![]() |
Casey Anthony doesn't need to do porn for $1 million, just an interview.
http://specials.msn.com/A-List/Lifes...entid=29621184
It's just totally fucking retarded how this woman can kill her child and then get paid $1 million dollars just for a tv interview, just a shame what the media will do for a story, I wouldn't give that bitch one penny. |
Shame on that mother.
|
hmmm, I heard she was found not guilty.
|
people have more or less already forgot about her.
if karla holmolka can start a new life anyone can. |
Quote:
She wouldn't get $5 if no one watched it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
she should make a movie for tarantino
|
Quote:
The talk shows should pay a million dollars to anyone that can find a similar quote made by you about OJ. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
WTF! :Oh crap |
Quote:
If soup came to nuts, I would bet the farm that Baddog wouldn't go 3 hours without his dog on the back of his bike... or the canine. |
Quote:
|
kind of fucked up, but what are you going to do ? Best is not to watch:2 cents:
|
i wonder what woman will kill her kid next so she can get a million dollar interview.
|
Quote:
Actually, what's "totally fucking retarded" is how everyone thinks she murdered her child. Were you there when Caylee took her last breath? Obviously not and if my memory serves me right, she was found NOT GUILTY. Dumbass. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
AND do you know, if my child was murdered and I was accused of it and I got locked up, then let out. The first fucking thing I'd be doing would be putting my face on every fucking television out there to rally everyone to try to catch who did it, she sure the fuck doesn't seem worried that her child's killer is out there because there isn't one out there. I think most of you are thinking with your dicks to defend her. Sorry guys, she's not gonna fuck any of you because you're sticking up for her on here. |
The circumstantial physical evidence included duct tape that was the same brand as used in the Anthony home. There was DNA on it. While the DNA could not positively ID anyone, it did show that it did not belong to Caylee or Casey.
How about Pops? |
believe it or not, reasonable doubt can let killers free. OJ simpson.
not clear how anyone conclude innocence based on her behavior after the fact. What shes truly guilty of, only 1 person knows. But her daughter disappeared, she partied. :Oh crap |
I like living in a country where I am innocent until proven guilty.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The difference, there was no evidence that Casey did it. :2 cents: |
$1 Million wont go very far....soon everyone will lose interest in her, and she will go right back to the crappy life she had
|
http://www.wftv.com/2008/0910/17441579.jpg
She was found not guilty because the jury felt the evidence presented wasn't enough to convict her of murder. Of the jurors that have given statements most felt she had involvement in her child's death but just were not clear on what the level of that involvement was. At worst she's a child murder, at best she's a theif, a neglectful mother and a pathalogical liar that partied with her friends while treating her child's corpse like yesterday's garbage (literally). It bothers me the way some people are putting her up on a pedistal like she's a saint. She's a fucking scumbag any way you slice it. :disgust |
if you buy a product that advertises on whatever show gets her then you're giving her money.
|
Im no Casey Anthony fan, but I don't think she killed her child with malicious intent.
If she is guilty, its being a young incompetent mother. Caring for a child for over 2 years then developing the mind set to kill that child, isn't believable to me. I believe the child died accidentally and the young mother got scared when confronted. I think the court system came back with the right verdict. At the end of the day knowing that your child died when in your care because you are an irresponsible mother is a pretty bad life sentence to live with. |
You know what would have been fun to watch, Casey Anthony defend herself if the law was reversed and you are guilty unless proven innocent and the burden to do so is placed on the defendant.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There were lesser charges they could have brought against her but the state chose to go all or nothing on murder. Hindsights 20/20. I thought the prosecution made a strong case but because I can't erase the details known that weren't presented in the trial from my memory I can't view the evidence as it was presented objectively. That said, even in my own limited experience dealing with the DA's office I saw them drop the ball and break some pretty basic unspoken rules. It fucking blows but it is what it is. Most likely she will never live the "Bella Vita", even now her 15 minutes of infamy are fading, people are moving on. I'm just crossing my fingers Baez holds out too long and the deals drop back down to the 5 figure range. |
Quote:
I guess my point was if she had to prove her innocence she would have had a much harder time coming up with evidence to support her claim than the prosecutors had to prover her guilty if that makes any sense. She couldn't just create several scenarios of what might of happened to create doubt in the jury's eyes she would have had to come up with actual, factual evidence to prover her case and it would be very interesting to see how she would do that. |
i maybe wrong but i question if she will see much money from publicity. I gotta believe she has extremely bad Q score.
|
What's funny about the Casey Anthony thing is that I'm mostly finding that people with children stick with the "she was found not guilty" while those without children tend to think she killed her daughter.
Make of that what you will. |
fuck her. i hope she rots in hell
|
Still can't believe she got away with it :disgust
|
Quote:
Since you're too fucking stupid to understand even the most basic concepts in the English language - let me help. But before we get started, please clean yourself up... have someone wipe the dribble of drool off your face, you're embarrassing yourself... then have that person check your Depends adult diapers... now pour yourself a glass of prune juice and try to wrap your feeble mind around this simple concept,... Being found "not guilty" by a court, does not mean "she didn't do it" :2 cents: |
Killing that kid was the best thing she ever did for herself.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's the great thing about civil trials, both sides can burden shift all day long. Unfortunatly here the surviving immediate family seems happy with the verdict. Cindy lied on the stand to save her daughter and Casey certainly isn't going to sue herself. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Did they ever figure out who killed Jon Benet? lol
All opinion aside, they definitely missed uncovering a big chunk of what happened with this case... maybe the truth will come out one day. And people who harm and kill little children should be barbequed alive and left for the vultures. |
Lot of unanswered questions in that case, not excluding why the grandparents did some of the things they did or didnt do as well as Casey. Was the ladder up or wasn't it? Was the gas can there or wasn't it? Was the tape on there or wasn't it? Did George smell something or didn't he? Did he call the cops and why not? Did mom do the searches or didnt she? Was she at work when she was clocked in or wasn't she?
Lee Anthony said his mom Cindy specifically said "I sent them down there to search" and she said she never ever told them to go search. Was it a lie or wasnt it? Do we really believe half of what mom said and a quarter of what dad said? How confident in a single word of their testimony are you? I'm at about zero. The whole family was responsible and honestly I thought it was pretty obvious that they all knew more than they were saying, with the exception of Lee who seemed like he was the only one outside the loop of lies and was just pissed off about it. I dont think they ever found who killed Jon Bennet but they did exclude the parents years afterwards as I recall. Even after the mom died. She lived out her life with people thinking she killed her own daughter. |
Come on Baddog. I know your partial to the judicial system. For that you should also know that it can be flawed.
Say she didnt kill her kid. She still deserves punishment for how she handled herself. Do I think she did it? yes. Do I care that she was not convicted, no! Put court aside. Duct tape. chloroform. trunk rot. month wait. body found at relatives. Do you think she did it? |
Quote:
:thumbsup |
It's kind of fucked up when killing / neglecting the disappearance of your kid turns out to be the best career choice.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you have some evidence that I missed, please feel free to present it. Just because Nancy Grace says she did it is not good enough for me. :2 cents: |
Nancy Grace is NOT a fan of her's and she doesn't hold back when it comes to Tot Mom
|
Quote:
It's an important part of the trial as the jury was led to believe the same thing. I'd like to point out that absolutely no evidence to support the sexual abuse was presented at trial. No friend that Casey had confided in about the abuse came forward to testify. No police records of the abuse. No therapists treated her for sexual abuse. Casey didn't take the stand and testify to the abuse. There was absolutely no evidence to substantiate the sexual abuse allegations. The sexual abuse allegations were made in graphic detail by her lawyer in his opening statement. He is the only one to make the claim and conveniently he enjoys impunity to anything he says in the courtroom. Baez got up there and shocked everyone with his graphic allegations which were clearly meant to scar the image into the mind of the jury. From that point on the prosecutors had to work to get them back to reality but it was a huge up hill battle and in most respects the damage had been done by Baez's unsubstantiated sexual abuse allegations. With that in his pocket he knew with the alleged affair witness he would be able to discredit the father and create reasonable doubt even though his claims were unsubstantiated. As far as the grief goes, the defense brought up a witness that was an expert in grief and got her to testify that everyone grieves in different ways. What the expert DIDN'T do was actually examine Casey to see how she grieves. The expert even said she was unfamiliar with Casey Anthony and didn't know about her until she was called a few days before her testimony date to testify for the defense. I wonder what her opinion would have been if she were actually allowed to examine Casey before her testimony. The sexual abuse allegation was a shrewd move by the defense that swayed many minds in favor of Casey. Not mine as there was absolutely no evidence presented to corroborate that statement and therefore I choose to exclude it when forming my opinion as to her guilt. If you find the sexual allegations bogus and take it out of the trial I think it would take away most of the defense and we might have got a much different verdict. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123