Juicyads - Get in here and explain this...
 

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?p=1846...1#post18468193

Doesn't look too good on your part guys.

I am staying neutral with this and parking right here.

bump for the day shift

And......Still not funny.

Is there a story behind this particular pic to back it up or are you just going on the basis that she looks underage?

you mad?

Most of the girls on that site are pretty questionable but none of them look like it would be impossible for them to be of age.
That being said, everything there and everything that site links to is like a textbook laundry list of shit most people don't want to be associated with.

I remember when I signed up for Juicy Ads, the first ad that loaded was a chick with dog.

Trust me, it's underage. That pic is from a small set that circulates the image sharing sites and all over the file sharing forums but because this image and another one do not show genitalia like the rest of the set do there are many cj/tgp/scraper sites that use one of the two images. So actually, they are legal to use if going by the letter of the law.. however.. I do feel bad for people who use juicyads, get served this image and know no better.

It's a company's responsibility to ensure nothing like this is served to clients. So.. that's why I think we all deserve an explanation as to why this image was used.

Under the basis that the girl IS underage. From the pics I've seen before from that set she is clearly 9, 10 or 11 at most. It's disgusting.

so, what are you saying?

Read the thread, this thread and figure it out. I'm not repeating myself lol

well it looks like the image is gone. I assume its either because it's a rotating iframe banner or they removed it. Either way I have no way to prove it as I refuse to try and find it to show anyone. I wont hunt for, link to or take screenshots of anyone underage. However it is in juicyads best interest to investigate the issue if they haven't already because as it stands, anyone who has concerns about being served these types of images will not use the product.

What are you saying, pussy boi?

You feel the need to create another thread, but no balls to spill the beans?

I wouldn't want to see that add on my site.

Sighhhh


A site that features teen younger themed porn has an ad hosted by juicyads. That ad is an underage (9-10-11 at most year old) posing on her bed. The image comes from a set that circulates file sharing sites, forums and imagefap quite often. The girl is clearly underage. The image chosen for their ad doesn't show anything illegal but the girl is still... a child. The image is now removed and/or rotated out. Either juicyads removed it or it's gone just by the way their iframe loader works.

I did not post (and will not) post a link to the site that featured it. It is already linked to by someone else in the thread I linked to on my first post in this thread you are reading right now. It loads my reply when you click it. Look at what I am replying about.

Does this cover everything?

So just an opinion then?

No. It's not an opinion. I have seen the entire set the image comes from. She is a child. No tits, no pubes, nothing. It is child. It's not just :looking young" it IS young. The girl is 3 foot nothing.

What the hell is wrong with you people?

I really shouldn't have wasted my time I guess.. carry on.

Well I haven't seen the image for starters. I am just trying to understand the basis for your allegations. Whether it was based on fact or not.

You may well be correct but I don't see anything to back it up.

Just stop it already with the fake outrage, that girl is NOT underage. That content has been around forever and resold a hundred times over, and the girl was over 18. Damn, people just love to pull the fake outrage card every chance they get...

I created a thread on this same subject. A couple of the sites in their network link to sites that should FLAT OUT NOT BE ASSOCIATED WITH ADULT PORNOGRAPHY. PERIOD. I've reported it and yet the sites remain online. :disgust

Oh well, what else can you do other than to let them know and warn others?

yeah because I wanna waste my time faking something and making myself liable for defamation of character just for shits and giggles..

Maybe you have it confused. the original thread was about another model with is older than 18,, someone else posted a link in the same thread that contains a nude child.

So what you're saying is you're a cosumer of these types of images? I mean you've seen the entire set, looked through the images one by one right?

Doesn't that make you a criminal?

Email me the URL of the ad image so we can take action. I still havent seen the ad you are talking about...

Also, posting multiple threads about something you are obviously passionate about doesn't help solve the issue. Especially when I and others might not visit this board daily. Contacting us directly is the way to go. OUr contact information is listed on our site, so please for future reference shoot me an email or message directly.

If you would have emailed me when you came upon this, I could have had an answer for you about 9 hour ago.

I am not sending a url to a child image in email, link or any form. all the info to investigate and find it yourselves is already in this that other thread (which i did not create so you cant say i created multiple threads)

Go to the page and refresh multiple times until you see the blonde in he ad spot that has 3 large banners side by side, or look at their ad display logs and you will find the url. Sorry guys. I am not posting it. It's illegal for me to do so where I reside and is in violation of gfy if I post it here.

But you have no problem looking at child images by your very own admission, right?

When a person clicks a 300 image gallery, all thumbs load right? well.. doesn't mean i clicked any images.. for example on imagefap it loads HUGE thumbs.. so you see everything without clicking. Scroll down some past the legal stuff and BAM it's right there. I close the window, set the cleaner on my system to wipe the cache drive and go do something else. i seen one image up close ONCE.. now that I know what it is I always close it. SO does that mean I am a consumer? No. So don't ever accuse me of consuming the stuff.

Jesus fucking christ man, I have a daughter. Last thing I would do is want to even see this shit. Hence why I am so godamn pissed that a "reputable" ad serving company allows shit like this to fall through the cracks. if I had one of them loading on my pages I would seriously kill someone.


Fucking ridiculous. Point out something that is wrong (that people have noticed for quite awhile now across different sites loading the ads and never got taken seriously) and I get accused of consuming the images.. fuck you.

Last time I ever point anything out to help anyone.

I don't really care what you trolls think about me but I'm tired of being attacked on it. i CANNOT and WILL NOT email this stuff to people at all. it's illegal to send/post or even save this stuff. So frig man. Can-it, get over it. juicyads knows how to track what image it is and where it was served It's up to them to decide if they want to take it seriously and do something about it or not.

The trolls can continue to say what they will. I come here for business and will keep it that way. Next time I will just close the window, clean my system and forget all about it.

I am done with this thread with this very post. If anyone wants to ban me for posting it without "proof", go ahead. I don't care what people think. I am a man of my word. I am more honest than most people I know and never ever ever would do anything to make someone look bad intentionally unless it's an exposure of events that I feel is deserved. Placing another company in a position of trust is huge when it comes to what is loaded on our sites. if this stuff makes it into peoples sites without it first being reviewed/deleted/moderated by those who serve the ads then they should be held responsible for when this happens. This is why I wanted them to explain it. I want to know why this could happen as I used to use their ad service and was going to re-add them eventually again. I am not accusing them of purposely adding it but merely dropping the ball and not paying attention to what goes through their ad server

I am much more productive at making people money, not at helping expose something wrong apparently lol

I keep refreshing the thread, but I still don't see this hysterical moron 'iwantchixx' banned yet. No CP found. Allegation denied - get rid of him...

Infact, just reading this thread title makes me want to not use JuicyAds. You've given them a bad name.

say what?

In many countries it's not illegal to only LOOK at cp.
Instead they have forbidden creation of, selling and distribution of as well as possession of it.
This then creates a grey area if you look at something online and a local copy is downloded to your computer, are you then in possession or have you only looked?

Not defending it in any way, just saying that the laws of many countries are not quite the same or even up to date.