GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   1980 Called and want's it's foreign policy back. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1086389)

blackmonsters 10-22-2012 06:14 PM

1980 Called and want's it's foreign policy back.
 
One zinger for Obama.

:1orglaugh

https://youtube.com/politics?feature=inp-lt-ype-109

tony286 10-22-2012 06:47 PM

I like we also have less horses and bayonets. Lol

epitome 10-22-2012 06:49 PM

Obama just sunk Mitts battleship.

blackmonsters 10-22-2012 07:24 PM

Romney looks like he needs to take a shit.

:1orglaugh

crockett 10-22-2012 07:32 PM

Man Obama should have asked Mitt why he didn't meet with the workers from Sensata.

He missed a Golden opportunity to hit him hard when Mitt said he knows what the unemployed want because he's met with them..

epitome 10-22-2012 07:35 PM

In a few days Romney is going to give an interview where he will probably say he wanted to punch him.

epitome 10-22-2012 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19268049)
Man Obama should have asked Mitt why he didn't meet with the workers from Sensata.

He missed a Golden opportunity to hit him hard when Mitt said he knows what the unemployed want because he's met with them..

The parties have a 23 page memorandum of understanding about the debates. That was probably on Romney's list of do not address.

Relentless 10-22-2012 07:39 PM

Nobody is voting for Mitt on foreign policy grounds. Anyone making a decision based on foreign policy would choose Obama.
That's why this debate was pointless.
Obama couldn't lose a voter over these questions and Romney couldn't gain one.
Romney's entire foreign policy point of view boils down to 'I'd do everything Obama is doing, but i'd do it with a more arrogant tone.'

Relentless 10-22-2012 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19268057)
The parties have a 23 page memorandum of understanding about the debates. That was probably on Romney's list of do not address.

The league of women voters stopped sanctioning debates in the 90s because they did not want to be part of a plan to defraud the American public.

2012 10-22-2012 07:42 PM

:1orglaugh

crockett 10-22-2012 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19268060)
Nobody is voting for Mitt on foreign policy grounds. Anyone making a decision based on foreign policy would choose Obama.
That's why this debate was pointless.
Obama couldn't lose a voter over these questions and Romney couldn't gain one.
Romney's entire foreign policy point of view boils down to 'I'd do everything Obama is doing, but i'd do it with a more arrogant tone.'

I don't think that's true.. You have to hear what their foreign policy point of view is. Don't forget that Obama had next to no foreign policy experience in govt when he first campaigned for the presidency.

I can tell you straight up that it was what he said on foreign policy, which is why I voted for him 4 years ago. He promised to get us out of Iraq & refocus the war on terror and he promised to hunt bin laden where ever he went. He did.

That was the main issues that I felt needed to be resolved this last 4 years before he was elected. The economy was just starting to show it's problems out in the open at that point so it wasn't a major deal to me then.

Personally, I feel I got what I voted for with Obama as he did what I was concerned with him doing. This time around it's more about the economy and in all honestly I do not believe a Republican at this point has the best interest in mind for this country.

I do think Obama has made a few mistakes with the economy, but in all honestly much of the blame can be rested right back at the Republicans in the House, that refuse to work with democrats on any issues for the good of the country but instead keep going against anything that isn't some political win for the GOP.

blackmonsters 10-22-2012 07:58 PM

Obama : "We've visited your website many times and it still doesn't work".

At the very end of this clip in which he destroys Romney like a sword to the throat.

http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t2#...battleship.cnn

:1orglaugh

bronco67 10-22-2012 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 19268079)

This time around it's more about the economy and in all honestly I do not believe a Republican at this point has the best interest in mind for this country.

Most Republicans(especially Romney) have in their mind the interests of whoever's pocket they happen to be living in at that moment. For Romney, it's the Koch brothers and quite a few other richer than god asshole types.

keysync 10-22-2012 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19268125)
Most Republicans(especially Romney) have in their mind the interests of whoever's pocket they happen to be living in at that moment. For Romney, it's the Koch brothers and quite a few other richer than god asshole types.

That goes both ways.
Let me show you.

Most Democrats(especially Obama) have in their mind the interests of whoever's pocket they happen to be living in at that moment. For Obama, it's the Koch brothers and quite a few other richer than god asshole types.

bronco67 10-22-2012 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keysync (Post 19268135)
That goes both ways.
Let me show you.

Most Democrats(especially Obama) have in their mind the interests of whoever's pocket they happen to be living in at that moment. For Obama, it's the Koch brothers and quite a few other richer than god asshole types.

But what I said was true, because the Koch brothers are trying to buy the election for Romney. How does playing with my statement make it work for your argument? It doesn't, since the Koch brothers aren't giving Obama's campaign any money. So, I dare you to make less sense.

keysync 10-22-2012 08:53 PM

forgot to edit out Koch brothers and put in Soros or some other Billionaire Dem supporter.
Then it would be true.
I'm not arguing.
I'm just pointing out that your mad because Romney is doing exactly what Obama is doing.
They're politicians.
They are both puppets for their handlers.

bronco67 10-22-2012 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keysync (Post 19268144)
forgot to edit out Koch brothers and put in Soros or some other Billionaire Dem supporter.
Then it would be true.
I'm not arguing.
I'm just pointing out that your mad because Romney is doing exactly what Obama is doing.
They're politicians.
They are both puppets for their handlers.

ok we can agree on that. But Mitt Romney seems to care less about the country, and more about solidifying his legacy as having his turn at being "Mr President".

keysync 10-22-2012 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19268151)
ok we can agree on that. But Mitt Romney seems to care less about the country, and more about solidifying his legacy as having his turn at being "Mr President".

I think he comes off that way because he's a corporate guy.
Not a community organizer.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc