Newt Gingrich Just Lost The Woman's Vote - Ex Wife Says He Asked Her For An Open Marriage! [VIDEO]
 

Newt Gingrich's second wife, Marianne, says the GOP presidential candidate asked her for an "open marriage" after he became involved with the woman who became his third and current wife.

Marianne Gingrich told ABC News that Gingrich wanted the then-Callista Bisek, his current wife, as his mistress while keeping Marianne Gingrich as his wife. She said he admitted at the time to a six-year affair with Callista.

Marianne Gingrich, who says she refused the request for an open marriage, said Newt told her that "Callista doesn't care what I do." She said he complained that "you want me all to yourself."

Marianne Gingrich said she eventually learned that Callista was often listening when Newt called her at night from Washington to say goodnight and tell her he loved her. The calls were taking place, she said, while Gingrich was leading the charge to impeach President Bill Clinton for misleading Congress about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

Marianne Gingrich, a conservative Republican, told ABC News she is coming forward now so that voters have a fuller picture of the GOP presidential candidate. Her interview is set to air in full this evening, just two days before the January 21 South Carolina primary that could rejuvenate or sink Gingrich's presidential bid.

Marianne Gingrich also said in the interview that Newt divorced her within months of her diagnosis with Multiple Sclerosis, after he had heard a doctor advise her to avoid stress. She said that Newt, who divorced his first wife after a cancer diagnosis, became involved with her before his first divorce was final.

In a separate interview with the Washington Post, Marianne Gingrich said that when Gingrich asked for the divorce in 1999, she asked if there was anyone else.

"He was quiet. Within two seconds, when he didn't immediately answer, I knew," she said. Gingrich would go on to give a speech the next day in which he posed rhetorical questions concerning when liberals talk about values.

"How could he ask me for a divorce on Monday and within 48 hours give a speech on family values and talk about how people treat people?" she told the Post. She said Gingrich has not spoken to her since they divorved.

Newt Gingrich and his campaign have not responded to his ex-wife's comments.Before details of the interviews emerged, he told NBC that "Intruding into family things that are more than a decade old is simply wrong."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...riage-with-me/



First Rick Perry drops out today, now this. No woman is going to vote for Gingrich after seeing this, especially not the Christian Conservatives, not a chance LOL- Gingrich is toast. No fucking way he could compete in the general election with 50% of the country (regardless of party affiliation) not supporting him, much less secure the nomination. He would have womens groups HOUNDING him over this the whole way.

It's down to Romney, Santorum and Ron Paul. Santorum will be out of cash soon and has less chance to win in the general than even Newt does. Even brain dead Republicans realize this.

Ron Paul is in a statistical dead heat with Romney against Obama in the latest polls:

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1054081

Like it or not guys, your choice is Romney or Paul if you want to get rid of Obama, and frankly Ron Paul does way better with Independents than Romney does, not to mention Ron Paul supporters will just write the Congressman's name in whether he is the nominee or not. Either way Romney looses.

It's Paul or Obama. Romney cant win. That's the simple fact. The numbers simply are not there if even a fraction of Ron Paul supporters write his name in which they will guaranteed, 3rd party or no 3rd party run. It's time to face facts. The only way you are rid of Obama is with Ron Paul. Accept it.

Bit more than getting a BJ from a co worker. LOL

Well, I think it is one thing to have an affair. It is an entirely something else to have the BALLS to go to your wife and say I want to have a mistress on the side LOL

I am not even saying on a personal level I am some conservative that is so offended. I am simply pointing out that from a woman's point of view that is really something completely verboten and this fact alone would preclude women of either party from supporting him.

There is no way he can recover from this. And with rick Perry announcing he is out today, that only leaves 3 choices and Santorum is a mouth breather, literally. He has zero chance, so it is down to Paul or Romney. End of story.

Gingrich and Santorum didn't even get on the ballot for Virginia: http://articles.cnn.com/2012-01-13/p..._s=PM:POLITICS

Paul and Romney did.

Business as usual in Washington DC. Both sides do it.

ya ever notice how its always their dicks that get the "family values" spouting republicans in trouble?


Obama is loving this....4 more years.

You're projecting. Just because you dont have a problem with it and I dont have a problem with it, is not the same thing as saying that Christian Conservative women wont have a problem with it. Get real.

You're conveniently forgetting... denying a woman (Paula Jones) a fair trial, the highest law enforcement official in the country subverting the legal process, perjury, lying to a grand jury, subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice, abuse of power by the President, Slick Willy's disbarment, etc..

Hypocracy is alive and well and living in Washington:pimp

A sour grapes ex-wife. What a shock.

Wouldn't surprise me at all. Newt's a fucking scumbag.

I'll bet you think Richard Nixon was a swell guy.

You can downplay it all you like but I bet you women voters wont see it that way :1orglaugh

Newt is toast-

That was nothing to do with popularity with voters.

No shit sherlock. :) The point is that Gingrich didn't make the ballot for Virginia. Therefore, no delegates for him from that state.

You're right. Their falure to get the required signatures from "supporters" had nothing to do with their popularity with said voters LOL