crockett |
10-22-2012 07:54 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless
(Post 19268060)
Nobody is voting for Mitt on foreign policy grounds. Anyone making a decision based on foreign policy would choose Obama.
That's why this debate was pointless.
Obama couldn't lose a voter over these questions and Romney couldn't gain one.
Romney's entire foreign policy point of view boils down to 'I'd do everything Obama is doing, but i'd do it with a more arrogant tone.'
|
I don't think that's true.. You have to hear what their foreign policy point of view is. Don't forget that Obama had next to no foreign policy experience in govt when he first campaigned for the presidency.
I can tell you straight up that it was what he said on foreign policy, which is why I voted for him 4 years ago. He promised to get us out of Iraq & refocus the war on terror and he promised to hunt bin laden where ever he went. He did.
That was the main issues that I felt needed to be resolved this last 4 years before he was elected. The economy was just starting to show it's problems out in the open at that point so it wasn't a major deal to me then.
Personally, I feel I got what I voted for with Obama as he did what I was concerned with him doing. This time around it's more about the economy and in all honestly I do not believe a Republican at this point has the best interest in mind for this country.
I do think Obama has made a few mistakes with the economy, but in all honestly much of the blame can be rested right back at the Republicans in the House, that refuse to work with democrats on any issues for the good of the country but instead keep going against anything that isn't some political win for the GOP.
|