Lots of TUBES don't have self-hosted movies..
 

yet, they rank well in google.

I don't know why many guys here keep saying that TUBES rank well in google, because they have movies and make the user stay longer on the site.

BULL-SHIT.

Just check most ADULT tubes right now in 2012, they put just screenshots like in OLD TGPs and SEND THE TRAFFIC to youporn, xhamster, redtube, etc... YET they still rank well in Google... So, stop saying that TUBES rank well in GOOGLE because they have movies and prevent the user to bounce, and stay longer in site and BLA BLA BLA, PURE BULLSHIT that you all made up to the point that you started to believe it.

yeah yeah, lets see who's the first gay CAM SPAMMER to REPLY with a caption pic. TOO OBVIOUS. Try something else. I SAID IT...

PIRIOD.

Cams make me bank!

PIRIOD

Tubes rank well IN PART due to time on site / bounce rate. ;)

Scammer!

PERIOD!
http://edge.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFil...8/80611496.jpg

Wow, you are right. Tube sites aren't ranking high on google!

xhamster and a few rank high.

not all tubes do.

but the main ones do. and once people log on to them they will keep going back.

I'd suck that dry :thumbsup

Most of the tubes that hold the strong serps host the content.

A lot of those tubes not hosting the content have the video links open in a new page so usually the visitor keeps the tube site open.

and alot of them embed vids. The high ranking pages do. So yea they are still on their site while playing. Your posts are idiotic by the way, and the lame 'PIRIOD' only adds to the stupidity.

How's that any different from skim TGPs? ;)

What's your point with this rant? That some people can manipulate the search engines and that's new or that tubes don't rank high? Cause last time I looked, top traffic owners were tubes.

Just for argument's sake, tubes having most of the traffic isn't necessarily a result of them ranking the highest in the search engines. :)

Syndicate and feed through longtails