GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   HIV positive ex pornstar Cameron Reed's girlfriend still performing. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1019390)

alias 04-21-2011 01:14 AM

HIV positive ex pornstar Cameron Reed's girlfriend still performing.
 
Maybe this is old news but here you go anyway. From xbiz:

Just got this email from Shy Love and her people. It never gets boring in the jizz biz does it! Be advised.



Greetings, It has come to the attention of ATM, Inc. that Krystal Tustison, the girlfriend of talent Cameron Reed (aka Derek Burt, aka "Patient Zero") is currently preforming in the the adult industry. She has changed her stage name numerous times within the last couple of weeks. We do not know what the name of the production companies are that she has worked with. We want you to be aware that we were informed that she is still currently in a relationship with the HIV Positive ex male talent. We do not know if she is having protected or unprotected sex. A couple of agencies have called regarding this matter. ATM is sending out a mass flyer. We are advising you to take the precautions necessary to avoid having another "patient zero" situation. If you are hiring her, you are putting yourself and other potential talent at risk. Please be advised. We are not stating that you should not hire this individual, we are giving you the information at hand for you to make your own judgement call on how you want to handle your business. If you have any questions, please call me directly.
Shy Love

EDIT: If you need the # she left email me for it: [email protected]

seeandsee 04-21-2011 01:20 AM

Shit, how does hiv control works in america?!?

digitaldivas 04-21-2011 02:53 AM

...unfortunately, your right, it never gets boring in this business :(

DWB 04-21-2011 03:45 AM

Who in their right mind would hire this girl?

I guess everyone won't be satisfied until OSHA just shuts them down completely.

munki 04-21-2011 04:09 AM

Someone should let the AHF know their new poster boy's girl is still out and about...

JFK 04-21-2011 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18075182)
Who in their right mind would hire this girl?

I guess everyone won't be satisfied until OSHA just shuts them down completely.

someone may, uknowingly !:2 cents:

Grapesoda 04-21-2011 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 18075276)
someone may, uknowingly !:2 cents:

no one reputable will

TheDA 04-21-2011 06:36 AM

Pics??? Is she hot?

RyuLion 04-21-2011 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by munki (Post 18075202)
Someone should let the AHF know their new poster boy's girl is still out and about...

:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

2intense 04-21-2011 06:51 AM

:(:(:(:(:(:(

NaughtyRob 04-21-2011 07:10 AM

I got that email too.

Rochard 04-21-2011 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18075182)
Who in their right mind would hire this girl?

I guess everyone won't be satisfied until OSHA just shuts them down completely.

I think the problem is most people don't know who she is.

Grapesoda 04-21-2011 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18075596)
I think the problem is most people don't know who she is.

we do see their ID's before we shoot

TheDA 04-21-2011 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18075596)
I think the problem is most people don't know who she is.

I guess they might check her ID first :)

iamtam 04-21-2011 08:32 AM

stage names please?

GUNNER 04-21-2011 08:44 AM

I think it's funny all the photogs saying they wouldn't hire her, and oh my gosh how could anyone...

Well, it's pretty simple and goes something kinda like this.

The girl has a current, valid test. Which means she "can" work in adult.
So whomever she hangs around with in her private life has no bearing... right?
In other words, you'd hire her just as you would any other adult model.

If you say no, then that means (by logical argument) that you wouldn't hire any adult actresses because of who should *might* be associating with in her private life.

GUNNER 04-21-2011 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 18075281)
no one reputable will

Oh really??
She just got hired by a big name company recently.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamtam
stage names please?

Kaycee Brooks

JustDaveXxx 04-21-2011 09:47 AM

Her new stage name is "Summer."


People hire her because they dont know. People in this Biz are stupid, but Nobody is that unrepeatable.:2 cents:

czarina 04-21-2011 10:12 AM

that is horrible news. How many people will get infected now because of that little b*tch?

billywatson 04-21-2011 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GUNNER (Post 18075666)
The girl has a current, valid test. Which means she "can" work in adult. So whomever she hangs around with in her private life has no bearing... right? In other words, you'd hire her just as you would any other adult model.

If you say no, then that means (by logical argument) that you wouldn't hire any adult actresses because of who should *might* be associating with in her private life.

This is certainly a valid argument. If Kaycee Brooks/Summer has a valid test, she's just as good to go as any other performer in this industry...unless we start policing and/or evaluating everyone's personal lives, this girl has just as much of a right to work as any other performer.

Imagine if we really could police/evaluate EVERY adult performer's private life...I dunno if there would be any sort of "industry" left.

billywatson 04-21-2011 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by czarina (Post 18075943)
that is horrible news. How many people will get infected now because of that little b*tch?

If her test is clean -- no one.

DWB 04-21-2011 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18075956)
If her test is clean -- no one.

Assuming the test was not a false negative.

There is yet to be a 100% accurate HIV test.

Grapesoda 04-21-2011 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GUNNER (Post 18075700)
Oh really??
She just got hired by a big name company recently.



Kaycee Brooks

I didn't shoot her or nor will I shoot her. though I wish nothing but the best for her....

Grapesoda 04-21-2011 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18075956)
If her test is clean -- no one.

I agree, I just try and avoid problematic models when possible... beside no other models would work with her anyway... because they certainly know now

ez12 04-21-2011 10:44 AM

Damn, thats sick :(

helterskelter808 04-21-2011 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18075956)
If her test is clean -- no one.

There's a window period for HIV which means a test will show 'clean' for an infected person just because it can't (yet) detect any sign of infection.

marcop 04-21-2011 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 18076024)
I agree, I just try and avoid problematic models when possible...

That's what I do too, Brian... in the fall of 2004 I refused to shoot a girl whose ID's I didn't like--three days later she was on America's Most Wanted. She had gone on the lam from a Federal felony charge in NJ, become a stripper in Las Vegas and stolen another girl's ID's there, then moved on to LA to shoot porn. It was a big deal at the time and was on all the porn news websites, but needless to say, some of the scenes she shot made it to DVD's and websites.

JustDaveXxx 04-21-2011 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GUNNER (Post 18075666)
I think it's funny all the photogs saying they wouldn't hire her, and oh my gosh how could anyone...

Well, it's pretty simple and goes something kinda like this.

The girl has a current, valid test. Which means she "can" work in adult.
So whomever she hangs around with in her private life has no bearing... right?
In other words, you'd hire her just as you would any other adult model.

If you say no, then that means (by logical argument) that you wouldn't hire any adult actresses because of who should *might* be associating with in her private life.

I would not hire anyone when I know that the circumstances are as they are here.


I know for a fact that OSHA has dolled out 14K fines to, two producers that i know personally. I have seen the fines myself. These fines were because the shot the little gay kid "Benedict" Burts without a condom. And when they shot him, he too had a clean test.


Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for.

Let me repeat it for you people that skim this post and may have missed it: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!

Let me repeat it for you guys that think that they know it all: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!

One more time for the know it all Canadian "Know it all" Web master: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!

And one more time for the "slow" producer: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!!

And lastly once for the GFY surfer: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!!


Now knowing that you as the producer are on the hook for the 14K fine, will you shoot some cute girl who still bangs her HIV positive boyfriend on the daily? Or move onto the next girl on your approved list?


What if you are booking her for a POV? Same facts as above. Would you bang her?


Keep in mind this is a very real fine. My friend has already dropped 5K on an attorney who will fight this. But thats 5K that he will never get back.


But his test was clean.... OSHA doesn't give a shit and don't want to hear it!!





Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18075951)
This is certainly a valid argument. If Kaycee Brooks/Summer has a valid test, she's just as good to go as any other performer in this industry...unless we start policing and/or evaluating everyone's personal lives, this girl has just as much of a right to work as any other performer.

Imagine if we really could police/evaluate EVERY adult performer's private life...I dunno if there would be any sort of "industry" left.


Nice argument, nice theory. Im here to reduce the chances of getting a 14K fine. Im not trying to be right or win a GFY argument.

The only way to do that is to avoid the "Known Dangers" and hope for the best on the unknown dangers.


For you producers that know me, call me, I will enlighten you on who got what fine and why. If you don't know me, ICQ me and I will ICQ my phone number so we can talk.


And if you already know it all and think im full of shit, I will send "Summer" your contact info and you might even get a good deal. After all, she has a clean test.:2 cents:

Grapesoda 04-21-2011 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 18076053)
There's a window period for HIV which means a test will show 'clean' for an infected person just because it can't (yet) detect any sign of infection.

we've been using genetic test, not antibody test. the test shows it in the body

marketsmart 04-21-2011 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18076009)

There is yet to be a 100% accurate HIV test.

I can tell if a woman has HIV by blowing into her vagina and smelling the air as it comes out of her... :2 cents:






.

helterskelter808 04-21-2011 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 18076094)
we've been using genetic test, not antibody test. the test shows it in the body

Can someone pass on HIV before it's detected in the body? Serious question, I'm just wondering if it can't be detected (by the most advanced test) does that mean it is also not yet developed enough to be passed on?

RTP 04-21-2011 11:17 AM

in addition to Kasey, she goes by Casey also....interestingly ATM released her real name incorrectly it's Crystal with a C (not a K).

she is still shooting with companies in Vegas, California and Miami, even last week I believe

when the shit broke about her bf, she dyed her hair and laid low now she's back it looks like. i interviewed her when she was getting into the business and shot some content and know there is a civilian casualty number also... the two attended swingers parties with other couples in the OC area.

JFK 04-21-2011 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18075956)
If her test is clean -- no one.

How can you be so certain? I certainly would'nt want to touch her with a 10 foot pole. Clean test or not:2 cents:

DWB 04-21-2011 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bm bradley (Post 18076094)
we've been using genetic test, not antibody test. the test shows it in the body

The PCR-DNA test will only detect 2 - 3 weeks out.

While it's way better than nothing, no test is 100%.

The girl should be totally banned from working in the industry, even with a "clean" test. But like it has been said before, a lot of people don't know her. If I met her today, there is a good chance I'd have no idea who she is.

marketsmart 04-21-2011 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 18076181)
How can you be so certain? I certainly would'nt want to touch her with a 10 foot pole. Clean test or not:2 cents:

i dont think you can catch HIV via touching an HIV positive person with a 10 foot pole..

8 foot pole maybe... :2 cents:





.

JFK 04-21-2011 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 18076199)
i dont think you can catch HIV via touching an HIV positive person with a 10 foot pole..

8 foot pole maybe... :2 cents:





.

Dayumn, my doctors degree has'nt arrived in the mail yet, so you could be correct:2 cents:

billywatson 04-21-2011 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18076009)
Assuming the test was not a false negative.

There is yet to be a 100% accurate HIV test.

So do we just quit shooting? Or is this the best we can do?

billywatson 04-21-2011 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 18076053)
There's a window period for HIV which means a test will show 'clean' for an infected person just because it can't (yet) detect any sign of infection.

So does this mean we quit shooting? Or is this the best we can do?

PornoMonster 04-21-2011 11:36 AM

How much do these girls make per B/G Sex Video?

billywatson 04-21-2011 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 18076181)
How can you be so certain? I certainly would'nt want to touch her with a 10 foot pole. Clean test or not:2 cents:

This is my point: we can't.

We can't be certain OF ANYONE...we have a barometer, and it's in effect, and that's the best we can do.

That's that.

This doesn't just apply to the girl in question -- it applies to everyone in this biz. And again, I think if we knew everyone's private biz, there's a shit ton of people we wouldn't shoot.

billywatson 04-21-2011 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoMonster (Post 18076251)
How much do these girls make per B/G Sex Video?

:1orglaugh

I love it when surfers troll this board.

JustDaveXxx 04-21-2011 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18076255)
This is my point: we can't.

We can't be certain OF ANYONE...we have a barometer, and it's in effect, and that's the best we can do.

That's that.

This doesn't just apply to the girl in question -- it applies to everyone in this biz. And again, I think if we knew everyone's private biz, there's a shit ton of people we wouldn't shoot.

Agreed:thumbsup

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18076260)
:1orglaugh

I love it when surfers troll this board.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


My exact thoughts.:thumbsup

billywatson 04-21-2011 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18076190)
The girl should be totally banned from working in the industry, even with a "clean" test.

I disagree.

I'm not advocating hiring her, but if the criterion we put into place is met by the performers, how can they be "banned"?

JustDaveXxx 04-21-2011 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18076271)
I disagree.

I'm not advocating hiring her, but if the criterion we put into place is met by the performers, how can they be "banned"?

Would you hire here if she was on your approved list?

PornoMonster 04-21-2011 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18076260)
:1orglaugh

I love it when surfers troll this board.

There is a little more to the adult biz, then just hardcore production.
Sorry I asked a Question on a webmaster board.

Back in the day a model would get 2-3K, to do cumfiesta, I heard now it was around $900.

Anon = Yes
Surfer = No

Smile!

marcop 04-21-2011 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoMonster (Post 18076251)
How much do these girls make per B/G Sex Video?

Ooh... a civilian. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

billywatson 04-21-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustDaveXxx (Post 18076281)
Would you hire here if she was on your approved list?

Honestly -- nope. I wouldn't. And it makes me feel like a hypocrite.

JustDaveXxx 04-21-2011 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billywatson (Post 18076305)
Honestly -- nope. I wouldn't. And it makes me feel like a hypocrite.

Thats all I wanted to know. Much respect for the truth. You are also a stand up guy and class act, who will always tell the truth.:thumbsup


I knew the answer before you posted it.:thumbsup




And lastly, and more imprtantly as a result of you not hiring this girl, you wont be getting fined 14K by OSHA if she becomes the next patient Zero.:thumbsup:thumbsup

Juicy D. Links 04-21-2011 11:59 AM

Good thing my penis is too small to be a actor

billywatson 04-21-2011 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoMonster (Post 18076284)
There is a little more to the adult biz, then just hardcore production.

No there isn't. :winkwink:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123