Historic Case to Challenge BBC?s 9/11 Coverage
 

They've got to admit it at some point given how many people around the world now know, but likely it will be long after the so-called 'War on Terror' has ended. :2 cents:

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-se...-coverage.html

"On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.

Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public. This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial."

"Rooke has been charged with a crime for not paying his TV Licence Fee. However, he has lodged a legal challenge to this charge and has now been successful in being granted an appearance in a Magistrate’s court, where he has three hours available to present his evidence to defend himself against the charge. Tony has put together a formidable team to support him in presenting the evidence, including the following two outstanding 9/11 researchers:"

"The evidence about 9/11 that will be presented by the various individuals above has rarely, if ever, been seen in any court of law in the United Kingdom, so this court case represents a unique and valuable opportunity for the 9/11 Truth movement."

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-se...-coverage.html

https://youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh They'd be much better letting him off on this occasion

What the fuck kind of bullshit is this? They are going after the BBC in court because they believe 9/11 was fake? And that they reported it incorrectly?

Not this shit again.

And it ain't going away any time soon, not unless they start throwing people into jail for this...actually, I suspect that's what will happen eventually :2 cents:

i only believe what I'm told. this information doesn't fit the current acceptable pattern of intelligence, therefore I might find it increasingly unacceptable and difficult to fit into society( get laid ) with this version. please reformat your data. thank you

It is painful when the mighty PR_Glen calls one a 'Nut Job' :winkwink:

smart meter shoulda tipped me off :disgust

I think the Magistrates are able to tell him to just pay his fine and shut the fuck up.

And I suspect that's what will happen.......

He wont even see a judge - Not exactly 'historic'.

Tony just wants to make sure his license fee isn't used to fund terrorism, if only more of us cared as much as he does. :2 cents:

How professional of the BBC with their harassment and inappropriate conduct while interviewing Dr. Niels Harrit, Associate Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen.

Throw people in jail for what?

Traitors go to jail :2 cents:

What traitors? You can't even give us a reason, no less tell us who did it.

What I'm saying is that to derail the snowballing Truth movement, they will eventually need to throw the Truthers in jail, or fine them. :2 cents:

This could be interesting, thanks for the share.

5 days to go.

Yup, that's us :(:disgust

or marginalize, ridicule and harass them. just like they did with Jim Garrison among countless others.... kinda like they've been doing. the more things change, ______________________

Francknutters

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Ah yes, Mr. No Official Story Left Behind

the truth will come out in 2101

At the stage when...