Google Disavow Tool? Black Hat SEO/negative SEO affecting your SERP
 

:mad:
I've been recently the victim of Google Penguin's update in october and will post further details as soon as I receive the answer of some US based Host. Did anyone notice a surge in Toxic Backlinks on your domains recently as a side effect of Google's penguin update?

As I fould in this recent article below about Negative SEO:
http://tweakyourbiz.com/marketing/20...ltimate-guide/

Have any of you used Google's Disavow Tool? How would you get rid of toxic backlinks?

You can't.

:2 cents:

I wouldn't be so sure. You can still contact the webmaster and/or his host. For example in my case the backlinks are on several domains hosted with FDCservers.net. Here's my email communications with FDCservers so far:

Here's their response:

First of all, you have no idea what back links you have. Google only shows tiny%. I can fire up Xrumer and blast you with 1,000,000 links in the next 2 days and you will never see them or know about them but you will be punished almost immediately for the phrases I hit you for. Google after a few weeks or more, might show you 1000 or so of those links if you are lucky and you'll be frantic about it, not realizing they are totally irrelevant to whats going on in the big picture.

Lifes not fair. Learn, adapt and march forward, not backward. Build slow, build big,... link slow. Get over it.

I buy 5 dollar gigs to xrumer the shit out of my competition.

Maybe i fucked up your site as well, who knows.

Well, technically, you can fuck up peoples sites without touching them. Pages strength is determined by the volume and weight of inbound links. As such, all pages are connected and linked indirectly to all others. When one is affected, all are affected (albeit in most cases, unnoticeable). When a page is doing well because it has a few good links front strong sites and strong sites tank because their own inbound links were devalued or they suffered some other penalty, the pages that page links to are affected as their outbound links now carry less weight.

This is what retards never understand about updates. Its not always about "what did i do wrong" - you might see a big drop in the SERPs because of the new absence or devaluation of the links that put you there to begin with. Then people frantically start changing their own sites causing more damage (hoes.com, jays-xxx-links et al - many great examples of this - where powerhouse sites spun out into a series of panic moves that hastened their downfall)

http://www.matthewwoodward.co.uk/tip...-news-for-seo/

If you think you're the "victim of some Google update", move on and build more sites. Don't waste you time using some Google Disavow Tool. Work for yourself, not for Google.

Really psycho?

What "tool" collects trillions of pages, analyzing their linking relationships between them all and gives you a nice report - requiring the computing power of a mid sized country?

Oh, none?

You have no clue what you are even talking about. Yahoo for years was the only ones that made the most of this info available and it wasn't very much. All tools worked off their data.

I never said that and I always say the exact opposite, clown.

:thumbsup:thumbsup

The Google Disavow Tool is a honey-trap. It's a trap designed to catch SEO-n00bs.

yep, 2nd that

Because you pulled facts out of your ass that are totally untrue. "Tools" exist. Obviously.

The only tool that can be accurate is a tool that indexes and analyzes every single page online and their linking relationships. No search engine makes that data available. Yahoo made "some" available. Google makes almost none available.

To my point, you can't possibly know more than a fraction of what sites are linking to your pages, unless you have very few inbound links that are very strong.

Again, you've made that up. PageRank is Google. Google is PageRank. Obviously it goes beyond the initial formula for link/page valuation... but PR matters.

Btw... "Jew" is hardly an insult.

Would you like to compare the average Jews education, income and accomplishment to that of the average tard in New Orleans/Louisiana? I think that would be pretty embarrassing for you.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

1) You apparently have no clue what narcissism means. Which is not surprising as we would expect nothing less of someone from the Bayou.

You guys are so inbred and uneducated, you have reality shows about state residents that require subtitles.

Your states most famous tourist attraction is an area of New Orleans that smells like piss, vomit and dead bodies.

New Orleans residents that fled to Houston from Hurricane Katrina were so ghetto, they caused a massive, city-wide devaluation in rentals and apartment buildings in a city thats already a shithole. Quite a feat!

Go you!

2) You made the claim that one can find all the links etc to a page with "tools available" to challenge what I said. Yet you can't back it up. Not sure what I'm supposed to be proving to you.

We all know what tools are available.

What you apparently have no clue about is how they work and where they draw their data from. Amusing that it never occurred to you to ask yourself how a "tool" is somehow crawling trillions of pages and analyzing linking relationships between them all in real time.

But then again, you believe the attack on the Pentagon was an impromptu attack to simply hide some book keeping errors... so, little surprises me when it comes to things you say.

3) - I said "TOOLBAR PR" is meaningless and there was context to that remark. Toolbar PR is not a real reflection of a pages actual PR as its only updated a few times a year. A PR4 page could actually be a PR1 page that's not going to show as PR1 until the next toolbar PR update.

PR or "PageRank" is the core algorithm of Google and all search engines rely on some similar formula of quantifying the value of a page based on the value of the links linking to it. Not the same as ToolBar PR, dipshit. I think the distinction between the two was also pretty clear in my quote which you dug up in an ironic attempt to sound smart, but which, to no ones surprise again highlights your own stupidity.


You're a retarded lunatic.

Right... you're not from Louisiana. If you live there, you're "from there". No one said you were born there. You're just a retired racist that settled in one of the shittiest and cheapest states in the US where the population is predominantly black or inbred for "the fishing" as if you can't fish anywhere else. I'm guessing fish must be dumber there, giving you a fighting chance.

Lets review.

I state a fact, that you cannot know all the links linking to a page (with respect to the disavow tool in Google) and that Google doesn't even show but a tiny number of inbound links to a page. Therefore, its a pointless thing to worry about and I gave an example as to why... i.e. I can flood you with 1,000,000 backlinks in two days and you won't know where they are from or that it even happened (unless you catch it in Google Search) but your page will suffer almost instantly for the phrases I hit it for.

You challenge me by saying there are tools that show links (a remark, anyone familiar with the topic, filed right away under "no shit - dumbass")

You then talk in circles as you've realized you're wrong that that no tool provides comprehensive data like that in real time. historically, all tools pulled their data from Yahoo and their API. Yahoo only indexes a fraction of that which Google does and their reports/data is sparse. But... you didn't know that because you're a genius?

You then get racial (weird!)- making yourself look like even more of a mad man.

I'm not Jewish
I'm not Russian
You are definitely a lunatic
:2 cents:

You are quite comical. So angry. I'm not Russian. I'm not Jewish. Understanding now that you're "retired", I can understand that a lifetime of being you had to be frustrating. So you get a pass from me on your venom and anger.

Its amusing that your "go to" position is always that the other person is imploding or upset. I assure you, that this entertainment is far from upsetting. In fact, you've said nothing of substance, yet attack me about something I am far more familiar and experienced with than you and I lay my arguments out to be criticized, which you are wholly incapable of doing.

I said "Toolbar PR" not "PR" and explained why (which you can't contest). Toolbar PR and PR (PageRank) are two different things. Neither of which, you understand anything about it seems.

:1orglaugh

Once again - for the 3rd time, I said "Toolbar PR", not "PR" (they are two different things) and I explained why. Of course you have nothing to add because you know nothing of the subject.

Thanks for playing.
:1orglaugh

Uhmm... no, wrong again. First, you brought up PR, not me. You're right. Totally unrelated to the topic.

For the 4th time (maybe 5th?), I am talking about the quote that you dug up. I said "Toolbar PR" not "PR". They are not the same thing. That is a pretty old post that you took the time to dig up and you think it makes me look dumb only because you don't even understand the topic.

Somewhere in Louisiana right now, there must be a nurse trying to trick you into taking your medication. I feel for her. It has to be hell.

Uhm... ok.

I've got bad news for you. Regardless of what you think about anything, I remain unaffected. Sorry.


For the 6th time? I said "Toolbar PR", not "PR" and I went further to explain why a couple times now, of course you can't say anything other than "i'm a liar" because you know nothing of the topic.

Anyway, this went from mildly amusing to boring. You have nothing to say, nothing to offer and know so little of the topic that you are even incapable of discussing it in any manner.

So do a little chest pounding as you get the last word. Announce a victory of sorts. Good for you. Hopefully, this little gesture can make you a tiny bit less angry for a little while.

The only thing that was proved here is how to kill a thread... :thumbsup