Hey dumb fucks, the jury found her not guilty so shut the fuck up
 

emotional idiots. if there was evidence that she did it, it would have been guilty verdict.

are you all fucking retarded?

Im lost ...

...no you!

Your avatar is too distracting.

i know i lick my screens today.

I have no idea wtf are you talking about so here's a pic of a guy inside a banana

http://www.thosefunnypictures.com/re...tures_7424.jpg

btw, I find the term "dumb fuck" deeply offensive, we prefer "sexually challenged persons with different social skills"

harvey you are cool. i like you.

Sorry:thumbsup

It is amazing how many people have evidence of her guilt but neglected to provide it to the prosecution. GFY is a bunch of accomplices or enablers.

yes. some real inspector gadgets on here.

OJ was found innocent too

Yep. Hitler didn't do it either. The jews killed themselves so Israel would be born. :upsidedow

exactly .. everyone knows jurors always make the right decision..

that avatar makes me think like a lesbian...

I lost focus as well haha.

Is it true OJ has agreed to confess on Oprah!

I read it on here soemwhere , so it must be true:winkwink:

I never said anything :pimp

this is akin to saying our judicial system and the humans behind it are perfect in every sense of the word because if B happened, it definitely came because of A. You sir are a moron.

so drinking and smoking means she is guilty?

No, we don't share that condition with you

Who the hell still thinks that the law it's somewhere near just?? ...

It was a grand plan for the Bankers to get their own country, using the Jews as an excuse. Once you have your own country, you can have a military, resources and far greater global political power.

she is guilty but the fact of the matter is the foresnics team messed up big time. They had the heart imprint on the duct tape which was used on the child...failed to take pics, found the same heart stickers in casey anthonys home along with the same duct tape and plastic bags. The evidence is there, it just was not documented to the point of where it is "beyond a reasonable doubt"

Who what where?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

The magically disappearing heart shaped sticker residue is just one example of the types of "evidence" (innuendo) that make people freak out and stand by a courthouse holding signs. It's tv fodder but it's not evidence because it doesn't exist.

Wow, there's some man standing outside the courthouse with duct tape over his mouth and a heart shaped sticker on it.

Mythbusters needs to take a pig head, stick duct tape on it, stick a sticker on it, and set it in a swamp for 6 months. When there's only a skull left, test it for DNA and sticker residue. I'm guessing you'll find tons of DNA and the sticker will still be in place and faded. I'm actually surprised this hasn't been done in the past years leading up to the case.

turn off nancy grace and burn your tabloids.

Through the current court system she was found innocent of the most serious charges.

Because of the workings of the court system the jury doesn't get to see ALL of the evidence due to effective legal wrangling. Because of this those outside of the jury have much more to work with in forming their own personal opinion. Granted that doesn't make her guilty or innocent in the eyes of the court but it goes a long way in determining her true innocence or guilt.

An extreme example would be something like this.

A security camera on the next door neighbors house actual captures Casey drowning the child in the pool, wrapping duct tape around her head and then placing her in the garbage bags and then placing her in the trunk of the car. This evidence would prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defense successfully has the security tape evidence excluded because of a technicality where the neighbor unlawfully filmed the Anthony's property or whatever ( you get the idea ).

The public gets to see the video tape and knows she is in fact guilty. The jury however doesn't and she is acquitted due to lack of evidence. This scenario give the public a better chance to render TRUE guilt or innocence even though it isn't done though our legal system.

All it takes is 1 person out of 12 saying she is not guilty.

Doesn't mean she didn't do it.

People are entitled to their opinions, good or bad, wrong or right.

Never heard that - is there a link? I have a problem with evidence such as this not being submitted since it proves without doubt - so have a hard time acknowledging that the judge etc. would simply throw it out as they have used security camera's from many locations to find and catch criminals. American's Most Wanted always shows it and I'm sure the criminals who got caught on tape can't say - "well the store didn't have my permission to film me when I shot the bastard outside in the parking lot".

so you were there? you saw her kill the kid?
why didn't you testify?
exactly. shut the fuck up. you don't know, and that is called 'reasonable doubt'.
you cannot convict people if the evidence is not compelling enough to convict.

The state has the MASSIVE advantage on evidence, they even get the last word with rebuttal and rebuttal closing arguments. They even leaked that there "was" a heart sticker RIGHT over the mouth on the duct tape. BUT they didnt leak that Cindy Anthony had said she thought she did the searches on the computer. Thats another HUGE advantage they had and used and still failed to prove their case. We KNOW from the trial there was no heart shaped sticker found. (and the residue disappeared?) Yet people still think for some reason that there was one! Why? People WANT to believe what they want to believe and so they do believe it.

People believe there was duct tape over her face. Why? Because duct tape was found near the skull? Was it even AROUND the skull? So should we believe Roy Kronk lifted the skull up and then set it back down and the tape never moved? And leading to that, should we think someone went to all the trouble to wrap the body in 3 bags and oh the heck with the head leave it out of the bags? I submit to you that the duct tape was sealing the bag, and Kronk removed it, and the head fell out when he lifted the bag, and the head landing on the duct tape. Whats more likely. But I admit I missed the part of the trial where they asked him if the tape was on the skull or not. And clearly I havent seen pictures. A lot of it still doesn't make sense. The prosecution says the water was deep and flowing enough to leave only silt in the skull, but that the hair was over the tape proves the tape was on before she decomposed? Water doesn't move hair? Just a mess.

Also for what it's worth, the word is that the initial jury vote when they began deliberations was 10 to 2. Only 2 people thought she was guilty initially and then came around to not guilty.

Of course!

best part is the people who say that she or the jurors should 'burn in hell' or other violent suggestions of what should befall the people involved

reap what one sows

its amazing, after the fact, how militant people are about reasonable doubt. That loophole exists to protect the "innocent." Nothing about Caseys behavior was "innocent." Celebrating her daughters disappearance, avoiding her parents & cops, not testifying...she's as guilty as OJ. The jury chose to ignore 30 days of evidence pointing to 1 person just because nobody saw the crime.

Shit, the fucking defense was manslaughter...the kid drowned in the pool...but the jury couldnt even convict on that? That jury was a fucking joke.

thats a hung jury not an acquittal.

Good post Tom!


+1



.

how would they convict her of manslaughter when she wasn't tried for manslaughter?
some of you are some real rocket scientists on how law works.

yes. good post. people are making comments with their emotions. they want a resolve to make themselves feel better.

You could always not read those threads..

yes..

yes..

i was scared...






.

count #2 was aggrevated manslaughter. Quit talking like you have a clue. your embarassing yourself.

exactly moron. aggravated manslaughter, not manslaughter. i have many clues. the first is you are making emotional statements. thank god none of you idiots are jurors.

yes everyones a lawyer