why not just give iran nukes
 

at some point they will have them.

so lets just give them a few.

they are never going to use them.

then we can all be friends again.

I'm going to ask Damien coz I'm sure he knows ...

Damien, is this guy really clever but just pretends to be thick so he can troll GFY?

I'll also ask Gary, coz if anyone knows it will be Gary!

Gary, this is bloke really a rocket scientist from the future sent back in time to mess with our minds?

There's GOT to be a story behind this. I refuse to accept that ANYONE can be as thick as this plank!!!

I don't believe that Iran is developing such weapons, it just another reason to make war for Iran's oil ...

If you like paying $20.00 a gallon for gas, give em a nuke.

Iran cannot be expected to behave rationally.

I spotted a moron.

there is a lot of evidence that they are not making nukes.

they are shear muslims and its against there rules.

thbe truth is only very few countries can lopaunch nukes with sucsess (china, usa, russia) as you need lots of them otherwise these days missiles can blow them out of the sky.

the best way to launch a nuke strike is with subs as you can get close up to loaunch.

they are an old weapon.

the other problem is they may not work. this is why they test them all the time.

a long range nuke strike is pointless as they would be spotted and plenty of time to knock them out of the sky.

no country in there right mind would use them.

in fact even russia does not parade them as they used to.

the truth is, in the next election chances are things will change.

they are NO threat.

its all talk, and not wanting to back down.

the danger is this esculates and becomes a war.

give them nukes and it stopes the esculation.

Iran will be attacked, not sure just when, but 21.12.2012 sound like nice date for it

its against sheaa musilm religion to have them.

also when irans leaders speak, its been said the transation is different to what they are saying.

its been proved that by idipendent traslaters that some media have altered the speeches.

there is lots of scare mugering going on.

get spell check you daft fuck!

iran is a complex country.

the people are young (youngest of any country due to wars) and middle class, modern, love mp3 players and stuff.

the goverment is made up of a puppet head, with religiouse leaders in charge. goverment seems split, and i think many were recently sacked as they want a liberal goverment.

its also a shear muslim country - and thats different to that of those who acctaced the twin towers. while it was reported in usa news they had recently joined forces, in fact shear muslims are in conflic with them and do not want much to do with them.

iran at the moment has high unpemploment putting huge presers on the goverement.

also the trade embargoes is having a big impact.

What the fuck is a shear muslim?

Just give them one attached to a faulty rocket so when they do decide to use it it's like a duff firework and blows up in their face.

transparent. a bit like pacman ghosts.

hahahahahahahaha ... and the US does? :error:321GFY

on top of this you have all the external polotics, with isrial, usa elections, other middle eaern countries who are not fans of iran......

then you have the hystoric problems of the west creating the goverments of certain counrtries.

so you give iran 5 nukes and give them anty nukes millisiles. and you do the same for isrial. thus stalemate.

ps

which country is it that has used nukes?

does anyone realy see iran as a threat?

i mean the leader went to the usa on a jolly trip a year or so ago and even did a christmass speech for ch4 tv (UK), so he is hardly a usa and uk hater.

no its simple

you make sure they use gps

if they launch them, the usa can turn the system off.

its another reason nukes are pointless as if you use jps the usa will just turn it off, and without jps its a pain to direct nukes.

that's SHEER ... he's talking about sheep obviously!!! :)

That would be a sheer muslim:1orglaugh

You're German, right? At least you can take comfort in the fact that most of our foreign policies have the tacit backing of your country's politicians, and that we'll never authorize drone strikes on, say, Berlin....well, unless you people go apeshit and try to take over Europe again.

i am not sure the correct spelling:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shia_Islam

then you have sunni which i belive those who attact the twin towers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunni_Islam

if i remeber there was a conflict with them in iran and many on one side were killed.

i am not realy into religion so i cannot tell you much.

but i know that when the usa media sugested conection between iran and those who attact the twin towers that it was not likly. though they have some political views that are the same, they have huge differences.

Now this is why many belive iran is not, nor would make nuclear weapons. even by those aposed to iran are saying they are not:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Kha...uclear_weapons

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued a fatwa saying the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons was forbidden under Islam.[49] The fatwa was cited in an official statement by the Iranian government at an August 2005 meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna.[50]

Iran's nuclear program has been a subject of international debate for decades. The Iranian government claims the purpose of its nuclear development is to produce electricity, while some western countries accuse it of trying to create nuclear weapons.

Iran is run by a bunch of religious zealots who think they're accountable only to God, and there's no real guarantee that any nuclear weapon they could build would be used for deterrence only. There's a big difference between a state that builds one as an equalizer against a far more powerful and belligerent neighbor, and a state that builds one for more equivocal reasons. It can be argued that the U.S. is precisely that "more powerful and belligerent neighbor," but I don't think that's a very strong argument at present.

And, yes, there are Shi'ite terrorist groups, Hezbollah being the main one.

of course they will use nukes...

in some ways you could say that about the usa as so much polotics is based on religion. ie, abortion. usa has a lot of religion within its polotics that is not found say in most western countries.

Also uk has a few people in the top rancks of church on egland that sit in the house of lords. this has been often poited out and questioned why the church of england has such power in todays world.

the thing about iran is that in the last elections they belive the vote was riged and so i am not sure they will get away with it in the next elections.

but as i say, these 'religious zealots' belive nuclear weapons to be a huge sin, so in that respect its unlikly they will want them.

nukes are against there religion.

and even if it was not, why would they use them? if they did they could not defend themselves from attacts. it would be the end of them.

they would not risk even using them as they may not even work, and thats if they are not shot down.

but the key thing is, its against there belifes.

its like the pope being a swinger. it just is not going to happen.

We are not a government run by religious zealots, not by a long shot. You cannot even begin to compare the few right-wing politicians in the US that pander to their religious base with theocratic regimes in the middle-east, that's insane.

While people can argue the geopolitics of it back and forth all day, in the end common sense eventually has to reassert itself and say: It's probably not a good idea to let a bunch of religious zealots get nuclear weapons.


Where are you getting this information from?

I just don't understand why the leaders of some countries have to be assholes. Look at Saddam, he had it all there and if he just would've complied a little and let those inspectors look where they wanted, when they wanted, he'd still be alive in his own country. If I knew by me not complying with something, that's eventually gonna lead to someone storming into my country and pulling me out of power, I sure as hell would let them do their inspections. Iran will soon find out the same hard way.

Saddam had the misfortune of pulling his antics at the worst possible time, really. Iran knows something that a legion of tinpot dictators and not-so-nice regimes around the world have known for ages - contrary to the assertions of so many people whose only real experience with American foreign policy is the Afghan/Iraq wars, it is incredibly difficult to get the U.S. off its ass in favor of a military solution to anything. You can storm American embassies, blow them up, attack U.S. navy ships, threaten someone under the American security umbrella, kidnap American civilians, and still not get anywhere close to provoking war with the United States. It took an attack on the scale of 9/11 to get the U.S. into Afghanistan and Iraq in any serious fashion, and Saddam just happened to be saber-rattling around that time. Saber-rattling and even outright provocation isn't enough to do it though.