hahahahahaha - Palin endoreses Ron Paul
 

yeah, that figures.

http://www.examiner.com/finance-exam...ould-listen-to

Ouch. That's like the kiss of death.

Sarah Palin didn't actually endorse Ron Paul, although I'm sure that won't stop the Cult of Paul from claiming otherwise (it's what they do):

http://punditkitchen.files.wordpress...aphjamming.png

ADG

You don't think they are smart enough to figure that is an endorsement they do not want?

The GOP over the past couple years has been like Michael Jackson. Just when you think you've seen it all, something crazier happens.

Ron Paul doesn't have the alliances in congress to get his plans done even if he were elected president. For that reason he is a total waste of a candidate. His supporters first need to elect a bunch of libertarians to congress for a libertarian president to have any meaningful power, but none of them want to face that reality.

I think Gingrich paid her to say it.

.

She wants him to lose obviously.

I can understand why she doesn't want him to win by why do something so nasty like
this?

:1orglaugh

You are one of the few on GFY that seems to get it.


Good chance.

Effectiveness?

No, Palin did not endorse Ron Paul. Try re-reading what she actually said in the article you linked to:

Personally I can not stand the woman but I think the last person she endorsed was this guy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rand_Paul

I wonder how he did in the republican primary?


PS she did not endorse Ron.

Anyone that thinks this would hurt Ron Paul is crazy. This could only help him, period.

I keep seeing bytes with Rand Paul come up and he makes a lot of sense. I foresee him becoming a serious presidential candidate in about 12 years.

If Obama wins, I see him running in '16.

Sadly, Obama would have to rape a white chick to lose this time around. The Republicans have no one. I don't know that Rand Paul has enough experience or is known well enough to get the nomination in '16. Of course, that did not stop Obama, so who knows. I saw Obama as a candidate when he spoke at the DNC in 2004. I thought he needed 8-12 years. Not 4. We got screwed. Same thing would happen with Rand Paul.

Now, make him a Veep in 2016 and he would be ready for 2024.

Rand Paul, seriously? :1orglaugh

Jeb Bush / Palin is more likely.

Paul and Palin would make a great combo.

:)

For what?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_WigxWmT65J...itical0182.png

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_mBasfSNyWb...erviceSign.jpg

ADG

If you are a real capitalist and do not want the government involved in your private business, Ron Paul is the candidate.

Why dont Bachmann, Perry, Santorum dropout already? They are wasting air for the candidates who actually have a chance. The only 3 who do are Paul, Romney and Gingrich.