If you could blink and change one thing about this industry?
 

What would it be? :)

To make it more profitable.

Euthanise Paul Markham.

I'd get rid of those who sincerely care about the industry ...

magazines paying $3000 a set so PM would leave us alone :(

Kill tubes and sites that give away too much free content.

develope a non profit system for collecting funds from customers that is transparent and universal. trim the fat from the middlemen parasites who produce nothing but leech off of the blood sweat and tears of real adult producers and adult merchants

Blinking is just too much like hard work, and actual effort.

That was harsh :helpme

:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

go back to porn in plastic mags and betamax tapes.

bring back 1996

Remove the hobbyists.

Remove all DMCA run websites and file sharing sites.

That's a good answer, though every now and then do push some money into the system

This applies to not just porn but I would take away everyone who fucks it up for everyone else. The guys who get too greedy and basically steal making the whole industry look shady. Dishonorable fuckbags.

Male stars that can't resist the urge to jerk themselves off to finish a scene, when there's a hot girl there to do it for them. No one wants to see a guy whack his bag at the end of a scene. If you want to see that, then you would be a gay.

I would have passed the COPA act and then tgp, tubes, and all this free porn would have never happened.

Bring back to the days when people had to buy porn to see it. Now that's a brilliant idea. Of course there were a few exceptions, but in the norm it was. You want porn, you buy it.

Remove all free porn. The notion that free porn generates porn sales is so wrong it's a surprise it needs to be explained. Doing it the way this industry did it. It's a mystery so many disagree.

Oh I got it, they were affiliates who were able to earn a living off giving away free porn. Can they even figure out how much they would of earned if the extent to the "free porn" was just a banner?

Robbie would be a billionaire instead of boasting he was a millionaire. Or broke.

Getting rid of guys who are clueless about what porn is about would help.

On screen she might look hot, in front of the camera the guy is better off jerking himself off most of the time. She's cold, that's why he's doing himself. :1orglaugh

No I wouldn't. I was here telling every one the business model was wrong in 2000 when magazines sales did make $3,000 a set. The money here was cream on top of the cake. You being a one horse guy wouldn't understand the concept of selling your own content over and over again.

I'd change the fact that 0% of total porn revenue goes to me into say 20% (im not greedy...)

taking it back to 1995

I second this. Although I didn't get into the industry until 1998. I miss the days when link sites and TGPs would yell at your for putting too much content on a site or not having enough advertising.

I would make myself ugly, I just can't stand all the women stalking me :(

Okay now that was seriously funny.

If I could change one thing?

You'd all be working for me.

Be honest who on the board would you have working for you? Even if you could afford it.

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/tshirt.jpg

close down the internet

when people don't reply to an email in 24 hours they get a 5 second shock from a 50,000V TAZER

I think copyright should be 2 years only, not 100 years after your death. There's no incentive for innovation with IP law any more.

So VISTA would be public domain free download by now, IRON MAN and SCREAM 4 would be free legal torrents, LADY GAGA's 2009 hits would all be free download and all the tube videos would be 2 yo.

Want recent media? THEN you pay! And lots would!

You would all be dead.

I don't think that would help much. It woudl still get pirated, but besides that theres still so much old porn out there thats good. Even after so many years in the industry only NOW am i starting to feel like I've seen all the porn.

i will stop donny long's mother to have kidz :2 cents:

how about if you want to see a dick at all you might be gay????

there would little incentive to pirate, show video from 2010 and get a $50,000 fine or show video from 2009 legally.

it's a lot more enforcable than outright copyright infringement.

it's a compromise that most file sharing aficionados would accept.

tubes, not so effective as mainstream I see your point there, 2005 porn is indistinguishable from 2010 porn. amateur content would still be hard to sell but it might open up a market for recognised pornstars if their recent stuff was hard to find on tubes.

I agree, get rid of ALL tubes and free porn. So we can all make money once again.

yeah, blink away all the free porn. lol

That's not right :helpme:1orglaugh

I'd reduce the amount of free porn of course,


and I'd minus the # of complete idiots in our industry by about 90%.





..and the rest of us would be weathier by a factor of 10 by this time nex year.