GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   New Direction for SEO (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1069687)

drrkness 05-29-2012 09:39 AM

New Direction for SEO
 
With all the tube sites doing so well in the search engines are newer sites like http://randylist.com filling a need with proper SEO and interlinks? Are we going to see more and more sites that just jump off to others with gaming the search engine traffic?

2intense 05-29-2012 09:52 AM

huh?????

Tom_PM 05-29-2012 09:54 AM

It's just giving link backs to existing tubes adding to the tubes rank, or am I missing something?

pornguy 05-29-2012 10:07 AM

Tom. This is very simple. Behind closed doors and on a secret floor deals have been made with google by the tubes. They have paid big to have the panda update and they dont need back links any more.

The murder on that floor just after the meeting was never investigated and the Government stopped the news from talking about it.

You really need to try and keep up.

Rochard 05-29-2012 10:11 AM

I'm trying something new with SEO - not trying too hard. No back links, no trading links, just raw hand written text.

Tom_PM 05-29-2012 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 18970447)
Tom. This is very simple. Behind closed doors and on a secret floor deals have been made with google by the tubes. They have paid big to have the panda update and they dont need back links any more.

The murder on that floor just after the meeting was never investigated and the Government stopped the news from talking about it.

You really need to try and keep up.

I'm out of teh loops!

xxxjay 05-29-2012 10:19 AM

Nothing to see here

drrkness 05-29-2012 10:21 AM

Interesting angle on it. Maybe a little paranoid, but still. That site I posted is like a tube site... just a little tweaked with back links.

pornguy 05-29-2012 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18970453)
I'm trying something new with SEO - not trying too hard. No back links, no trading links, just raw hand written text.

Message me I will pass on something to try with this test you are doing.

Fap 05-29-2012 10:42 AM

On a side note.. drrkness can you hit me up for iOS dev?

drrkness 05-29-2012 11:15 AM

I'm on ICQ IM me

drrkness 05-29-2012 12:40 PM

What do any other SEO guys think of this site? Is it going to work or just be another stagnant web service that isn't indexed?

drrkness 06-04-2012 12:08 PM

Any SEO guys here in the forms?

Colmike9 06-04-2012 01:09 PM

Google isn't the only search engine... :2 cents:

mromro 06-04-2012 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18970453)
I'm trying something new with SEO - not trying too hard. No back links, no trading links, just raw hand written text.

How is this working for you? I think I may try this too. As I remember this is the way I was doing it in th begining with two of my sites and then of course I read all this BS about having to get links and I started trading links and my traffic dropped.

bean-aid 06-04-2012 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18970453)
I'm trying something new with SEO - not trying too hard. No back links, no trading links, just raw hand written text.

I think you can place well for the kewords in your title. Just a couple backlinks and a lot of custom text....

....BUT.....

It would be very easy for a competitor to knock you out of SERPS by just buying a few hundred really shitty links into your site with the keyword.

That is my experience with doing very little to a site.

CyberHustler 06-04-2012 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 18970469)
Nothing to see here

:2 cents:

BSleazy 06-04-2012 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18970453)
I'm trying something new with SEO - not trying too hard. No back links, no trading links, just raw hand written text.

If you build it they will come?

drrkness 06-04-2012 02:11 PM

Are back links more important that good basic on page SEO?

KillerK 06-04-2012 02:17 PM

Good back links still are good.

~Ray 06-04-2012 06:28 PM

name of the game.

let me know if you need a boost

VS_Jeff 06-05-2012 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drrkness (Post 18985990)
Are back links more important that good basic on page SEO?

Not with the new Panda update. Content is king IMO.

drrkness 06-05-2012 02:37 PM

Good ol' fashion HTML tags. Google should just put the rules online and let us do our work!!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123