more.. when you consider all the details, additional risk you take on, TVM, etc it ends up about the same and in many cases actually less than PPS... :2 cents:

If revshare wasn't profitable then there would be no programs... none paying pps, none paying revshare... Do you really think we lose money on every pps sale?

we make our money on rebills, if you can't then maybe you should consider how you are selling your product instead.

woj 03-01-2011 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 17947380)
If revshare wasn't profitable then there would be no programs... none paying pps, none paying revshare... Do you really think we lose money on every pps sale?

we make our money on rebills, if you can't then maybe you should consider how you are selling your product instead.

I'm not saying revshare isn't profitable, just saying it's usually not any more profitable than PPS... if sponsor offers both PPS and revshare, it really doesn't make much difference what option affiliate picks... at the end of the day when all is considered they will make about the same with either option... :2 cents:

woj 03-01-2011 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kris (Post 17946792)
pretty general statement. like was said earlier, if the site has content to keep the member around and the content is updated, revshare could pay more.

we've got affiliates that earn more than $45 per signup and i've got some that earn way more than that. our sites retain members and we make efforts to keep them around.

when the site is good and it retains, it's good... it has nothing to do with how affiliate gets paid... if most of your affiliates earn $45/member, then you could just as easily pay around $45 PPS... and that would probably attract many potential affiliates, as many affiliates prefer PPS over revshare...

Oracle Porn 03-01-2011 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 17944571)
You could offer 95% and I wouldn't be influenced. PPS or nothing for me. Not sure how many webmasters have the same mentality, but revshare is no longer a payout option I'll consider.
WG

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh are you for real? only pps? im still averaging $115 from a revshare sponsor, sure there are just a handful worth promoting over revshare, but those handful are really worth it.


p.s. I'm also averaging more then $35/signup revshare from sponsors paying $20-$25 pps

Seth Manson 03-01-2011 09:47 AM

For a porn site I want PPS, for a dating site I want revshare.

fetishwealth 03-01-2011 09:55 AM

We are offering 100% revshare (joins and rebills) for 30 days and try our program
Our cookie has a length of 365 days
We offer $35 PPS by request, only for known sites under 300k alexa

fuzebox 03-01-2011 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 17947587)
when the site is good and it retains, it's good... it has nothing to do with how affiliate gets paid... if most of your affiliates earn $45/member, then you could just as easily pay around $45 PPS... and that would probably attract many potential affiliates, as many affiliates prefer PPS over revshare...

Exactly. If a program is going to say "our affiliates easily earn $xx per member", then set that as a PPS rate and enjoy the extra traffic :2 cents:

AHarper 03-01-2011 12:52 PM

Have a look at the members area. I usually choose revshare but if there are more 3rd party upsells than content, better choose PPS.

In my opinion 50% are ok, it's a fair share for affiliate and program owner.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc