Should all sponsers a ccbill option?
 

Ma\ny offer nats, but would you prefer to sign up to them if they offered ccbill?

this way you could choose to use there nats system or there ccbill.

as has been said people with they would lower there payouts from $100 to much lower (in nats). if you signed up via ccbill you do not have this problem.

so why not offer ccbill speperatly?

SpookyCash offers both CCBill and Epoch tours, as some affiliates prefer CCBill and some Epoch, so I imagine it would be similarly easy for sponsors to offer a CCBill option and a NATS option.

At a certain point, it becomes maybe too many eggs in the CCBill basket, but there are certainly sponsors I would try throwing a few links up for to test, if I thought it was likely I'd get my dough.

We offer Segpay CCBill, Epoch, Netcash AND we let affiliates select who they want their traffic processed through.

We also let affiliates switch their selection whenever they want. Most every program cascades their processors - but not every program lets you choose who is going to process your traffic. Check us out, you wont be disappointed with you ratios!

I have seen a few sites I wanted to sign up with that I didn't do it because they did not offer ccbill. My preference for ccbill my be because I am a small time webmaster and there may be some sponsors who would rather work with bigger networks than mine and could care less if me or other small timers have overlooked there programs.

I guess I see oth sides.

yes

i think the same