vaccine for AIDS [video]
 

http://www.resolvefromcdf.org/videos.aspx




.

http://www.resolvefromcdf.org/vaccine-facts.aspx

Lots of buzzwords in there that make me think: run.
I truely hope that I'm wrong.

Given that HIV was originally spread around Africa via vaccine, it's difficult to trust them anymore. Vaccines are being used for sinister purposes, like the H1N1 vaccine. We would be a lot better off without them

http://www.originofaids.com/images/M...994%20copy.jpg

Jesus money dont care about lifes...

Best to stick to this thread instead of posting everywhere: Autism caused by Vaccines? Researcher indicted for FRAUD

Good thinking Eric, there's a lot of info in that thread :thumbsup

Which doesn't mean it's good or bad.

Exactly, people have to research for themselves and not blindly follow the "Group Think", if they eventually agree with the "Group Think" then that's OK. Afterall, a "Group Think" has previously been "Let's kill all the Jews", so it's important to beware of propaganda

I think I would trust the stem cell thing in Germany first.

Interesting. Link or more info?

no thank you, i will let the doctors and scientists do the research for me as they are the ones who are FUCKING QUALIFIED TO DO SO....

you going to take out your own appendix?

vaccines save more lives than anything else ever has... stop being a conspiracy sheep...

Exactly, the other week the cure for Cancer was announced, but not in the newspapers, big Pharma is ignoring it.

http://hubpages.com/hub/Scientists_c...e_takes_notice

It would be like the adult industry selling a solution to free porn. "We need one $50 payment then the rest of the porn is free forever". The AIDS and Cancer industries are the same, it's about finding ways to get recurring income. This means drugs that require continued use and vaccines/drugs which cause other illnesses/diseased which then bring in cross-sales

I understand that it can seem scary to those who don't come from a science background, but if you've got a good understanding of business, then you can certainly learn about that side and decide whether you trust the companies involved or whether they are being run by criminals.

Most doctors don't take vaccines themselves, in the same way as IT Techs don't install Norton Antivirus on their own PCs

There are many many many many types of cancer. They all work in different ways. Almost all types of cancer are treatable today. Quantum leaps in treatments for most types of cancer and the effectiveness of drugs/treatments are made every year. There is no magic bullet which miraculously treats every form of cancer.

But hey, if its on hubpages, it must be fact.

To fucking say that all researchers all over the planet that are working hard and making tremendous strides in treating/curing cancer are sitting on "cures" is fucking pathetic and more inhuman than the idea itself.

Not to mention the fact that the "article" in question says the new "miracle" therapy came from a university.. not a pharmaceutical company. I guess all these grad students, the private foundations funding the research et al.. are gonna keep their mouths shut, not publish papers and not leak any cure to the public and not help people either for the benefit of drug companies.

It's just business; money makes the world go around :2 cents:

Yeah... all universities do nothing good with their medical and science programs. The world never benefits from anything done in a university lab.

Money corrupts, that's what my point is. There are good people out there, but the system has been corrupted. Unfortunately the WHO, the FDA and the CDC are all part of that system (not just the companies themselves)

You still get some honest people like The Council of Europe http://www.newstatesman.com/healthca...council-europe and the independent and internationally renowned Cochrane Collaboration http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/he...-evidence.html

Lets explore the goofy logic being used here which is really nothing more than you saying "i don't trust authority".

Government approval is requested and granted to pursue clinical trials for this drug in cancer treatment.

Government approval is granted.

Clinical trials begin (over 1/2 a decade ago) to explore the role of an inexpensive drug which is ALREADY actively used in the treatment of quite a few diseases, to explore its possible role in treating cancer.

Some of the clinical trials indicate a there was a great deal of success. Some indicate there are still some concerns that need to be looked at further.

More trials continue.

... You have then somehow took it here:

1) Its a miracle drug that "cured" cancer and no one in the educational or medical community or media cared or noticed.

2) Because of the fact that it can't be patented, means there is no commercial interest or interest in the medical community in using it.. so millions of people will just suffer and die of cancer for no reason at all.

Both of the above points ignore the fact that it is a drug ALREADY commonly used to treat disease which negates these points.

:upsidedow