GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ron Paul - The Movie ! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1034593)

stinkyfingers 08-17-2011 02:33 PM

Ron Paul - The Movie !
 

mafia_man 08-17-2011 03:38 PM

I'm not even a Republican but he's better than Obama.

topsiteking 08-17-2011 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mafia_man (Post 18362680)
I'm not even a Republican but he's better than Obama.

No shit.
:disgust

chaze 08-17-2011 04:07 PM

He is the best politician period. Smart and honest, crazy to see it in this day.

sambucas 08-17-2011 11:24 PM

Dear Americans, please elect Ron Paul so we can live in peace.

seeandsee 08-18-2011 12:34 AM

Ron Paul for president, if he did it, i think somebody will try to take him down, if he start to clean america

buzzard 08-18-2011 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sambucas (Post 18363322)
Dear Americans, please elect Ron Paul so we can live in peace.

Most simple and profound comment ever.

Absolutely great sambucas...


Props and cheers to you!

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

looky_lou 08-18-2011 01:34 AM

Will be nominated in the Short Story category unfortunately. :(

DWB 08-18-2011 03:05 AM

The bankers would kill him faster than they did Kennedy.

With that said, and not that it even matters, but I will vote for Ron Paul.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 08-18-2011 03:38 AM

http://s3.thisnext.com/media/largest...n/BB2EF3DF.jpg

ADG

sperbonzo 08-18-2011 07:38 AM

Ron Paul's plan for health care reform in 2006

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul339.html

Lowering the Cost of Health Care

by Ron Paul
by Ron Paul


DIGG THIS

As a medical doctor, I've seen first-hand how bureaucratic red tape interferes with the doctor-patient relationship and drives costs higher. The current system of third-party payers takes decision-making away from doctors, leaving patients feeling rushed and worsening the quality of care. Yet health insurance premiums and drug costs keep rising. Clearly a new approach is needed. Congress needs to craft innovative legislation that makes health care more affordable without raising taxes or increasing the deficit. It also needs to repeal bad laws that keep health care costs higher than necessary.

We should remember that HMOs did not arise because of free-market demand, but rather because of government mandates. The HMO Act of 1973 requires all but the smallest employers to offer their employees HMO coverage, and the tax code allows businesses ? but not individuals ? to deduct the cost of health insurance premiums. The result is the illogical coupling of employment and health insurance, which often leaves the unemployed without needed catastrophic coverage.

While many in Congress are happy to criticize HMOs today, the public never hears how the present system was imposed upon the American people by federal law. As usual, government intervention in the private market failed to deliver the promised benefits and caused unintended consequences, but Congress never blames itself for the problems created by bad laws. Instead, we are told more government ? in the form of ?universal coverage? ? is the answer. But government already is involved in roughly two-thirds of all health care spending, through Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs.

For decades, the U.S. healthcare system was the envy of the entire world. Not coincidentally, there was far less government involvement in medicine during this time. America had the finest doctors and hospitals, patients enjoyed high-quality, affordable medical care, and thousands of private charities provided health services for the poor. Doctors focused on treating patients, without the red tape and threat of lawsuits that plague the profession today. Most Americans paid cash for basic services, and had insurance only for major illnesses and accidents. This meant both doctors and patients had an incentive to keep costs down, as the patient was directly responsible for payment, rather than an HMO or government program.

The lesson is clear: when government and other third parties get involved, health care costs spiral. The answer is not a system of outright socialized medicine, but rather a system that encourages everyone ? doctors, hospitals, patients, and drug companies ? to keep costs down. As long as ?somebody else? is paying the bill, the bill will be too high.

The following are bills Congress should pass to reduce health care costs and leave more money in the pockets of families:

HR 3075 provides truly comprehensive health care reform by allowing families to claim a tax credit for the rising cost of health insurance premiums. With many families now spending close to $1000 or even more for their monthly premiums, they need real tax relief ? including a dollar-for-dollar credit for every cent they spend on health care premiums ? to make medical care more affordable.

HR 3076 is specifically designed to address the medical malpractice crisis that threatens to drive thousands of American doctors ? especially obstetricians ? out of business. The bill provides a dollar-for-dollar tax credit that permits consumers to purchase "negative outcomes" insurance prior to undergoing surgery or other serious medical treatments. Negative outcomes insurance is a novel approach that guarantees those harmed receive fair compensation, while reducing the burden of costly malpractice litigation on the health care system. Patients receive this insurance payout without having to endure lengthy lawsuits, and without having to give away a large portion of their award to a trial lawyer. This also drastically reduces the costs imposed on physicians and hospitals by malpractice litigation. Under HR 3076, individuals can purchase negative outcomes insurance at essentially no cost.

HR 3077 makes it more affordable for parents to provide health care for their children. It creates a $500 per child tax credit for medical expenses and prescription drugs that are not reimbursed by insurance. It also creates a $3,000 tax credit for dependent children with terminal illnesses, cancer, or disabilities. Parents who are struggling to pay for their children's medical care, especially when those children have serious health problems or special needs, need every extra dollar.

HR 3078 is commonsense, compassionate legislation for those suffering from cancer or other terminal illnesses. The sad reality is that many patients battling serious illnesses will never collect Social Security benefits ? yet they continue to pay into the Social Security system. When facing a medical crisis, those patients need every extra dollar to pay for medical care, travel, and family matters. HR 3078 waives the employee portion of Social Security payroll taxes (or self-employment taxes) for individuals with documented serious illnesses or cancer. It also suspends Social Security taxes for primary caregivers with a sick spouse or child. There is no justification or excuse for collecting Social Security taxes from sick individuals who literally are fighting for their lives.

August 23, 2006



.:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

stinkyfingers 08-18-2011 01:51 PM


Ethersync 08-18-2011 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stinkyfingers (Post 18364761)

Another reason to like Ron Paul. Limbaugh hates him...

candyflip 08-18-2011 02:00 PM

The OPs nickname sucks. I always think he's someone else. :1orglaugh

I know I'm not the only one.

IllTestYourGirls 08-18-2011 02:07 PM

The bankers dont want him, the MSM does not want him, Rush does not want him. How much more proof he is what we need? lol

stinkyfingers 08-18-2011 02:15 PM

:1orglaugh

mafia_man 08-18-2011 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stinkyfingers (Post 18364761)

The media loves him?

I seen a Daily Show clip were he wasn't mentioned at all by the mainstream media channels.

porno jew 08-18-2011 02:49 PM

"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them."

porno jew 08-18-2011 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 18364781)
The OPs nickname sucks. I always think he's someone else. :1orglaugh

I know I'm not the only one.

reminds me of a certain depressed reborn christian.

stinkyfingers 08-18-2011 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 18363834)
Ron Paul's plan for health care reform in 2006

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul339.html

Lowering the Cost of Health Care

by Ron Paul
by Ron Paul


DIGG THIS

As a medical doctor, I've seen first-hand how bureaucratic red tape interferes with the doctor-patient relationship and drives costs higher. The current system of third-party payers takes decision-making away from doctors, leaving patients feeling rushed and worsening the quality of care. Yet health insurance premiums and drug costs keep rising. Clearly a new approach is needed. Congress needs to craft innovative legislation that makes health care more affordable without raising taxes or increasing the deficit. It also needs to repeal bad laws that keep health care costs higher than necessary.

We should remember that HMOs did not arise because of free-market demand, but rather because of government mandates. The HMO Act of 1973 requires all but the smallest employers to offer their employees HMO coverage, and the tax code allows businesses ? but not individuals ? to deduct the cost of health insurance premiums. The result is the illogical coupling of employment and health insurance, which often leaves the unemployed without needed catastrophic coverage.

While many in Congress are happy to criticize HMOs today, the public never hears how the present system was imposed upon the American people by federal law. As usual, government intervention in the private market failed to deliver the promised benefits and caused unintended consequences, but Congress never blames itself for the problems created by bad laws. Instead, we are told more government ? in the form of ?universal coverage? ? is the answer. But government already is involved in roughly two-thirds of all health care spending, through Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs.

For decades, the U.S. healthcare system was the envy of the entire world. Not coincidentally, there was far less government involvement in medicine during this time. America had the finest doctors and hospitals, patients enjoyed high-quality, affordable medical care, and thousands of private charities provided health services for the poor. Doctors focused on treating patients, without the red tape and threat of lawsuits that plague the profession today. Most Americans paid cash for basic services, and had insurance only for major illnesses and accidents. This meant both doctors and patients had an incentive to keep costs down, as the patient was directly responsible for payment, rather than an HMO or government program.

The lesson is clear: when government and other third parties get involved, health care costs spiral. The answer is not a system of outright socialized medicine, but rather a system that encourages everyone ? doctors, hospitals, patients, and drug companies ? to keep costs down. As long as ?somebody else? is paying the bill, the bill will be too high.

The following are bills Congress should pass to reduce health care costs and leave more money in the pockets of families:

HR 3075 provides truly comprehensive health care reform by allowing families to claim a tax credit for the rising cost of health insurance premiums. With many families now spending close to $1000 or even more for their monthly premiums, they need real tax relief ? including a dollar-for-dollar credit for every cent they spend on health care premiums ? to make medical care more affordable.

HR 3076 is specifically designed to address the medical malpractice crisis that threatens to drive thousands of American doctors ? especially obstetricians ? out of business. The bill provides a dollar-for-dollar tax credit that permits consumers to purchase "negative outcomes" insurance prior to undergoing surgery or other serious medical treatments. Negative outcomes insurance is a novel approach that guarantees those harmed receive fair compensation, while reducing the burden of costly malpractice litigation on the health care system. Patients receive this insurance payout without having to endure lengthy lawsuits, and without having to give away a large portion of their award to a trial lawyer. This also drastically reduces the costs imposed on physicians and hospitals by malpractice litigation. Under HR 3076, individuals can purchase negative outcomes insurance at essentially no cost.

HR 3077 makes it more affordable for parents to provide health care for their children. It creates a $500 per child tax credit for medical expenses and prescription drugs that are not reimbursed by insurance. It also creates a $3,000 tax credit for dependent children with terminal illnesses, cancer, or disabilities. Parents who are struggling to pay for their children's medical care, especially when those children have serious health problems or special needs, need every extra dollar.

HR 3078 is commonsense, compassionate legislation for those suffering from cancer or other terminal illnesses. The sad reality is that many patients battling serious illnesses will never collect Social Security benefits ? yet they continue to pay into the Social Security system. When facing a medical crisis, those patients need every extra dollar to pay for medical care, travel, and family matters. HR 3078 waives the employee portion of Social Security payroll taxes (or self-employment taxes) for individuals with documented serious illnesses or cancer. It also suspends Social Security taxes for primary caregivers with a sick spouse or child. There is no justification or excuse for collecting Social Security taxes from sick individuals who literally are fighting for their lives.

August 23, 2006



.:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

looks like the change everyone voted for

stinkyfingers 08-19-2011 10:34 AM


V_RocKs 08-19-2011 01:09 PM

He is a God among men...

Ethersync 08-19-2011 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 18366788)
He is a God among men...

And you are the new Fatfoo?

stinkyfingers 08-19-2011 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18364878)
"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them."

"The truth requires no questions." - Gary Busey


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123