Fox News lies again!!!!!
 

Anyone who watches Fox news should really consider turning it off forever.

US reporters used as human shields to protect Gaddafi :


http://cnn.com/video/?/video/world/2...fox.claims.cnn

Who cares the American public are sheep. They will believe anything they hear on news. The media picks and chooses what people should care about. And everyone falls right in line.

yeah and us clever canadians are all well read, studious and intellectual beings haha

I saw a poll yesterday that claimed only 9% of Americans believe Obama is a US Citizen. Fucking wow.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

no, you're a complete idiot.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

9%??

Come on, that can't be unless the entire poll was taken in Idaho.

More than 9% voted for him.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

CNN sure spends a lot of time watching Fox

I suppose US reporters were not used as human shields.

Foxnews is the name of a fictional tv show. They're missing a wisecracking housekeeper who's constantly out of lemon pledge.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

assclown...

just admit that fox is full of shit quite a bit.... :2 cents:






.

Obama wants to fuck yo momma!

I'd say that brings into question the things you read.

odd then:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...=feeds-newsxml
"""Mission aborted on orders of SAS: RAF attack is halted after troops spot human shields"""
"""Defence sources last night confirmed that the presence of the civilians was the reason the strike was called off.""""




maybe CNN just can't stand having 1/10th the audience of fox:1orglaugh

fair AND balanced...


plus, they report and let you decide!

I think all the news sources play to their crowds, they all lean one way or another. I've seen Fox admit when they get something wrong. Can you admit they do that?

12clicks FTW.

Fox News Channel reported that a planned attack on the capital compound of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi had to be curtailed because of journalists nearby. According to Fox, British sources confirmed that British missiles were ready to fire, but news crews from CNN, Reuters and other organizations were too close to the target.

During a Pentagon briefing on Monday, the coalition commanders confirmed that the compound had been targeted because it housed strategic air defense systems and a Qaddafi military command and control center. The mission was scrapped to avoid civilian casualties, they said.

I dont see any lies here, seems on point to me.

Looks like British Officials are confirming that the story was true....


OUCH FAIL!!!

LOLOLOL!!!!!


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

dailymail.co.uk


BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!



Puuuuuuhhhleeeeeezeeeeeeeee!!!!


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

i can tell u the news we get in USA and news in other countries is very different... watch news in another foreign country and see whats going on

no, they are saying that the reporters were too close. There is a difference there.

Funny how everyone posting here is ignoring posts like this.


How fucking stupid do you have to be to know that the only reason a gov under military attack would have journalists in their strategic targeted building is to either have the other side avoid killing their own people OR to spin propaganda and cry about the damage is done and how poor they are.

Then to have the pentagon admit this is the reason it wasn't attacked just goes to show that ALL the cable channels suck, EVEN fox news because in the end they participated in this even if it was only 1 non journalist they sent.