review new sexy pictures site
 

Hi all, just started new project, sexypictur.es - Sexy Pictures, site loads fast ? how about site and logo designs ?
and most important what you guys think about the domain ?
Any suggestions about categories Add more?
im not pro in this niche :)

Site is looking ok, loading without problem.

BTW, some of the pictures I have already seen, i.e. tumblr and those are not definitely your pictures. Then why you have put your watermark? Trust me, it's dangerous.

What can happen? why it's dangerous?

If those pics are copyright materials from other companies or even from someone who personally own that, you are in trouble.

all because of watermark ? all database with pictures has been updated, thanks for letting me know

If you are looking for global search traffic you probably shouldn't use the spain cctld as google might just geotarget spain for you. Matt Cutts just made a video about that a week or two ago. You can see it on youtube on google webmaster help channel. I'm on mobile right now so I dont feel like linking it.

Using a cctld as part if your name like that is fun, but less so when it is a long name. You are better off going with a dot com.

It looks as if you are cropping watermarks too, that will really piss people off.

no no, i never upload photos with watermark.

The homepage has like 0 text on it. would guess it is as low 2% text to html ratio. Sexy wallpapers link is broken. Webcams in the footer is empty. If I refresh a single image page the random image doesn't change.

Yeah thats because of plugin WP Super Cache, it helps to load images faster, Sexy wallpapers site still under construction, :Oh crap

2% text to html ratio is very bad ?

yes, woorank recommends 25%-70% ratio for seo. I would personally remove the link to wallpapers till it is ready, looks amateur to have broken links.

edit.

Adding text to to the homepage page might be tricky as its a pin(ish) type site.

good info to know thank you had a recent experience with someone removing a picture saying it was copy written which it was checked and most deff was not, yet facebook decided to remove it anyway excellent advice thanks