![]() |
SEO Linking: PR -VS- Relevance - POLL
SEO Linking
It is being argued that PR is more important that Relevance. If you have a site all about "Cars" and you have only 2 choices for backlinks which would you choose to have: - A Link from a PR-1 homepage that has relevance and is all about "cars" - A Link from a totally non-relevant PR-7 homepage about "women's dresses" |
the PR7 link.
|
Relevance FTW
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Win |
Good question. I think quality and authority are more important. The PR1 site could be some brand new thrown up page which isn't going to do anything for you. If the PR7 site is authoritative, been around for ages, quality...it would probably be a better choice.
|
I think it depends. I wouldn't ask a link to fastmusclecars.com from funwithknitting.com even if it had a high PR
|
Quote:
|
Relevance wins with Google these days. The verdict has been in about that question for quite a while now. So called SEO experts who say otherwise are just after your money.
While it's true you can impart authority from high PR links, if it's not relevant then it will cancel itself out. |
Relevance is gonna carry a lot of weight but there's a lot of other factors to consider. If you're targeting say the MILF niche. A link from a site like pornhub is gonna carry more weight than some shitty niche MILF blog that doesn't rank for shit.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This was interesting read. Each day something knew to learn.
:thumbsup J:)lly |
porn is porn. but car link to porn not so great. I prefer alexa rank over relevance and pr
|
Quote:
As I'm sure Baddog knows It's also used by 1% bikers meaning Fuck The World |
Quote:
Anyways, some of my thoughts. If you have relevant sites out there, then hit my sig. |
In your example, PR matters much more. Trust is a massive factor in Google's algorithms. What's to say the relevant link is not from your friends shitty blog? But your example was extreme. A non relevant PR7 versus a relevant PR5 is a different story.
Oh and I agree PR is rather dead (in its original format), but just using it as a measurement of Google's rating/trust of a site. |
PR is a waste. Relevance would most likely lead to natural traffic. Go with relevance. Even google says PR is dumb.
|
Quote:
|
Lol at those 8 idiots who voted for high pr backlink.With high pr you can only gain high PR but not good serps.Love when some webmasters says "i have so much backlinks yet no any serps,wtf google ".For example,i have only few backlinks yet i rank in top 10 for one mayor keyword,reason for that is because i target only relevant backlinks no matter what pr they have.Also that same site have only pr1 yet it receives 9k daily se traffic.
|
relevance is a seo myth. take the pr 7.
|
when you get a pr 7 link you notice the difference. trust me. if you don't get that well not much to say really. go grab your pr 1 "relevant" links then.
|
Quote:
But that doesn't change fact how is much better to concentrate your seo campaign on relevant backlinks instead blindy getting backlinks from anywhere. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A PR7 page is a trusted page. A PR1 page is nothing. A link from a PR7 page means a great deal more than a link from a PR1 page. Of course there are many other factors with ranking, but when it comes down to it... "relevance" in this example is irrelevant since you fuckwits can't even define what relevance is and have no clue. Relevant to what? What constitutes relevance? Relevance matters and is obviously a factor, but not enough for a PR1 domain to trump a PR7. |
Quote:
|
A Link from a Relevant PR-1 Page
|
Totally dependent on the PR7 site... What is it? .gov? .edu? Huffington Post?
|
How does Google define Relevancy? By looking at the anchor text? And some might think it's strictly about the content of the site. It would be ideal if all the links to your site are built in those sites with relevant content. But is that how Google tell what is relevant and what not???
Links using relevant anchor text could be considered relevant too. From, http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/anchor-text Quote:
Quote:
And perhaps you can spread your links on sites ranging from PR1 to 9, relevant to irrelevant, using the same anchor text that you want to rank well on, which would/could make sense to Google because real world people talk about anything, anywhere and anytime they want. |
I think a better question would be a pr1 relevent vs a non relevant pr2-3-4
Any pr5,6,7 I would jump at the chance to get a link. both have their arguments for and against but the chance to get pr5,6,7 is too great. If anyone who voted for relevance and have pr7 links I will happily build relevent blogs and get them to PR1 and link to you for your link back from a PR7 |
Lets put it another way when promoting milfs.
pornhub.com is pr5, not even a pr7 and you retards are telling me you would prefer a relevent link from an unknown pr1 milfbloger8235.com rather than pornhub.com? noone is denying relevence is important but dont underestimate a pr7 i should really set up a blacklist for retarded webmasters p.s. sorry to go off topic with porn and not cars |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc