GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Erm so what is the difference between NK and Iraq? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1102474)

Badmaash 03-08-2013 03:26 PM

Erm so what is the difference between NK and Iraq?
 
High!

You lot got Iraq whacked and Saddam Hussein hanged for supposedly having weapons of mass destruction...... (which nobody found)

......erm so why have you lot not gone and whacked NK for the same reason?

Not much oil in NK?

????

???

??

?

_Richard_ 03-08-2013 03:28 PM

one has weapons of mass destruction

one doesn't

Badmaash 03-08-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19518569)
one has weapons of mass destruction

one doesn't

Nobody found any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq though.......

nextri 03-08-2013 03:33 PM

Iraq has oil..

MrBottomTooth 03-08-2013 03:34 PM

China......

_Richard_ 03-08-2013 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmaash (Post 19518576)
Nobody found any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq though.......

time to stay on 415 for a few weeks :winkwink:

purecane 03-08-2013 03:38 PM

nope, you're all wrong. we went to Iraq because Saddam tried to kill George Bush senior. that was personal.

Matt 26z 03-08-2013 03:45 PM

Top five reasons we won't attack NK in approximate order:

1. The US military has had substantial funding for 10+ years and does not require a war to raise money for retooling.

2. North Korea doesn't have oil they are planning on selling for something other than US dollars.

3. The US doesn't have a pressing need to enter North Korea.

4. Israel doesn't feel threatened by North Korea.

5. Current US leadership does not desire their work be defined by war.

baddog 03-08-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 19518604)
Top five reasons we won't attack NK in approximate order:

1. The US military has had substantial funding for 10+ years and does not require a war to raise money for retooling.

2. North Korea doesn't have oil they are planning on selling for something other than US dollars.

3. The US doesn't have a pressing need to enter North Korea.

4. Israel doesn't feel threatened by North Korea.

5. Current US leadership does not desire their work be defined by war.

:1orglaugh

We haven't attacked because of China.

Rochard 03-08-2013 03:56 PM

Because Iraq attacked and invaded Kuwait, giving Iraq control over a large percentage of the oil production in the Middle East. After that he got his ass kicked all the way back to Baghdad he had the balls to tell his citizens he won.

Badmaash 03-08-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19518633)
Because Iraq attacked and invaded Kuwait, giving Iraq control over a large percentage of the oil production in the Middle East. After that he got his ass kicked all the way back to Baghdad he had the balls to tell his citizens he won.

Yeah but lots of people have invaded other countries

England invaded lots of countries

USA has invaded lots of countries

....but when others invade, then it is a crime?


So when Germany tried to do it, then that was wrong??

I dont get it, if UK and USA have done it its fine but not for others to do??


Does this all just boil down to fire power?

Well looks like China and India might start invading other countries in the future by 2060??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Power_Index

mikeworks 03-08-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmaash (Post 19518567)
High!

You lot got Iraq whacked and Saddam Hussein hanged for supposedly having weapons of mass destruction...... (which nobody found)

......erm so why have you lot not gone and whacked NK for the same reason?

Because America might get it's ass kicked.

newB 03-08-2013 04:11 PM

Hussein was tried and executed by his own people, whom he had committed atrocities against (mainly the Kurdish populations) - such as test targets for his biological and chemical weapons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_b...eapons_program
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_attack

Do a search for images of the secondary and tertiary victims of those attacks - it's pretty horrific stuff.

Kim Jong-un's sabre rattling is little more than military posturing by comparison.

Badmaash 03-08-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newB (Post 19518665)
Hussein was tried and executed by his own people, whom he had committed atrocities against (mainly the Kurdish populations) - such as test targets for his biological and chemical weapons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_b...eapons_program
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_attack

Do a search for images of the secondary and tertiary victims of those attacks - it's pretty horrific stuff.

Kim Jong-un's sabre rattling is little more than military posturing by comparison.

Yah but lots of countries still commit atrocities against their own people on a weekly basis, I don't see you lot going knocking on their door!

Badmaash 03-08-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeworks (Post 19518660)
Because America might get it's ass kicked.

So why have you lot not whacked China and India then?

newB 03-08-2013 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmaash (Post 19518673)
Yah but lots of countries still commit atrocities against their own people on a weekly basis, I don't see you lot going knocking on their door!

You didn't ask about the rest of the world, you asked about North Korea.

Your weak trolling bores me. Goodbye.

Badmaash 03-08-2013 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newB (Post 19518687)
You didn't ask about the rest of the world, you asked about North Korea.

Your weak trolling bores me. Goodbye.

hahahahahhahaha

Yeah but the other guy responded, then I responded

tony286 03-08-2013 04:27 PM

I think because they have nukes, they are handled differently. With this, I can see where others countries like Iran want to get one because its a different club. If Saddam had nukes we wouldnt of gone into iraq.

_Richard_ 03-08-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmaash (Post 19518648)


Does this all just boil down to fire power?

Well looks like China and India might start invading other countries in the future by 2060??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Power_Index

yes, and we got 70% of it

China just needs to buy it's way into countries.. kinda the US Achilles heel if it wants it's currency to remain the 'global reserve'

what's funny, of course, is all the drone bases the US is building in Africa, and all the countries the Chinese are buying

Badmaash 03-08-2013 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19518695)
I think because they have nukes, they are handled differently. With this, I can see where others countries like Iran want to get one because its a different club. If Saddam had nukes we wouldnt of gone into iraq.

So its about fire power then???

Yeah you are right, its all about who got the nukes..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...uclear_weapons

CurrentlySober 03-08-2013 05:21 PM

Erm so what is the difference between NK and Iraq?
 
Approx 4401.2 Miles...


Sauce:

halfpint 03-08-2013 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 19518582)
China......

this :2 cents:

ninavain 03-08-2013 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 19518604)
Top five reasons we won't attack NK in approximate order:

1. The US military has had substantial funding for 10+ years and does not require a war to raise money for retooling.

2. North Korea doesn't have oil they are planning on selling for something other than US dollars.

3. The US doesn't have a pressing need to enter North Korea.

4. Israel doesn't feel threatened by North Korea.

5. Current US leadership does not desire their work be defined by war.

#2. North Korea doesn't have oil they are planning on selling for something other than US dollars. =truth:thumbsup

oppoten 03-08-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober (Post 19518787)
Approx 4401.2 Miles...


Sauce:

damn beat me to it :upsidedow

Captain Kawaii 03-08-2013 08:40 PM

FYI, China is busy keeping its shit together.

The Iraq thing was about oil and money and regional disruption for the sake of Israel.
Nobody gives a shit about the kurds. If Turkey and Iraq could have exterminated them they would have. Oil involved. Too messy.

You have Bremer tooling around Iraq with suitcases filled with billions that went missing. His mentor Kissinger and Cheney and company were salivating and urging boobala on.

FYI Cheney is on the board of directors for a new oil company beginning ops in Golan Heights. Only Israel thinks GH belongs to them. Not even US thinks it. But oil is there so everybody be quiet and wait for your cut.

You had Thatcher engineering illicit deals with whoever has cash in a suitcase before she croaked. She did croak right? Or is there a robot about?

Personally, I see a bunch of pots on the stove and all are simmering or boiling.

Israel and their playgroup about to go all at it. I hope they all succeed.
EU is crumbling rapidly.
US is staggering like a drunken frat boy with advanced syphilis
China is toxic. Population and crowd control through polluted environment. Who are they gonna attack? Nobody. Unless its themselves.
NK has a nice drug trade going. Do not disturb. Peeps in US making money.

My money is on India. Manufacturing and biz are fleeing China and India is offering the money kama sutra.

Its troll night at gfy. Time to get wasted.

Get over it. WW2 only ended on paper.
I love Timothy Leary and his product.

bronco67 03-09-2013 09:51 AM

It's kind of like knowing how to pick fights. You're more likely to go for the possible black eye, instead of a broken arm.

grumpy 03-09-2013 09:54 AM

one has oil

Heath 03-09-2013 10:05 AM

Clearly a troll. The question is simply too stupid to not be.

crockett 03-09-2013 10:21 AM

The only real difference, is Iraq wasn't able to do any significant damage to any of our allies if we attacked. Iraq had already attacked Kuwait the first time around so there was nothing to lose by attacking them in 91 because they already occupied Kuwait at the time.

By the second war Iraq had no real means to do any damage to Kuwait.

NK despiste the fact that 99% of the propaganda seems to be written by a 12 year old, does however have a shit load of conventional weapons which are pretty much able to do a hell of a lot of damage to South Korea.

South Korea and the fact that it's largest city ad much of it's population is with-in striking range of NK is the difference.

I do think that SK is likely secretly preparing for war, and we will probably get drug right along into it.

crockett 03-09-2013 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19519611)
It's kind of like knowing how to pick fights. You're more likely to go for the possible black eye, instead of a broken arm.

It's not us that would get the broken arm, it's South Korea. :2 cents:

seeandsee 03-09-2013 10:51 AM

kill and nuke em all

pornmasta 03-09-2013 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmaash (Post 19518567)

Not much oil in NK?

there is uranium

Pronstar 03-09-2013 11:09 AM

Gangam style
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by newB (Post 19518665)
Hussein was tried and executed by his own people, whom he had committed atrocities against (mainly the Kurdish populations) - such as test targets for his biological and chemical weapons.



Do a search for images of the secondary and tertiary victims of those attacks - it's pretty horrific stuff.

Kim Jong-un's sabre rattling is little more than military posturing by comparison.

Turkey government killed, mutilated and persecuted about one million Kurds. No one gave a damn. It's one of the most prosperous economies today.
So why all the fuss about North Korea?
Maybe US is concerned about that guy who does Gangam style safety.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123