![]() |
So how is XXX sunrise AD going for you?
I applied for 13 xxx domains in the Sunrise AD(omain) period, ICM promised they would inform between Oct 28 and Nov 8 whether we could get these domains or not but we haven't heard anything from them yet. In our account all domains have a "valid application" comment next to them which seems to be good to me, so what are they waiting for? Of all domains except one we're the only ones owning the domains as TLDs.
Anyone else went through the Sunrise AD procedure and heard anything good or bad from ICM? |
|
You actually fell for that shit?
Just like nobody wanted your .info, nobody will want your .XXX Go ahead and give Lawley close to $1,300/yr or whatever it is. That could have bought you some good traffic. |
I think I wasn't asking my question to those who think xxx sucks. That would be pretty pointless, wouldn't it?
|
I Love Tequila Sunrise:pimp
|
I bet some go to "auction".
|
http://yogaslavianarmy.files.wordpre...borat-flag.jpg
dotXXX, great success... just like dotMobi LOL |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What a fucking racket. No refunds given if you dont get the domains and multiple registars accepting registrations. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I checked into this for you. Overwhelming demand has forced us to extend the period for the validation agent by a few weeks, but if your applications are showing as accepted, it should be fine.
|
Quote:
And multiple registrars accepting registrations.... isn't it good then that there is only ONE registrar for .com domains then? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
By pre-reg you will lose your application fee (with Godaddy its $100 bucks), but they will refund the domain fee if you don't get the domain. |
Quote:
|
I have no interest. A domain is only what you make it.
|
Quote:
I waited to buy .asia domains once they opened it to the public, and was able to get great names. Of course now they are worthless and I have let them expire. I see the same scenario with .xxx |
you can't afford renewing your xxx domains each year
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
banning porn on all other tld's won't ever happen. |
Quote:
The extension will be what the authorities and google make of them. If THEY decide, the .xxx will be a giant moneymaker. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In theory you could sell good traffic for a little under what you'd make sending it to your own sites and avoid the headache of running something. In practice people sell hundreds of thousands or millions of hits that are absolute shit. Then you get into companies like GTS that try to sell their traffic to AFFILIATES. If an affiliate can make money sending your traffic directly to a sponsor then why the fuck wouldn't you just send your traffic to a sponsor to make more? Sigh. |
Quote:
And if sometime down the road the "authorities" decide we can no longer use .com (which I doubt will happen), then there will still be 100s of 1000s of .XXX to choose from, and then it will be what you make of it, like I said. |
Quote:
|
This is the number one hack of all time. Second, Acacia
FUCK YOU .XXX Shove it up where it belongs. Don't buy them, it's dangerous. It will be easy to create a ghetto after. You're complaining about signup ratios ? Wait til part 2 comes over ! |
Fuck .xxx !!!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I still think this is something that cannot be monitored since who the hell is going to be able to look at every domain or website for adult content. |
Quote:
|
someone else being fucked by the ever growing .XXX scam.
|
Quote:
If we find 1 single time anything that is against 1 of the many thousends of rules they will implement you will be banned for life from buying a .XXX domain again. In the meantime .XXX will be mandatory in the whole world. So your whole business will be worthless at any time they choose to execute a stupid rule they come up with. |
Quote:
It is doubtful that .XXX will ever become mandatory, and ICM certainly isn't doing anything to even promote that as an idea. What I really have a difficult time understanding is "So your whole business will be worthless at any time they choose to execute a stupid rule they come up with." Don't you think that the very idea, that a for-profit business would ever even consider intentionally doing anything to directly disenfranchise it's customer base, to be just a little bit ridiculous? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They always lure you with good rules and slowly implement more and more regulations which will dictate everything you do. Just like google, facebook, "democracy" etc etc. Thats why we have top stop this madness before it can be made mandatory indeed. Do us all a favour and stop your scam! What IS ridiculous is that you state yourself that your policys "FOR NOW" are this and that but you do know you will change this rules as soon as enough people have signed up for it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, I do state that those policies are "for now." For example, IFFOR still needs to come to a determination for procedure if existing policies are violated. That in itself will eventually have to become part of policy. It does not however, mean that random policies will be enacted that will be detrimental to ICM and disenfranchise its customers. That would be to no ones benefit. |
Shit is all fucked up :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We are being tricked in democracy and we get to vote, and slowly but by pre planned plan the system is becoming a dictatorship. While you still can vote your vote doesnt mean anything the system does whatever you want and whatever you vote. It is very clear just by your intentions that you do want .XXX to become mandatory whatever you say does not matter since you and your organisation speaks with a double toung. You say you THINK .XXX will not be mandatory therefore using this as argument isnt valid. However you or your organisation states that it will be easy for parents to block porn by simply blocking .XXX sites on a PC, network or country. Now this has totaly no use as only a small part of the sites is actualy on this .XXX extention. So either you lie that you do not think .XXX will be mandatory or you lie by stating that anyone can block porn by blocking .XXX. |
Quote:
Our intentions are simply to run a successful business venture, both for ICM and for .XXX domain owners, not to make our product mandatory. I said it was doubtful that .XXX would become mandatory, and that ICM is in no way promoting that it should be, so it's an entirely valid argument. ICM's view on adult content and it's accessibility is quite clear. Rather than quote several long paragraphs of text, may I point you to about dot xxx and the subfolder of the same name? Site labeling will make it easy for parents wishing to keep adult content away from their minor children will find it very easy to block the entire domain. Consumers wishing to find specific content that is of interest to them will find that easier to do as well, with clear and precise domain names as well as on search dot xxx. If I didn't answer your concerns, please forgive me, but I'm having some difficulty understanding your argument. :( |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc