![]() |
Raising the Minimum Wage Is Good for Business (But the Corporate Lobby Doesn't Think So)
Great article.
Quote:
http://endofthenet.org/wp-content/up...kills-jobs.jpg |
why would they do that ? they want to tank the country.
|
What a strange and unfulfilled life you must lead. Clearly you don't spend your time making money, which is a shame. A lot of misguided and wasted energy. Probably too afraid you might be viewed as exploiting a pixel or two.
|
it cuts into their bottom line... and i was really surprised to hear him say that because he knows damn well people on welfare still make more than someone making 9$/hour... it's all a ploy to keep the sheep complacent.
|
http://simplefactsplainarguments.blo...less-jobs.html
Minimum Wage Laws Equal Less Jobs With Obama's recent push for an increase in the minimum wage to $9/hour, it's important to look at the consequences of a minimum wage of any (economically relevant) amount. Unfortunately, when one looks at the situation from a logical, supply-and-demand point of view, it becomes obvious that the minimum wage is another example of a law backed by good intentions with unintended, harmful consequences. https://lh3.ggpht.com/-dq8Jjek3fTE/U...mand-Graph.png Notice the word "equilibrium." That's important. Firstly, it's completely dishonest to claim that without the minimum wage, we'd all be starving and forced to live off six pennies a day. If a company posted a job for $0.25/hour, I can almost guarantee that they wouldn't get any applications. Labor is a market, and there's a balance. While workers may have to impress employers with their experience and education and such, employers also have to compete for workers. To attract workers to their business, they might offer competitive pay, good medical benefits, advancement opportunities, a good work environment, etc. In a free market, this balance between available jobs and workers is kept relatively stable. It's when the government involves itself through economic regulations like price (wage) controls that the market gets distorted and one group is put at a disadvantage to another. The problem is that enacting a minimum wage law doesn't suddenly give all the working poor a decent-paying job. Instead, it forces employers to consider many people to be unemployable because their sudden increase in pay may not be justifiable by their production, experience, or education. The increase in pay due to the minimum wage may even make it economically impossible for the business owner to keep that worker's position anyway; what if the job itself just isn't worth $9/hour? This is the exact reason why proponents of the minimum wage don't follow their logic to its necessary conclusion. Why doesn't Mr. Obama, if he cares about the little man so much, increase the minimum wage to $15/hour? Or $25/hour? Because by raising the minimum wage, the government forces people out of their jobs, and their jobs out of the country. It's entirely possible to put the entire workforce out of work just by following the logic of minimum wage proponents. On average, unemployment for young people is 15% higher than it is for adults. Why are young people having difficulty finding jobs today? Because, due to the minimum wage and other regulations, it's too expensive for most companies to risk the time and money necessary to train an inexperienced high school or college graduate who will probably move on to something else within a year or two anyway. Instead, the business is forced to minimize the risk posed by a higher minimum wage by only hiring over-qualified, over-experienced workers for entry-level jobs that used to be worked by teenagers and college grads. This creates a vicious cycle of unemployment for young people that can't get the experience they need to begin their professional careers; this cycle is compounded in a weak economy. I'm sure every college graduate reading this can at least remember a time when they were staring at a posting on Indeed or Careerbuilder and muttering, "so I need experience before I can get experience?" I'm still trying to figure it out myself. Don't let its proponents fool you: they claim that the minimum wage protects the poor and the marginalized of society. The truth is the minimum wage will only create more unemployment and misery for the workers it's supposed to protect. Minimum wage laws, by their very nature, only outlaw jobs that pay less than a totally arbitrary dollar amount while doing nothing to create a more favorable environment for businesses to employ people. So what's the solution? How about "freedom of contract?" Wouldn't it be a novel idea for people to negotiate their own pay, hours, benefits, etc., without involving government force? If someone wants to take a $5/hour job rather than sit around and do nothing, why shouldn't they be able to? Should a willing worker go jobless or be forced on welfare because his or her experience, education, or production may not merit the government-enforced minimum wage? In a free society, the price of one's labor is an issue that should be decided between the worker and his potential employer, not the government." . |
AFTER wwII man working full time on minimum wage was able to support his unworking wife, 4 kids, had a single family house and a car- full middle class lifestyle- all that for a minimum wage 40 hour week. Now the same job lends the same man in a food stamp program below poverty line. If that was up to Republicans, minimum wage would be $0.25 per hour and children would work instead of wasting time in schools! Americans, keep voting for GOP and starve later :thumbsup
|
Quote:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_e3gDaHO8VL...economists.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the GOP is just as bad as the Democrats. They all just want to government to control you. You guys should really pick up at least a basic economics and history lesson prior to just looking up stuff on google and posting about it. .:Oh crap . |
Quote:
Remember that a rising tide lifts all boats - if the minimum is set at 9, many jobs will pay more than that. Minimum wage doesn't effect only those making the minimum. |
My question is what adult is worried about minimum wage? I don't know a single person that is concerned about working for minimum wage except my 17year old daughter who even makes above min wage, granted not much more but she would like .75 a hour raise to $9.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is what corporate fascists do, you know? When you look around and see millions of working people living in poverty, millions without health care, millions desperate...don't suggest for a moment that there's something wrong with the picture. If you do, expect to be patronized. You'll be directed to various charts, and pompous asswipes will go on at length about "equilibrium" or some such shit. And finally you'll be told you don't have the brains to understand how it all works. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_e3gDaHO8VL...economists.jpg |
Quote:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0YTZJpJ8Jp...ican_Jesus.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ph679JBP_W...nimum-Wage.jpg |
please tell me you are not that pompous mike....why do you think most people from other countries immigrate to america? minimum fucking wages....i guess women and children working for pennies a day is fine for you? whatever keeps those nikes on your feet and that little polo guy on your shirt...........
|
Quote:
In and of its self this makes no or little sense. If you hire someone for minimum wage that has more then enough experience and is " Over qualified " he is just as likely to leave as a young person who you spent the time and money training. Your going to have to train the over qualified about as much as the under. At least the under will be doing it the way you want. Makes more sense to bring in the younger one and mold them teach them train them and PAY them to stay. People leave because they get offered a better position. Time for the companies to step up and pay what its worth to keep them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
And another from the S-dawg
|
Minimum Wages are higher in California than the federal limit, yet here the state is almost bankrupt, you have to get a permit to have a going out of business sale.
What's killing small business for the most part is insurance. Taxes are a joke with all the loop holes. Barry says he wants to close them, but that's not going to happen, Facebook gave Barry 100k and for 2012 they got a 429 million dollar refund. |
Quote:
|
I think the problem is that at some point, the American Dream went from "earn a lot of money" to "earn as much money as possible", and that's how many companies, especially investor backed ones, operate. Why pay someone $10 an hour when you can outsource for $3 an hour with only a minimal drop in production and work quality? Why price a product at $2 when you can price it at $3 and most people would still buy it?
|
bonzo. that book you just wrote completely fails to account for the overall supply of jobs relative to the supply of labor. AKA, the unemployment rate is caused by too many laborers chasing too few jobs. the wage rate is a pittance as compared to this imbalance.
your right. the minimum wage is higher then the market will bear given this discrepancy. There would be more "jobs" without one. that may be great for the "job creators" & the yacht owners. But the little guy will basically be slaves. So i would argue there is a social benefit for the poor with the minimum wage, even if the natural rate would be lower. this is why repubs fail at economics. They fail to see the lessons of the late 1800's monopolies, that unfettered capitalism is a trickle up system that ultimately creates a few john d rockellers & a nation of poor people. as bud fox once said in a good movie, how many more yachts can you buy before your happy? |
Quote:
|
Totally fucking stupid. This now costs most employers not just more money to pay someone, but also more in payroll taxes.
Now prices everywhere will go up to cover these costs then more consumers will bitch about increased costs from food to shitty products at Walmart. Fact is half the population believes they deserve more than what they are worth and refuse to take a job below $50k a year while they can sit and collect unemployment or welfare. What is the extra $1 to $1.75/hr really going to do for the average employee? Just enough to get them off welfare? |
Cost of doing business with raised fees for things like Obama Care and increased minimum wages are good for Business?
California is proof that liberals are not about business Texas is proof that a conservative approach works http://economy.money.cnn.com/2012/10...ichard-fisher/ funny read |
Quote:
What's your definition of a slave? If you have someone that wants to work but have eliminated their job you have just made a poor person. Economics is not about benefit. It is the science of scarcity and how resources get allocated. It's not republicans that are against minimum wage per say. It is anyone who knows that it won't work. It will drive labor over seas where there is no such regulation. If minimum wage works so great, then why not set the minimum wage at $100,000 per hour? It's nice to want to help the poor, but you don't do that by violating laws of economics. You can't throw rocks into a bucket and hope there will be food. Why do you think there will be economic prosperity by raising the minimum wage. There is no logic or evidence for it. Just because you want to help the poor doesn't mean your actions will. You're ignoring the law of cause and effect. The action you propose will have the OPPOSITE effect. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You admit that raising minimum wage would eliminate jobs below the equilibrium point. So if you raise minimum wage, then the person you want to help will not be making more. Therefore, you haven't helped them. Not only that but now they are unemployed. Congrats. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
and Thats from a Canadians point of view :thumbsup This shit is happening here too, we are slowly turning into British rule. |
A rise in minimum wage always brings a rise in inflation to compensate. The only reason minimum wage has ever risen is to meet the current (or projected) inflation-adjusted cost of living. You aren't magically making more wealth, you're just making more paper dollars to compensate for that dollar's value being reduced. Raising the minimum wage ahead of inflation will increase the rate of that inflation, raising it behind has at least some potential to reduce the rate.
I am often surprised at how otherwise intelligent and informed people just can't put those pieces together. Historically, minimum wage has never been enough to support a single worker family of 4. |
Quote:
Also the other person saying are sitting on welfare because they cant get a job that pays over 50k. Do you realize two things welfare isnt for life its 5 yrs.That was changed 1996,also do you realize welfare gives them shit. People are under this illusion its big money. Also walmart paying people as close to nothing as possible ,makes them a ton of money and costs the taxpayer about 400k a store. You are still paying for benefits for these poorly paid people and Walmart makes big profits. Some misfit buying cigarettes or steak with food stamps is treason but the Waltons using gov dollars to fill in what they should be paying thats fine. |
Quote:
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-...budget-surplus |
Quote:
We are still in two wars and actually he has been more aggressive than bush. No bankers have gone to jail. Gave the banks tons of money with no real rules, even after tarp. Aig gets tons of money and pays out big bonuses not a fucking word. But for homeowners its only for the "responsible" ones they want to help. The obamacare is a cash grab for insurance companies. One more time I will ask this. If the Bush tax cuts were so great, why didn't bush make them permanent ? He had the house and the senate. |
Quote:
Governor Moonbeam is doing the same thing Barry did, base numbers on a projected increase in tax revenue that will never happen. Like I said, he wants this, it probably won't happen and if it does, it won't work as projected, it never does |
Quote:
In other words...let's say Minimum Wage Guy (most likely a guy who is brand new at his job and hasn't worked long enough or done a good enough job to get a raise yet) made $100 (just using an easy number)...and his living expenses were $99. Now the miminum wage goes up and he makes $105. But businesses raise the price of goods to reflect the new higher price of labor costs. So now his living expenses are $104. Seems to me that all the minimum wage does is just keep driving prices up over the years. Also, doesn't the minimum wage only apply to full time employees? Sounds to me like a lot of folks are about to become "part time". Yes...it would be great in a world of unicorns and rainbows if we could just raise the minimum wage and everybody would now have more spending power. But here in the real world...the price of things will just go up and the new "spending power" will be nullified. I'd much rather have the minimum wage at $1 an hour and have the cost of things back to where that would actually buy you stuff. Labor costs are a HUGE part of any business. Wages, matching taxes, retirement funds, health care...it's just ridiculous. I know that I'm not here on this Earth to take care of other people like they are babies. So why would any other business want to? I don't see how anybody could think that raising the minimum wage would ever actually help anybody. And I especially can not understand the thinking behind doing it when unemployment is already so high. We should be coming up with ways to employ MORE people. Not creating new ways to make labor cost more expensive. :( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I remember many many years ago when I worked as a security guard during college. I had been there just over a year with 2 raises. Then min wage went up, and the New people now made what I did. |
Quote:
|
The idea that it is a fair contract between a rich employer and a worker is laughable.
The worker has to find money to live and eat, the capitalist has the wealth and power. Only Trade Union and socialist political parties can help redress the balance. Then we see whose side the government is really on, when it uses the full force of the state to cripple the unions, slander and destroy any real political opposition to the dictatorship of the rich. Those proposing not having a minimum are barking mad, you need a minimum amount to keep alive and to breed new workers. Remember if you have a slave you have to feed him and house him, not paying a minimum means you want to have a situation worse than slavery. A civilized society would have a living wage and a MAXIMUM wage. A maximum wage 3 times the minimum wage. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_2ooGpaU5ub...n+Harlan+1.jpg The government showing which side its on. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc