Plugrush.com / TrafficBroker.com- Inside
 

I am curious as to why you both would have a support section on IQ69.COM

It is widely known that IQ69.COM is owned by Kaktuz.

It is also widely known that Kaktuz is heavily involved in piracy.

There is also a significant element of piracy site webmasters active at IQ69.COM.

How much did you pay Kaktuz to have a support section on IQ69.COM

Will you both desist from having any involvement with sites owned by pirate networks ?

http://stopfilelockers.com/wp-conten...roker-iq69.jpg

i like poo-iracy

By the looks of it you're a member of that board as well, considering that its a members only view forum.

You're not very smart are you? TrafficBroker.com is owned by Kaktuz too. Dipshit. :1orglaugh

There is an open version of the forum available at another URL.

As for TrafficBroker.com we were advised that it belongs to another entity now. If that's not the case then we will pool it back in with the Kaktuz piracy ring.

Bullshit, that's not how vBulletin's system works. I am a member of IQ69 and have been for a long time... You can't just view it on another url. It's blocked to non-members. Period.

The whole forum is open and here

http://iq69.h4k.it/

fixed that for you :thumbsup

.

Funny how the board is hacked, then the day after you call out the owner and have a link to the hacked database?

is that.. the pirated site of iq69?

you wouldn't be connected to any.. hacking.. would you?

Did some light digging around and hackings were done by CuraHack and AntiWarez both on Twitter under the same nicks, talking about the hacking.

I wouldn't doubt if AdultKing had something to do with it or is connected to these guys.

:disgust

AdultKing acting like a sheriff with plugrush .. ROFL ... can u show us your badge AdultKing ? :))

Just for sheriff to check the popunders of plugrush come from these sites is these all clean? I don't see Kaktuz's

sunporno.com 12298
No referrer 5510
swapsmut.com 3354
pornoxo.com 2141
ah-me.com 1931
burningcamel.com 1184
heavy-r.com 1143
pornsharia.com 799
camelstyle.net 741
girlsonstickam.com 594
porndaddy.us 494
porn.to 468
fun-vids.org 435
xxxprivates.com 365
homemademoviez.com 334
naughtyteenvids.com 263
hardcoreteengirls.com 262
wild-galls.com 246
hotshame.com 242
teenhardcorevids.com 231
screencity.pl 225
imagenova.com 216
pornyeah.com 214
wetplace.com 211
clips-and-pics.org 198
twilightsex.com 170
kaotic.com 163
cockcheese.com 161
cumonprintedpics.com 161
redgonzo.com 154
iyuterscreens.com 151
nakedonthestreets.com 149
pinkrod.com 148
thenewporn.com 145
hornyfuckedteens.com 144
newestteenporn.com 142
filthyrx.com 133
updatetube.com 128
doujinland.com 127
amateursburg.com 119
muchosucko.com 118
nakedteensfuck.com 117
tubehawk.com 115
imageteam.org 114
picbank.pl 114
wet-vagina.com 113
teenfuckxxx.com 113
qrrro.com 112
eroxia.com 112
imgnip.com 112
6t9u.com 112
niceimage.pl 105
24porn7.com 104
fuck-my-gf.com 103
cwtube.com 101

We had nothing to do with it and learned of it through tweets made by the hackers.

We don't hack sites, we have sufficient legal means to go after pirates without a need to hack sites. The information related to these hacks was in the public domain well before we referenced them.

The question remains for Plugrush to answer however. Why is Plugrush actively providing support on a forum run by commercial pirates ?

You could ask the same question why we are all posting on GFY as it its owners have ads on all sorts of sites

:2 cents: :2 cents: :2 cents: :2 cents: :2 cents: :2 cents:

It's not the same thing.

Plugrush have a dedicated support section on a forum run by a large scale commercial pirate which services other commercial pirates.

There has to come a point where companies take some proper corporate accountability and make a clear decision not to deliberately work with copyright infringers.

If people are getting themselves in a knot about this then just wait until we start on other forms of piracy.

The message here is clear, if you knowingly work with pirates then we're going to take you on.

We didn't pay anything to be on the board, he made that section because he was sick of having threads pop up about Plugrush on other sections, so he decided it would be best to move all of them to our own area.

Like we told you in the other thread you created, we don't have the time to investigate every single publisher that uses our service, as there are tens of thousands of them. If you have a website that you in fact know is stealing content, you can e-mail us and we will look into it right away. We told you this weeks ago. Please feel free to e-mail us abuse at plugrush.com and we will look into it. Maybe you should start calling out other ad-networks as well, because everyone that uses us has more than likely uses other ad-networks. Also, those ad-networks post on IQ69 as well....

I work with PlugRush, who you claim works with pirates... I am also a long time member of IQ69 (Dated back to 2005)...

http://i.imgur.com/ctUSl.jpg

I don't know why, but I suddenly have the urge to buy conditioner. If that was your intent, you succeeded.

:thumbsup:1orglaugh

You are trying to do the impossible with ad companys, how are they supposed to know which sites are infringing on copyright and which ones aint ? Take a look at google ads their ads are on all manor of sites and even they cant keep on eye on who is legit and who is not with all thier $$ and technology

When the ad network gets a copy of a DMCA or takedown notice. Then they know.

Exactly, there are just FAR too many websites/users for decent sized ad-networks to even begin that process...

Why would an ad agency get a copy of a DMCA, unless they were somehow hosting the content? :2 cents:

No shit, if I ran an ad company I'd laugh in the face of the DMCA issuer for assuming that's my responsibility...

I run an ad network, and I get takedown requests. I think that's just smart on the part of the agent - casting as wide a net as possible.

Because usually they are hosting the content, whether it be banners or w/e...It's usually a DMCA about the image (plug/banner).

Yes.

Now, should ad companies supply revenue for OBVIOUS piracy, when made aware of it? No, of course not. Should part of their job be to POLICE their networks? I'd argue that such a requirement would place too great a burden on their operations.

Maybe not legally, but do you want to be a good corporate citizen, and help the legit industry that's helping you?...

Yes and that is what PlugRush said they would do in the other thread, They would investigate sites that were brought to thier attention, so why the need for this thread as well ? and then AdultKing demands all these questions like he is some sort of authority.

The more I see his posts the more I think he is going insane demanding this and that lol

This assclown AdultKing isn't helping anyone, if anything he's harming legit businesses flinging shit at everything and anything he can hoping it sticks.

How would you feel if he called you out saying you work with pirates because a legitimate tgp is owned by a pirate and is sending you traffic? Not happy I assume.

I think AK is pissed that plugrush have a dedicated forum at IQ69. It's not that they don't respond to takedown requests - I know they do.

Sorry AdultKing but GFY has been taking money from companys who have known to be infringing on copyright for a long time and they still do , How many sites do you see livejasmin on which infringe on copyright including forums which have links to filelockers.

Retox, it is time for you to put down the beer muscle and sit quietly by.

When AdultKing started i had huge respect for him. Nowadays it looks like he is getting derailed with personal vendettas combined with catchy 'fox news style' thread titles.
You open the thread and you already know its something that barely makes sense or matters..
Get back to what your good at AK. This is getting a bit out of hand. No offense.

:2 cents: :thumbsup

Yes but that was explained to AdultKing already that they did not make the dedicated forum up themselves, it was done by the owners of the forum.
I dont understand what he is trying to achive by starting this thread apart from ruining any more chances of other adult companys working with him as clients. If I was doing what he is doing I sure as hell would not post this on a forum but rather talk directly to the plugrush owners in private.

With all due respect, you are active on two forums owned by a large scale commercial pirate run with the intent of servicing piracy webmasters.

WJunction.com is owned by Kaktuz and is run with the intent of servicing piracy web masters, most of the sites owned by people on that forum are copyright infringing.

It's not good business to be courting pirates, because that's how you end up with pirates on your network.

I don't expect Plugrush to know about every pirate using their service but you should also take some responsibility and not promote your service on forums that almost exclusively cater to the piracy community.

This is a valid point, if the only purpose of IQ69 is for pirates to network. I don't know enough about it to know if that's the case or not.

Just because Kaktuz owns IQ69 doesn't mean that it's full of pirates... There's TONS of people on that board, and many that you probably wouldn't dare call pirates...

Maybe you should do your homework before you start spouting off at the mouth and calling legitimate businesses out for stuff they don't do. :2 cents:

Agreed. I've *never* seen any talk about IP infrigment on that board. Frankly, it's a pretty good business-only board with hardly any drama.

Then what in the flying monkey fuck is the point of this thread? Jumping Jesus H. Christ on a goddamn pogo stick. I can't believe I fell for this trolling bullshit.

I understand 100% where you are coming from man, I really do. But here's my thoughts on it: We did an advertising trick to where we went in and looked at our Google Analytics and looked at where some of our traffic was coming from, so we went to these places and noticed they were forums, so we joined some of these forums, and helped users with questions, getting our name out there even more, showing that we care and that we want to help. Do you honestly think, that we would join some forum if it was known to haven pirates and people doing illegal things? It ABSOLUTELY would not be worth it. I'm sorry if you think that we are some bad company catering these kinds of webmasters, and if this is in fact what you think, you are 100% wrong.

If you need help with anything else about this topic feel free to contact me personally. Thanks.

Thanks for the candid reply.

I'll reach out to you directly and provide you with as much information as possible on the places we believe are involved with piracy and the reasons why.

We're more than happy to work with you to help you avoid piracy havens.

No problem man, show me anything and everything you got and we'll work together and take care of it.

Thread fail.

what ever

51 poos---