GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Photos and videos leaked from animal testing lab (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1048779)

EukerVoorn 12-06-2011 02:11 PM

Photos and videos leaked from animal testing lab
 
Even the people working in these labs can't cope with the horror and insanity anymore:

"A distraught whistleblower from Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories (SNBL), a notorious Everett, Washington-based animal testing conglomerate, recently contacted PETA to reveal shocking allegations of mistreatment of animals used in painful and lethal experiments."

Disturbing Photos Leaked From Laboratory!

Lykos 12-06-2011 03:12 PM

I better don't click.... fuck...

wehateporn 12-06-2011 03:17 PM

Very sad

_Richard_ 12-06-2011 03:17 PM

wootz, time to play 'how long does the whistlerblower last'

bonus for correct time of day

Flow 12-06-2011 03:20 PM

I happened to be watching a clip from "The Doctors" my wife was watching and the main dude made a good point....

Which is worse, letting 1000's of kids die as they are the test subjects or test on a few animals first.

Seems pretty logical but I know the PETA nut cases will argue that it is never right to test on animals even if it means millions of people will die - sigh!

Failed 12-06-2011 03:23 PM

Same old argument. "Are the animals more important than people?"

Failed 12-06-2011 03:26 PM

It's just a shame we haven't advanced past having to test on animals. Or, at least advanced to the point that testing on animals becomes a lot safer for the animals and doesn't end up causing them pain or death.

A 17 year old gamer created a particle that's consider a revolutionary breakthrough in the treatment of cancer. Yet, we can't figure out how to get past testing on animals. Or, we don't want to spend the money to do so.

ottopottomouse 12-06-2011 04:18 PM

I hope nobody at peta ever gets sick and has to refuse treatment on ethical grounds.

L-Pink 12-06-2011 04:29 PM

We should preform tests on criminals and illegal immigrants not animals.

.

EukerVoorn 12-06-2011 10:02 PM

These tests aren't performed for making better medicines for people. It's all about money. When you get cancer, the doctors will give you meds that are being pushed down their throats by the multi-billion pharmacy industry. And it's already proven that animals differ too much from people to get reliable results from these tests. If you get cancer and you don't get the option to chose for meds that haven't been tested on animals, it's because such medicines do not exist, and PETA isn't to blame for that, the pharmacy industry is to blame for that. Same goes for driving a car, drinking coffee, eating chocolate, smoking cigarettes, all that has been tested on animals. So people who want to refuse using meds and products that have been tested on animals won't have a life. Now who is to blame for that?

Anyone thinking these tests are crucial: go offer yourself as a volunteer in one of those labs. Those animals didn't chose to be there.

Spunky 12-06-2011 10:13 PM

I hate watching clips like this.I wish there was a better way to avoid these poor animals to suffer like this

EukerVoorn 12-06-2011 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flow (Post 18611666)
I happened to be watching a clip from "The Doctors" my wife was watching and the main dude made a good point....

Which is worse, letting 1000's of kids die as they are the test subjects or test on a few animals first.

Seems pretty logical but I know the PETA nut cases will argue that it is never right to test on animals even if it means millions of people will die - sigh!

No it's the other way around, 1000s of kids are dying daily because we still rely on animal testing for producing better medicines. And they're not testing on "a few animals" first, they're testing on millions of animals worldwide on a daily bases. The same tests are being duplicated over and over again in indidividual countries, if that would be centralized it that would save misery for millions of animals already, but it's all about money, "life science" is a commercial industry so nobody wants to shut down their money generating labs.

Read what a well respected American scientist says about this: Ray Greek on medical research

lucas131 12-06-2011 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 18611820)
We should preform tests on criminals and illegal immigrants not animals.

.

wow ... and we can hunt some americans also ... :)

SmokeyTheBear 12-07-2011 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn (Post 18612507)
No it's the other way around, 1000s of kids are dying daily because we still rely on animal testing for producing better medicines

explain how 1000's of kids per day would not die by stopping animal testing

EukerVoorn 12-07-2011 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18612758)
explain how 1000's of kids per day would not die by stopping animal testing

I didn't write that, so you explain it. I wrote this:

"No it's the other way around, 1000s of kids are dying daily because we still rely on animal testing for producing better medicines"

We need to continue testing, but not on rabbits and cats, because rabbits and cats aren't humans, so chemicals that prove to cure diseases in rabbits due to testing may not work or even do harm inside humans, and the other way around. There are plently of examples of medicines that were approved after extensive testing on animals, came on the market, and killed people. Medical science has now become so advance that current and new techniques need something much more reliable for testing.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc