2002 video of Romney.. You just can't make this stuff up..
 

Seriously, at this point if you say you are voting for Romney because of policy or taxes you are full of shit or a fucking idiot. :1orglaugh

The ONLY motivation anyone could legitimately have to vote for Romney is they Love Mormons, Hate Black Guys and because he's not Democrat.

The guy just doesn't give a fuck what he says because he knows the average person voting for him fall into the three categories Or they have a brain the size of a goldfish.. I mean really, how much more of this stuff would any sensible person need to see, before they come to the conclusion they guy is full of shit?

:1orglaugh

Or, they realize the Obama = fail as a president.

Or you could look into the other parties out there. There are more then two parties people! If you don't like Mittens or Obama then check out the rest of the candidates running.

So they vote for someone that will increase spending and out right lie about everything? LOL sound like a smart idea.

He's a despicable piece of shit. His hypocrisy is breathtakingly brazen. His supporters are low information voters...or just assholes.

http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/wp-...-hypocrite.jpg

Obama 2012.

To be a good politician you have to first be a good liar. They all say the same shit when you want to hear it and then go back on thier word when they are elected.

So many politicians are caught out lying and stealing money yet we all still vote for these assholes

If not being a slave makes me you I will very happily stay a slave.

agreed...

Trouble is you have to have government otherwise you would have anarchy

In my opinion. Having a president for 4 years is insane. How can someone accomplish anything in 4 years in this day and age, with this economy, in this country. The truth is, all of these guys are full of shit. They are politicians. To say one is better then the other is insane. People say Obama is so bad, the economy, blah blah. In the meanwhile. The stock market is the highest it has ever been. So companies are making money... people are making money. Blame the economy, blame the president, but most importantly, blame yourself. The US people are the ones who signed off on mortgages they couldn't afford, they bought cars they couldn't afford, they refinanced houses to buy luxury items. The companies who got paid for idiots to do this deserve every dollar they made. If you are dumb enough to do things like this. You deserve bad credit, you deserve to have your house taken away so on so forth. Go out, get an education, get trained with a skill, do fucking something. This country is filled with losers who think things should be given to them, when politicians know that in order to get something, you have to go out and take it. If you don't think like this. You are a loser. You will never be rich, you will always suck. No matter who is in office. They are all completely full of shit, and they all lie, and no one is changes the unemployment rate by large margins at this point. Its not going back to 6%. There are now to many stupid people in this country. Wake the fuck up!

Dont be a loser. And until you own a business that does 500+ million in business a year. Then you dont have to worry. Because whatever happens, happens.

Vote SUPZ in November.

While China's economy continues to grow ours in the western world shrinks

The problem with voting for a 3rd party is it's pretty much useless because he would never get the electoral votes. As long as the electoral college decide who will be president then it's a waste of time having a third party.

If the election were decided by the popular vote, then a 3rd party could potentially have a chance. Until then it's pretty much just a bunch of pissing in the wind.

That is what he wants.

You overestimate their popularity. :2 cents:

I wasn't meaning because of their popularity. I was meaning the electoral college is a scam in it's self and the Republicans & Democrats have it completely wrapped up. A 3rd party even if they won the popular vote would still never get the electoral votes unless it was such a land slide on the popular vote that they absolutely had to give them to him.

There is a lot of truth in what you just said. The true impact of a sitting president isn't felt until three - five years after his term. Right now we are still feeling the massive impact of the of Bush's term, who wrote bills into law and failed to fund them - leaving it to the "next guy".

I'm not saying this to bash Romeny. Obama did it with Obamacare - a lot of the law hasn't even taken affect yet. A lot of it hasn't been paid for yet. We'll cover that bridge in the next election.

Yes, I did vote for Obama and that's exactly what he did. :(

Not this time.

Don't you realize that when you use that kind of verbiage full of hate and venom that it HURTS your candidate?

Newsflash: Obama would have nothing to do with a person like you who says the things you do. He would have nothing but disdain for you. As he should.

I did not vote for the president 4 years ago but this Obama bashing is ridiculous and borderline unpatriotic.

Some of the things this man try to push through, like the jobs bill would have helped but the republican controlled congress wouldn't pass it. They filibustered almost everything he tried passing to the detriment of the American people. They didn't even pass a farm bill. Just petty stuff like not passing the benefits raise for veterans which was already agreed upon, they decided to go on vacation and pass it when they come back.

It's truly ridiculous what they have done, not saying Obama has been the best president ever but how about holding congress accountable for trying to undermine the President while hurting Americans for political purposes.

If Obama had Romney's track record people would go crazy. Would you vote for Obama if he had Romney's record?

If you were in Congress and you saw something called a "Jobs Bill" but when you looked at it you determined it was a bad bill and wouldn't help at all...would you vote for it?

Also, keep in mind that the Republican House has sent several "jobs bills" to the Democrat Senate. Harry Reid has refused to even allow a vote on them. Isn't that "unpatriotic" too via your definition?

I'm pretty sure that the founding fathers deliberately made it difficult to pass new laws and legislation. They never wanted or intended for one party (in this case the Democrats) to be able to rule like Kings.
The Republicans are doing exactly what they are supposed to be doing.

They were voted in to oppose the Democrats plan by the people. If the people don't like it then they should have voted Democrat. Right?

It's election time now. So we'll see if people have changed their minds from 2 years ago and want to give the Democrats more power.

And yes, Obama is an utter failure.
He is the first president I've seen who has been incapable of reaching out to the opposing party and getting a compromise.

Reagan did it with a hostile Democrat House and Senate. Clinton did it with a hostile Republican House and Senate. Even Bush got the Dems to vote with him on his bills.

Obama is the first I've seen to fail so hard and make so many excuses.

$410 million for the Olympics is nothing, Vancouver cost $925!

But then again if John Furlong (Vancouver Olympics CEO) tried to run for Prime Minister and use the Olympics as an example of his business credentials he would get laughed at pretty fucking hard

Romney, Morals. That was sarcastic right? I am not saying I care if my president has morals or not. I am just making sure...

Believe me, most of the people who voice there opinion the loudest have the least political knowledge. Not much of an education and have minimal knowledge of real economics, politics and how things really work. They just run with the crowd. The crowd says Obama did bad so he did bad. But they really couldn't tell you why. It is the main reason I deactivate my facebook account during elections years. To see people I know who are high school drop outs and drug addicts talk about the debate like they are aloud to vote after their second felony makes me want to give someone a beating.

Neither Reagan, Clinton or Bush had to deal with the likes of this...

http://images.politico.com/global/ne...tor_ap_605.jpg

The best thing that could be done for the US right now is to put a real business man in office. Neither of the ass hats in place for this election are business men.

That is simply not true. Just because that is more recent, it seems that way.

Reagan had a buzzsaw in Tip O'Neil to deal with. Both Senate and House were Democrat and had been for decades. Tip O'Neil was the most powerful man in Washington.
The media and the left were merciless on Reagan. He was a befuddled old man who didn't know anything and didn't actually run things in their view. It was attack after attack.
But guess what? Reagan was a LEADER and he reached out and got things done.

As for Clinton...come on get serious. That's recent enough for everyone to remember. The Republicans and the right treated him with complete disrespect and it was shameful. They IMPEACHED him for God's sake! And he had to deal with a guy by the name of Newt Gingrich who was the most powerful man in Washington and the guy who was behind the "Contract For America" that changed the House over to Republicans for the first time in modern history.
The entire country it seemed hated Clinton in 1994.
BUT...Clinton was a LEADER. And by 1995 he had stopped trying to push through "Hillary Care" and had turned around and reached out to Newt Gingrich and the Republicans. And guess what? They got things done and the country prospered.

Obama on the other hand, got a big wake up call in 2012 when the country voted the Dems out of the House and the Repubs gained a lot in the Senate.
But unlike Clinton, he decided to "double down" and he has never had the skill and finesse to reach out to the Republicans and get things done.

Excuses are good and all...but the facts are that he simply isn't a leader. Maybe he'll do better in the second term? Who knows. Or maybe he'll continue on the path he's been on and we'll be screwed even worse. I guess we'll find out. :(

two party system, thats supposed to be a representative democracy?
got to be kidding me. I wonder how many Americans truly feel represented.
wake up and have a look at European parliaments, often with 5-10 different political parties and alliances across 3-4 of them to form government.

i am tired of:
Presidents campaigning while on duty.
If there was no need to raise so much money then it would reduce the amount of "work time" it take to "run for office", get back to work buddy..
Candidates taking any funds for campaigning from anyone. No more hands in the pocket of the candidates. Give them x amount of $ to use and be done with it.
Take the money out of politics.