GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   another idiot Bill O'Reilly (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1036925)

grumpy 09-06-2011 01:27 AM

another idiot Bill O'Reilly
 
Burned!!!

http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/1353...et_there_.html

Harmon 09-06-2011 02:55 AM

http://i.imgur.com/7NBkY.gifhttp://i.imgur.com/7NBkY.gifhttp://i.imgur.com/7NBkY.gifhttp://i.imgur.com/7NBkY.gif

BIGTYMER 09-06-2011 03:14 AM

Can't view it on my iPhone. 

wehateporn 09-06-2011 03:28 AM

Definitely not a good guy

Odin 09-06-2011 06:27 AM

Love Colbert.

12clicks 09-06-2011 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumpy (Post 18405968)

um, here in america, colbert is a comedian.
thats a guy who tells jokes for a living.
for the dutch: a joke is something that makes you laugh. generally something you made up.

directfiesta 09-06-2011 07:01 AM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Babaganoosh 09-06-2011 07:04 AM

It's sad when the comedians on Comedy Central are more accurate and reputable than major news program hosts.

vsex 09-06-2011 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babaganoosh (Post 18406428)
It's sad when the comedians on Comedy Central are more accurate and reputable than major news program hosts.

yep, and consistently so over the last 10 years :thumbsup

grumpy 09-06-2011 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18406414)
um, here in america, colbert is a comedian.
thats a guy who tells jokes for a living.
for the dutch: a joke is something that makes you laugh. generally something you made up.

and your point is???

L-Pink 09-06-2011 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vsex (Post 18406554)
yep, and consistently so over the last 10 years :thumbsup

What's amazing is the high level of political guests Jon Stewart has on his show.

.

Coup 09-06-2011 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18406414)
generally something you made up.

12clicks: "Bill O'Reilly? A bible thumping moron? nah, Colbert made that up."


Fucking joke, indeed.

Slappin Fish 09-06-2011 08:02 AM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

12clicks 09-06-2011 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumpy (Post 18406559)
and your point is???

that here in america, intelligent people concern themselves with facts, not satire.:thumbsup

12clicks 09-06-2011 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18406565)
12clicks: "Bill O'Reilly? A bible thumping moron? nah, Colbert made that up."


Fucking joke, indeed.

son, don't you have a school bus to catch?

drmadcat 09-06-2011 10:12 AM

i like them both

grumpy 09-06-2011 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18406924)
that here in america, intelligent people concern themselves with facts, not satire.:thumbsup

you mean when you invade Iraq for example?

12clicks 09-06-2011 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumpy (Post 18406970)
you mean when you invade Iraq for example?

yes. a conquered enemy who was violating their surrender agreement and had WMDs that we sold to them.
the pretend confusion by the dopey left is cute. Especially from a totally impotent part of the world.

12clicks 09-06-2011 10:43 AM

oh, I'm sorry. did you mean the first time when we were protecting an ally?

Cherry7 09-06-2011 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18406993)
and had WMDs .
.

Facts just don't feature in your world....

Coup 09-06-2011 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18406929)
son, don't you have a school bus to catch?

Watching you blindly defend an absolute moron is hilarious. I like that you cling to your own ideology so tightly that it leads to situations like this. God damn it makes for some good entertainment.

_Richard_ 09-06-2011 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18406995)
oh, I'm sorry. did you mean the first time when we were protecting an ally?

after they got invaded for slant drilling?

12clicks 09-06-2011 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 18407074)
after they got invaded for slant drilling?

yeah, thats it. :1orglaugh

_Richard_ 09-06-2011 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407082)
yeah, thats it. :1orglaugh

it seems like you're implying it was something else

Coup 09-06-2011 11:28 AM

Enough of the Iraq invasion derail. can we get back to 12clicks using his "superior" intellect to defend abject idiocy? That's the funny part.

12clicks 09-06-2011 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7 (Post 18407015)
Facts just don't feature in your world....

come now, silly kid.

here are the facts.
iraq used chemical weapons on the kurds. iraq was suspected of having chemical weapons by the UK. The UN special commission to determine that iraq no longer had weapons of mass destruction was stonewalled, lied to, harassed, etc.

now those are the facts, child. those of you on the left want to pretend that saddam hussein was the good guy and GWB was evil. Thats ok, its what makes your kind irrelevant.

12clicks 09-06-2011 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18407127)
Enough of the Iraq invasion derail. can we get back to 12clicks using his "superior" intellect to defend abject idiocy? That's the funny part.

I suggest you look around the hole your parents let their adult child live in before you talk about abject idiocy. :1orglaugh

Coup 09-06-2011 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407132)
I suggest you look around the hole your parents let their adult child live in before you talk about abject idiocy. :1orglaugh

Never stop being you, 12clicks :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

12clicks 09-06-2011 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 18407084)
it seems like you're implying it was something else

son, I understand in your world, Saddam was a truthful hero but in the real world, him accusing kuwait does not mean its true.
Here in reality, intelligent people understand that kuwait was not "slant drilling"
have a read, dopey:

"""In 1988, Iraq's then Oil Minister, Issam al-Chalabi, stressed a further reduction in the crude oil production quota of OPEC members so as to end the 1980s oil glut.[11] Chalabi argued that higher oil prices would help Iraq increase its revenues and pay back its US$60 billion debt.[11] However, given its large downstream petroleum industry, Kuwait was less concerned about the prices of crude oil and in 1989, Kuwait requested OPEC to increase the country's total oil production ceiling by 50% to 1.35 million bpd.[12] Throughout much of the 1980s, Kuwait's oil production was considerably above its mandatory OPEC quota and this had prevented a further increase in crude oil prices.[12] A lack of consensus among OPEC members undermined Iraq's efforts to end the oil glut and consequently prevented the recovery of its war-crippled economy.[13] According to former Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz, "every US$1 drop in the price of a barrel of oil caused a US$1 billion drop in Iraq's annual revenues triggering an acute financial crisis in Baghdad."[9] It was estimated that between 1985 and 1989, Iraq lost US$14 billion a year due to Kuwait's oil price strategy.[14] Kuwait's refusal to decrease its oil production was viewed by Iraq as an act of aggression against it.
The increasingly tense relations between Iraq and Kuwait where further aggravated when Iraq alleged that Kuwait was slant-drilling across the international border into Iraq's Rumaila field. The dispute over Rumaila field started in 1960 when an Arab League declaration marked the Iraq-Kuwait border 2 miles north of the southern-most tip of the Rumaila field.[15] During the Iran?Iraq War, Iraqi oil drilling operations in Rumaila declined while Kuwait's operations increased. In 1989, Iraq accused Kuwait of using "advanced drilling techniques" to exploit oil from its share of the Rumaila field. Iraq estimated that US$2.4 billion worth of Iraqi oil was "stolen" by Kuwait and demanded compensation.[16] Kuwait dismissed the accusations as a false Iraqi ploy to justify military action against it. Several foreign firms working in the Rumaila field also dismissed Iraq's slant-drilling claims as a "smokescreen to disguise Iraq's more ambitious intentions".[15]
On July 25, 1990, only a few days before the Iraqi invasion, OPEC officials said that Kuwait and United Arab Emirates had agreed to a proposal to limit daily oil output to 1.5 million barrels, thus potentially settling differences over oil policy between Kuwait and Iraq.[17] At the time of the settlement, more than 100,000 Iraqi troops were deployed along Iraq-Kuwait border and American officials expressed little indication of decline in tensions despite the OPEC settlement.[18]"""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Kuwait


its ok that saddam is your hero. its what you children do. look at all the Che tee shirts out there.

12clicks 09-06-2011 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18407149)
Never stop being you, 12clicks :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

as long as my detractors live with mommy, there's really no need.:1orglaugh

Coup 09-06-2011 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407155)
as long as my detractors live with mommy, there's really no need.:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yes, everyone who disagrees clearly lives with their parents. More of that superior intellect shining through I suppose.

12clicks 09-06-2011 11:41 AM

richard, I know that was a lot of reading so here's the main theme:

"""Several foreign firms working in the Rumaila field also dismissed Iraq's slant-drilling claims as a "smokescreen to disguise Iraq's more ambitious intentions"""

12clicks 09-06-2011 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18407158)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yes, everyone who disagrees clearly lives with their parents. More of that superior intellect shining through I suppose.

no but a quick glance thru your posts and threads you've started indicates a level of intelligence not equal to the task of supporting one's self in this world.

identifying trash thru their postings is a gift.
don't hate the messenger.:1orglaugh

grumpy 09-06-2011 12:02 PM

did i hit a nerve .ahhhhh
About your facts, keep on dreaming.

Caligari 09-06-2011 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407130)
come now, silly kid.

here are the facts.
iraq used chemical weapons on the kurds. iraq was suspected of having chemical weapons by the UK. The UN special commission to determine that iraq no longer had weapons of mass destruction was stonewalled, lied to, harassed, etc.

now those are the facts, child. those of you on the left want to pretend that saddam hussein was the good guy and GWB was evil. Thats ok, its what makes your kind irrelevant.

No genius, here are the facts-
The CIA - no WMDs in Iraq
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/...md-found-iraq/
"In his final word, the CIA?s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has ?gone as far as feasible? and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.
?After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,? wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall."

Now of course that's just the CIA saying that, I am quite aware that you will cling to your bullshit beliefs and whatever uber rightwing propaganda you aspire to for the rest of your uninformed life:thumbsup

KickAssJesse 09-06-2011 12:13 PM

Colbert's last line was champion status!

12clicks 09-06-2011 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumpy (Post 18407219)
did i hit a nerve .ahhhhh
About your facts, keep on dreaming.

yes, after 13yrs of schooling people on the boards, you....YOU'RE the one who hit a nerve.:1orglaugh

I'm just wondering about the thought process that makes someone post this.

I mean, honestly, I can't imagine a world where I'd ever care about one dutch TV (you do have TV there, don't you?) personality's take on another dutch TV personality.

yet you cared enough to post. oddly interesting

12clicks 09-06-2011 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligari (Post 18407257)
No genius, here are the facts-
The CIA - no WMDs in Iraq
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/...md-found-iraq/
"In his final word, the CIA?s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has ?gone as far as feasible? and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.
?After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted,? wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall."

Now of course that's just the CIA saying that, I am quite aware that you will cling to your bullshit beliefs and whatever uber rightwing propaganda you aspire to for the rest of your uninformed life:thumbsup

no, genius. Those are additional facts.
sadly for your hero saddam, he should have complied with the UN inspectors.

When you invade another country, are defeated completely and sign a surrender agreement, its not smart to then go back on your agreement. Especially when you're involved with terrorists and an attack has just taken place upon your conqueror.

do you own a Che shirt?:1orglaugh

Traffic Guru 09-06-2011 12:21 PM

How does one so important and busy finds time to post on this forum? In-between all those important projects he is working on? Pure talent.

Caligari 09-06-2011 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407276)
no, genius. Those are additional facts.
sadly for your hero saddam, he should have complied with the UN inspectors.

When you invade another country, are defeated completely and sign a surrender agreement, its not smart to then go back on your agreement. Especially when you're involved with terrorists and an attack has just taken place upon your conqueror.

do you own a Che shirt?:1orglaugh

do you own a George Bush dildo you shove up your ass nightly?

because at least you could verify a real "weapons of ass destruction" :1orglaugh

grumpy 09-06-2011 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407266)
yes, after 13yrs of schooling people on the boards, you....YOU'RE the one who hit a nerve.:1orglaugh

thats true, you do need more schooling.

grumpy 09-06-2011 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407276)
no, genius. Those are additional facts.
sadly for your hero saddam, he should have complied with the UN inspectors.

When you invade another country, are defeated completely and sign a surrender agreement, its not smart to then go back on your agreement. Especially when you're involved with terrorists and an attack has just taken place upon your conqueror.

do you own a Che shirt?:1orglaugh


so far off again, it ain't even funny. You have to brush up your learning and reading skills.

papill0n 09-06-2011 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407130)
come now, silly kid.

here are the facts.
iraq used chemical weapons on the kurds. iraq was suspected of having chemical weapons by the UK. The UN special commission to determine that iraq no longer had weapons of mass destruction was stonewalled, lied to, harassed, etc.

now those are the facts, child. those of you on the left want to pretend that saddam hussein was the good guy and GWB was evil. Thats ok, its what makes your kind irrelevant.

well lucky Bush went in and killed more innoncent people than were ever killed by sadam

no longer had WMD's ? when did they determine that ? oh yeah, after the invasion :1orglaugh

job well done you fucking dickhead go press your face onto some hot roofing iron

papill0n 09-06-2011 12:54 PM

12clicks :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

what a stupid fox news fueled middle aged fucking has been

go play in the sandbit you uneducated amoeba

12clicks 09-06-2011 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumpy (Post 18407303)
so far off again, it ain't even funny. You have to brush up your learning and reading skills.

all because you imagine.
:1orglaugh

12clicks 09-06-2011 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papill0n (Post 18407365)
12clicks :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

what a stupid fox news fueled middle aged fucking has been

go play in the sandbit you uneducated amoeba

look who's home from the day job, here to tell us how dumb I am!:1orglaugh

Coup 09-06-2011 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18407174)
no but a quick glance thru your posts and threads you've started indicates a level of intelligence not equal to the task of supporting one's self in this world.

identifying trash thru their postings is a gift.
don't hate the messenger.:1orglaugh

Knowing I've gotten under your skin enough to go digging through my past put a massive smile on my face. Thanks.

directfiesta 09-06-2011 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 18406924)
that here in america, intelligent people concern themselves with facts, not satire.:thumbsup

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

3 letters for you ... W M D

12clicks 09-06-2011 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 18407461)
Knowing I've gotten under your skin enough to go digging through my past put a massive smile on my face. Thanks.

:1orglaugh
now run in the other room and tell your mom you got under my skin.
she'll be as proud of you as ever!:1orglaugh

Coup 09-06-2011 01:53 PM

Troll goes in, Live with your parents joke comes out. Never a miscommunication. ROFL


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc