GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Google's update, Galleries, and rel="nofollow"?? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1066404)

Naughty-Pages 04-28-2012 03:55 PM

Google's update, Galleries, and rel="nofollow"??
 
Do you think that if you have a ton of galleries linked with rel="nofollow" that Google's latest updates now treat your whole gallery pages as one big pile of advertisements??

Just curious to hear from others who have a bunch of sites and use rel="nofollow" for fhg's on some sites and then do not use it on others.



The other messed up thing is on some sites I was ranked #1 for, I am now on page 5, and 90% of what is above me is illegal tubes with pirated content.. and Also Scraped content..

Some asshat stole a bunch of the titles verbatim including the name of my domain names from my sites and put it on pages of his own sites, and now outranks my own sites.. lmfao!

sandman! 04-28-2012 04:02 PM

i always thought of no follow as something google can track to see who is spending more time on seo then building quality sites :2 cents::2 cents:

Naughty-Pages 04-28-2012 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman! (Post 18914394)
i always thought of no follow as something google can track to see who is spending more time on seo then building quality sites :2 cents::2 cents:

Ya.. that was sort of what I was thinking :(

part of their over-optimization algo (combined with looking like one big advertisement)

u-Bob 04-28-2012 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman! (Post 18914394)
i always thought of no follow as something google can track to see who is spending more time on seo then building quality sites :2 cents::2 cents:

Exactly. There's no reason to use "no follow" in places other than user submitted comment areas. I always laughed when peopled used "no follow" to 'sculpt' their internal link structure.

baryl 04-28-2012 04:40 PM

Well if your site is full of nothing but links to sponsor galleries then it is a page full of ads.

RyuLion 04-28-2012 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baryl (Post 18914442)
Well if your site is full of nothing but links to sponsor galleries then it is a page full of ads.

:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

VenusBlogger 04-28-2012 04:59 PM

nofollow never made sense...

it's a waste of time and it will only hurt your site to give it a NO NATURAL look...

stevemib 04-28-2012 05:03 PM

From what I have read is Google looks at everything above the fold. If there are too many ads and little content then it will hurt rankings. They have a full tutorial on google webmaster about the new Panda update.:2 cents:

PXN 04-28-2012 05:07 PM

Don't think it make that much of a difference. But if you have too many like using it for links for hundreds of galleries it can make your whole webpage look long and bulky to google.

baryl 04-28-2012 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VenusBlogger (Post 18914458)
nofollow never made sense...

it's a waste of time and it will only hurt your site to give it a NO NATURAL look...

What is a "natural" look? Slopped together and unprofessional?

I don't think nofollow in itself is bad but abusing it, especially on internal links, is bad. If a site is nothing but ads or gallery links it's going to get punished with out without nofollow.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123