GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Tube Uploads (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1058916)

dgraves 02-25-2012 02:35 AM

Tube Uploads
 
i've been finding a lot of my gloryhole videos on various tube sites with the watermark removed.

would a so called "user" really take the time to re-encode the video just to cut out the watermark?

CurrentlySober 02-25-2012 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 18780274)
i've been finding a lot of my gloryhole videos on various tube sites with the watermark removed.

would a so called "user" really take the time to re-encode the video just to cut out the watermark?

No, the tube itself, would take the time to use 'Built in' tech software, to do it on behalf of the 'user'...

V_RocKs 02-25-2012 02:47 AM

Some users will because they know it won't get accepted with one.

dgraves 02-25-2012 02:52 AM

the scum just keep getting scummier! it's bad enough to steal you shit and post it on a tube but to make sure you don't get any credit or traffic from it really spools me up.

seeandsee 02-25-2012 04:16 AM

he is one good user , in terms of tube site owners :))

The Ghost 02-25-2012 04:19 AM

You mean cropped? Some tubes mask part of the video to "hide" the watermark. Fight this by watermarking in each corner of the vid for a 1/4th of the vid

Fletch XXX 02-25-2012 04:25 AM

Nah never happen tubes are our friends

BIGTYMER 02-25-2012 04:31 AM

I like when they put their URL over your watermark. :1orglaugh

DWB 02-25-2012 07:29 AM

dgraves, check your ICQ.

gideongallery 02-25-2012 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 18780290)
the scum just keep getting scummier! it's bad enough to steal you shit and post it on a tube but to make sure you don't get any credit or traffic from it really spools me up.

maybe you should have made the argument that the exist of the watermark proves that the content is infringing then.

You created a situation where tube sites decided to not accept videos with watermarks

which in turn caused users to remove them so that they could upload them.

porno jew 02-25-2012 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18781000)
maybe you should have made the argument that the exist of the watermark proves that the content is infringing then.

You created a situation where tube sites decided to not accept videos with watermarks

which in turn caused users to remove them so that they could upload them.

fuck are you delusional. that's is not even remotely why they remove watermarks.

gideongallery 02-25-2012 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18781007)
fuck are you delusional. that's is not even remotely why they remove watermarks.

so explain it then

why do the end users remove the watermark.

Sly 02-25-2012 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18781000)
maybe you should have made the argument that the exist of the watermark proves that the content is infringing then.

You created a situation where tube sites decided to not accept videos with watermarks

which in turn caused users to remove them so that they could upload them.

I lock my doors every night in hopes of a break-in. I can't wait for someone to steal my TV.

gideongallery 02-25-2012 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 18781027)
I lock my doors every night in hopes of a break-in. I can't wait for someone to steal my TV.

difference is that since fair use existed, a watermark is NOT proof of infringement.

It was as valid as saying your guilty of theft because the sky is blue.

dgraves 02-25-2012 01:09 PM

moving the watermark around from corner to corner sounds like a good idea.

i've found a few uploads that put a black box over my watermark and put theirs in it's place. i contacted the owner of the site about it and he said he didn't do it. of course he didn't, why would he ever want to do something like that?

maybe i need to put the watermark right around the gloryhole itself!

gideongallery 02-25-2012 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 18781099)
moving the watermark around from corner to corner sounds like a good idea.

i've found a few uploads that put a black box over my watermark and put theirs in it's place. i contacted the owner of the site about it and he said he didn't do it. of course he didn't, why would he ever want to do something like that?

maybe i need to put the watermark right around the gloryhole itself!

seriously take a course on product placement

specifically on signage placement

if your understanding of that is so limited that this is the best you can think off you really need training.

The Porn Nerd 02-25-2012 01:24 PM

Here's why they remove the watermark:
Videos WITHOUT watermarks get more views. More views = more $$$ for the tubes. Yes people, tubes make WAY more from selling their ad space than they do from any Content Partner Program. The CCP is just there for if/when their surfer leaves the tube site (they might as well try and get some $ out of it).
Deal with it and prosper.
Carry on.

dgraves 02-25-2012 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18781110)
seriously take a course on product placement

specifically on signage placement

if your understanding of that is so limited that this is the best you can think off you really need training.

i know the thought of any kind of signage probably pisses someone like you off because it's making theft harder for you but out of curiosity, what would you recommend?

putting the watermark on the shaft of their cocks is pretty creative!

dgraves 02-25-2012 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18781115)
Here's why they remove the watermark:
Videos WITHOUT watermarks get more views. More views = more $$$ for the tubes. Yes people, tubes make WAY more from selling their ad space than they do from any Content Partner Program. The CCP is just there for if/when their surfer leaves the tube site (they might as well try and get some $ out of it).
Deal with it and prosper.
Carry on.

where did you get this data from?

DWB 02-25-2012 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 18781099)
moving the watermark around from corner to corner sounds like a good idea.

Yep. You can outsmart them. Bottom feeders always take the easy road. Make it more work than it's worth and they'll find another video to remove the watermarks on. And the Filipinos that many tube sites are paying to do this, are generally lazy, so they will skip you without question if you make them actually have to work for something. They just want to batch process everything, and if you foil that, you're 10 steps ahead.

porno jew 02-25-2012 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18781023)
so explain it then

why do the end users remove the watermark.

explained in this thread, kook.

papill0n 02-25-2012 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery (Post 18781063)
difference is that since fair use existed, a watermark is NOT proof of infringement.

It was as valid as saying your guilty of theft because the sky is blue.

no you stupid piece of dog shit

the sky doesnt have your name on it

see the difference there idiot ?

dgraves 02-25-2012 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18781124)
Yep. You can outsmart them. Bottom feeders always take the easy road. Make it more work than it's worth and they'll find another video to remove the watermarks on. And the Filipinos that many tube sites are paying to do this, are generally lazy, so they will skip you without question if you make them actually have to work for something. They just want to batch process everything, and if you foil that, you're 10 steps ahead.

thanks for the tips earlier man.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc