GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   cropping erotic photos, what are the rules/guidelines? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1018080)

dyna mo 04-12-2011 08:41 AM

cropping erotic photos, what are the rules/guidelines?
 
what's the rule for cropping above or below the knee? cropping out an arm. things like that. what are the rules for where to put such crop lines?

:helpme

Vendzilla 04-12-2011 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 18050526)
what's the rule for cropping above or below the knee? cropping out an arm. things like that. what are the rules for where to put such crop lines?

:helpme

NO rules, we don't need no stinking rules

Depends on what you're using the cropped image for

bronco67 04-12-2011 08:51 AM

Just don't cut out the titties.

fatfoo 04-12-2011 08:52 AM

The crops can be for categories. Crop feet for foot fetish.

L-Pink 04-12-2011 08:54 AM

It's more aesthetically appealing to crop before knees and elbows.


.

dyna mo 04-12-2011 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 18050553)
It's more aesthetically appealing to crop before knees and elbows.


.

before = above? so thighs and upper arms?

TeenCat 04-12-2011 08:58 AM

crop head, tits and pussy, keep the rest ...

dyna mo 04-12-2011 08:59 AM

here's a good example, is this photo composed properly/cropped well?

http://www.alsscan.dvdsuperstar.com/images/011.jpg

Vendzilla 04-12-2011 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 18050566)
here's a good example, is this photo composed properly/cropped well?

http://www.alsscan.dvdsuperstar.com/images/011.jpg

NOt if it's foot fetish site or about her legs

dyna mo 04-12-2011 09:01 AM

another example. is this cropped properly?

http://www.alsscan.dvdsuperstar.com/images/babe.jpg

justinsain 04-12-2011 09:43 AM

The first internet forum I joined was one about photography. It was filled with mostly beginners with a few intermediate guys sprinkled in and rarely would a professional chime in.

I watched as they went back and forth on all the " rules " of photography and cropping was always a hot topic. Many said that you cannot crop just below a joint ( knee, elbow or above like an ankle or wrist ). I remember a heated discussion about cropping at the shin was an absolute mistake. These were all photographers who probably have never been published yet were setting the rules and criticizing others work.

So later that day I went to the mall and as I was walking though I noticed in the window of at least three major chain womens clothing stores pictures hanging that were breaking all the rules those forum photographers were stating. Here were pictures that were part of a national ad campaign breaking all the rules believed by photographers that will never get a picture in a national ad campaign.

" Beginners follow the rules and an artist has no boundaries " I don't know the source of that quote but I always liked it. :)

While there shouldn't be any set rule about cropping that would automatically dismiss it as a reject there are a few things that can be done to make the photo more pleasing.

Where you crop at the joint makes a difference and care should be taken not to them look like an amputee. A classic 3/4 shot would start at the head and crop just above the knee in a pleasing point to accentuate the thigh.

Sometimes you might have to crop something out of the background or foreground that would be distracting to the picture. In doing so your crop line might end up being in an undesirable position on the model. Then you have to decide which is more distracting to the overall photograph, bad crop or bad element.

Another factor in cropping is size constraints. If you are going to keep all your pictures the same size you are limited to some extent as to what you can achieve when cropping.

The example you've posted looks fine even though it's broken the " rule " of cropping just below the knee. There is far too much good stuff going on for that crop to be distracting in any way and it would take someone focused on it to even notice it.

When I make a gallery of model pictures I hand crop each one and every so often I'll crop one just below the knee for those that might admire that part of the leg. It's really hard to please everyone all the time but it doesn't hurt to step outside the box and throw them a bone.

dyna mo 04-12-2011 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justinsain (Post 18050701)
The first internet forum I joined was one about photography. It was filled with mostly beginners with a few intermediate guys sprinkled in and rarely would a professional chime in.

I watched as they went back and forth on all the " rules " of photography and cropping was always a hot topic. Many said that you cannot crop just below a joint ( knee, elbow or above like an ankle or wrist ). I remember a heated discussion about cropping at the shin was an absolute mistake. These were all photographers who probably have never been published yet were setting the rules and criticizing others work.

So later that day I went to the mall and as I was walking though I noticed in the window of at least three major chain womens clothing stores pictures hanging that were breaking all the rules those forum photographers were stating. Here were pictures that were part of a national ad campaign breaking all the rules believed by photographers that will never get a picture in a national ad campaign.

" Beginners follow the rules and an artist has no boundaries " I don't know the source of that quote but I always liked it. :)

While there shouldn't be any set rule about cropping that would automatically dismiss it as a reject there are a few things that can be done to make the photo more pleasing.

Where you crop at the joint makes a difference and care should be taken not to them look like an amputee. A classic 3/4 shot would start at the head and crop just above the knee in a pleasing point to accentuate the thigh.

Sometimes you might have to crop something out of the background or foreground that would be distracting to the picture. In doing so your crop line might end up being in an undesirable position on the model. Then you have to decide which is more distracting to the overall photograph, bad crop or bad element.

Another factor in cropping is size constraints. If you are going to keep all your pictures the same size you are limited to some extent as to what you can achieve when cropping.

The example you've posted looks fine even though it's broken the " rule " of cropping just below the knee. There is far too much good stuff going on for that crop to be distracting in any way and it would take someone focused on it to even notice it.

When I make a gallery of model pictures I hand crop each one and every so often I'll crop one just below the knee for those that might admire that part of the leg. It's really hard to please everyone all the time but it doesn't hurt to step outside the box and throw them a bone.

thank you! this is exactly what i am trying to sort out. i hear of these rules, then i look at some killer photography and it does not follow those rules whatsoever.

i do try to compose my pictures using the rule of thirds though. i find that to help significantly to aesthetically pleasant results.

ottopottomouse 04-12-2011 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 18050566)
here's a good example, is this photo composed properly/cropped well?

Well there's a woman sat in the way and the music system is all out of focus :upsidedow

dyna mo 04-12-2011 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse (Post 18050771)
Well there's a woman sat in the way and the music system is all out of focus :upsidedow

looks like either NAD or Nakamichi.....

justinsain 04-12-2011 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 18050765)
thank you! this is exactly what i am trying to sort out. i hear of these rules, then i look at some killer photography and it does not follow those rules whatsoever.

i do try to compose my pictures using the rule of thirds though. i find that to help significantly to aesthetically pleasant results.

Glad my point came across as I tend to ramble on :)

With photography being a creative art there shouldn't be any rules set in stone however there are plenty of guidelines with the rule of thirds being a fine example.

You can create a photograph to just please yourself or you can create it for an intended audience or create it specifically to a client's requirements. Each one may need a different approach and if you can pull off all three at once it's a great day at work.

Grapesoda 04-12-2011 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 18050765)
thank you! this is exactly what i am trying to sort out. i hear of these rules, then i look at some killer photography and it does not follow those rules whatsoever.

i do try to compose my pictures using the rule of thirds though. i find that to help significantly to aesthetically pleasant results.

general guidelines are no amputations of fingers, hands, toes or feet. crop between knee and thigh, but not usually between ankles and feet, except the 'cowboyheadshot' because of the guns :)

be best to show BOTH hands in a shot... still an amputation if the hand is behind the body etc... now these are photography guidelines, most of the work you see has been gone over by print editors who follow no guidelines what so ever and this is why you see weird stuff in the mags...

there are also different posing for men than women... i.e. masculine and feminine posing... then everything goes out the window shooting for members... :thumbsup

dyna mo 04-12-2011 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 18050822)
general guidelines are no amputations of fingers, hands, toes or feet. crop between knee and thigh, but not usually between ankles and feet, except the 'cowboyheadshot' because of the guns :)

be best to show BOTH hands in a shot... still an amputation if the hand is behind the body etc... now these are photography guidelines, most of the work you see has been gone over by print editors who follow no guidelines what so ever and this is why you see weird stuff in the mags...

there are also different posing for men than women... i.e. masculine and feminine posing... then everything goes out the window shooting for members... :thumbsup

thank you!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc