GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The Illuminati are at it again ...CNBC Exec?s Children Murdered (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1087307)

JFK 10-30-2012 01:51 AM
The Illuminati are at it again ...CNBC Exec?s Children Murdered
 
1 Day After CNBC Reports $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit

read all about it, before this gets taken down as well:2 cents:

http://theintelhub.com/2012/10/27/cn...kster-lawsuit/

Phoenix 10-30-2012 03:22 AM
oh crap here comes franck

georgeyw 10-30-2012 03:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFK (Post 19281897)
1 Day After CNBC Reports $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit

read all about it, before this gets taken down as well:2 cents:

http://theintelhub.com/2012/10/27/cn...kster-lawsuit/
Whatever the reason, it was really sad to read that the other day. Two young kids stabbed to death for no reason :disgust

RyuLion 10-30-2012 03:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFK (Post 19281897)
1 Day After CNBC Reports $43 Trillion Bankster Lawsuit

read all about it, before this gets taken down as well:2 cents:

http://theintelhub.com/2012/10/27/cn...kster-lawsuit/
:helpme:helpme:helpme

PR_Glen 10-30-2012 06:13 AM
ok, why the vice president and not the president? why not any ceo's? the producer? the one who reported it? plus theres easier ways to do such things without it seeming so obvious.

we gotta add you to the kook list too there jfk?

halfpint 10-30-2012 06:21 AM
Wow that is bat shit crazy

wehateporn 10-30-2012 06:22 AM
This will send out a message to all in the MSM; One does not fock with The Global Mafia and get away with it

MontrealDave 10-30-2012 06:31 AM
I was wondering why they never mentioned the father in this awful double murder. Nevertheless, I find it hard to believe that some hidden group would make a nanny depressed over a period of months (according to the nanny's family) in order to drive her to murder the children she was caring for. :2 cents:

wehateporn 10-30-2012 06:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MontrealDave (Post 19282174)
I was wondering why they never mentioned the father in this awful double murder. Nevertheless, I find it hard to believe that some hidden group would make a nanny depressed over a period of months (according to the nanny's family) in order to drive her to murder the children she was caring for. :2 cents:
One would murder the nanny first, make it look like a suicide, and then murder the children, setting it up as if she killed them.

This dark art is used a lot by the secret services :2 cents:

Brujah 10-30-2012 06:42 AM
It's funny how crazy people are never just crazy anymore, and violent people are never just violent anymore. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.

Barry-xlovecam 10-30-2012 07:21 AM
I had a look at the screen caps that were linked from that article -- the story claims a lawsuit filed in the US District Court in Brooklyn NY with a case number. If you have ever filed documents to a court case you know you receive a copy of them stamped by the Court's Clerk. So, even if the filing with the Court "mysteriously" disappears the original stamped copy may still be out there to resurface.

***http://www.scribd.com/doc/111307429/...nt-in-New-York it is published here but not the original one of course

Or, it's a whopper of a tale from the "blogosphere." Without any supporting evidence -- that is all it is ...

Brujah 10-30-2012 07:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 19282264)
I had a look at the screen caps that were linked from that article -- the story claims a lawsuit filed in the US District Court in Brooklyn NY with a case number. If you have ever filed documents to a court case you know you receive a copy of them stamped by the Court's Clerk. So, even if the filing with the Court "mysteriously" disappears the original stamped copy may still be out there to resurface.

Or, it's a whopper of a tale from the "blogosphere." Without any supporting evidence -- that is all it is ...
These bizarre unrelated connections are made all the time by these types. Better questions should be asked like, did CNBC break the news? Were they the only ones? Why make this connection at all about a non-secret, ie. something as public as a US District Court filing.

Spire Law Group sent out the Press Release themselves on October 25th, and it was picked up by a lot of people as a result if you do some searching.
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-relea...175828861.html

Barry-xlovecam 10-30-2012 07:40 AM
I downloaded the document ...

It is 900+ pages long LOL -- must read like a novel.

Quote:
No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML
[Assigned to: Senior Judge
Jack B. Weinstein]
[Referred to: Magistrate Judge
Robert M. Levy]
VERIFIED FIRST
AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR
DAMAGES AND
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
[JURY TRIAL
DEMANDED]
The Magistrate can read it -- be a while ... :1orglaugh

Barry-xlovecam 10-30-2012 08:08 AM
Gets better :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

It is the press release, a complaint ( a flowery one )
Quote:
[t]he Defendants have actually and in fact engaged in the raping, pillaging and plundering of $43 Trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) as well as other personalty including clothing, automobiles, valuable jewelry, gold, silver, precious metals and all forms of valuable personal property known to man, ... (Spire Law v. The Illuminati 2012 Pp.20)
and the Senate report:

United States Senate
PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Carl Levin, Chairman
Tom Coburn, Ranking Minority Member
RELEASED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS
JULY 17, 2012 HEARING

that is the other 400 pages.

When is the date of the court hearing? Well good luck ...

JFK 10-30-2012 08:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19282149)
ok, why the vice president and not the president? why not any ceo's? the producer? the one who reported it? plus theres easier ways to do such things without it seeming so obvious.

we gotta add you to the kook list too there jfk?
If you must, or just read the article and perhaps form your own opinion:2 cents:

xNetworx 10-30-2012 08:32 PM
Very strange how the article vanished from CNBC. Very strange.

2012 10-30-2012 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 19282191)
It's funny how crazy people are never just crazy anymore, and violent people are never just violent anymore. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.
such a sad... sad world isn't it :Oh crap
http://i.imgur.com/eWZiG.jpg

Killswitch 10-30-2012 09:30 PM
Lol... Illuminati... Lol

Dirty F 10-30-2012 09:34 PM
So jfk turned into a conspiracy nut as well? Am i reading this right?

jigg 10-30-2012 11:00 PM
doesn't make sense.

Why would CNBC report the story against whoever's wishes, then whoever it was kill this execs kids - basically everything that matters to him - so now he has nothing to lose. Assuming he's not afraid of dying

imabro 10-30-2012 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19283908)
So jfk turned into a conspiracy nut as well? Am i reading this right?
adapt or dye

BIGTYMER 10-30-2012 11:14 PM
CNBC didn't report it. CNBC just reposted the story just like many news sites do.

It was also on the CNBC site for 48 hours before it was removed.

Matt 26z 10-30-2012 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamBoss (Post 19283843)
Very strange how the article vanished from CNBC. Very strange.
MarketWatch.com (Wall Street Journal) pulled their story shortly after CNBC.com pulled theirs.

Brujah 10-31-2012 07:23 AM
Maybe the story was pulled for other reasons, like it has no merit? It was frivolous? It was based on an amateur press release? It was inaccurate? It isn't newsworthy?

Maybe they realized it was like reposting a story by JohnnyClips (or JFK in this case) as being true, and upon realizing their embarrassing error, removed it.

baddog 10-31-2012 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 19284581)
Maybe the story was pulled for other reasons, like it has no merit? It was frivolous? It was based on an amateur press release? It was inaccurate? It isn't newsworthy?

Maybe they realized it was like reposting a story by JohnnyClips (or JFK in this case) as being true, and upon realizing their embarrassing error, removed it.
Am surprised it took that long. Someone posted it on FB yesterday and it took about two minutes to figure out it was another JohnnyClips on the loose.

Sly 10-31-2012 10:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 19284581)
Maybe the story was pulled for other reasons, like it has no merit? It was frivolous? It was based on an amateur press release? It was inaccurate? It isn't newsworthy?

.
You just don't get it.

This is what they want you to believe. Please man, open your eyes. Wake up!

BIGTYMER 10-31-2012 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19284894)
You just don't get it.

This is what they want you to believe. Please man, open your eyes. Wake up!
:2 cents: :2 cents:

Lizard people are among us.

DTK 10-31-2012 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFK (Post 19282448)
If you must, or just read the article and perhaps form your own opinion:2 cents:
PR_Glen's opinion is whatever Big Daddy tells him it is.

Dirty F 10-31-2012 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTK (Post 19285135)
PR_Glen's opinion is whatever Big Daddy tells him it is.
:1orglaugh

Fuck, you truthers are sad.

DTK 10-31-2012 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19284894)
You just don't get it.

This is what they want you to believe. Please man, open your eyes. Wake up!
Don't know if you were being sarcastic, but i do agree.

DTK 10-31-2012 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 19284042)
MarketWatch.com (Wall Street Journal) pulled their story shortly after CNBC.com pulled theirs.
They've re-published it: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/maj...ury-2012-10-25

2012 10-31-2012 02:06 PM
cheers

http://i.imgur.com/kWP7b.jpg

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE 10-31-2012 02:10 PM
amulet wearers


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc