GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why Apple is Borrowing 17 Billion dollars (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1108262)

Relentless 05-01-2013 06:12 PM

Why Apple is Borrowing 17 Billion dollars
 
Interesting read:
http://www.wired.com/business/2013/05/why-fabulously-wealthy-apple-is-borrowing-money/

leg4 05-01-2013 06:16 PM

Wall Street is buzzing about Apple issuing around $17 billion in bonds. What this means in simple terms is that Apple is borrowing billions of dollars, and paying out a small yield to the people and institutions that purchase the bonds Apple is offering.

This, of course, is the same tech company that is sitting on almost $150 billion in cash. So why would Apple borrow the money, when it already has so much of it sloshing around?

Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer spelled it out during Apple?s recent earnings call. ?We are continuing to generate significant cash offshore,? Oppenheimer told press and analysts. ?And repatriating this cash would result in significant tax consequences under current U.S. tax law.? What he didn?t quite spell out was how significant those consequences are.

?Whopping,? is how Jennifer Blouin, associate professor of accounting at the Wharton School, describes it.

As Oppenheimer points out, if Apple brought its foreign cash back stateside, it would have to fork over 35% of it in taxes under current U.S. law. The U.S will give Apple credit for taxes it already paid to foreign governments, but by Blouin?s calculation based on Apple?s 2012 10-K, Apple?s estimated foreign tax rate on its hoard of foreign earnings (i.e. its permanently reinvested earnings) is?wait for it?0.84%.


More:

http://www.wired.com/business/2013/0...rrowing-money/

CAHEK 05-01-2013 06:17 PM

http://cs521506.vk.me/u5644028/doc/f...e_drochery.gif

Fat Panda 05-01-2013 06:18 PM

typical corporate FREELOADERS. fuck apple!

http://24.media.tumblr.com/2b5874d62...zoyo1_1280.jpg

- Jesus Christ - 05-01-2013 06:20 PM

Simple answer...

Collectivism has destroyed the free market.

livexxx 05-01-2013 06:26 PM

becasue they can?

MaDalton 05-01-2013 06:27 PM

funny how that works, huh? you put your money offshore and the IRS rips you a new asshole.

but when you're a multi billion company they give you extra money at a great interest rate

TheSquealer 05-01-2013 06:28 PM

Money always flows to the path of least resistance when it comes to taxes and regulation. Ironically idiots with strongest opinions on money and taxes also tend to spend their lives flowing to the path of least resistance.

96ukssob 05-01-2013 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 19608044)
funny how that works, huh? you put your money offshore and the IRS rips you a new asshole.

but when you're a multi billion company they give you extra money at a great interest rate

I wonder how the IRS ever makes any money with all these loop holes and tax breaks.

Rochard 05-01-2013 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69 (Post 19608075)
I wonder how the IRS ever makes any money with all these loop holes and tax breaks.

I don't understand how people pay taxes. Or why. Fuck, write everything off.

BareBacked 05-01-2013 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19608126)
I don't understand how people pay taxes. Or why. Fuck, write everything off.

LOL amazing post

eroticsexxx 05-01-2013 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leg4 (Post 19608020)
if Apple brought its foreign cash back stateside, it would have to fork over 35% of it in taxes under current U.S. law. The U.S will give Apple credit for taxes it already paid to foreign governments, but by Blouin?s calculation based on Apple?s 2012 10-K, Apple?s estimated foreign tax rate on its hoard of foreign earnings (i.e. its permanently reinvested earnings) is?wait for it?0.84%.

Exactly right.

To go from less than a percent of taxes to 35% is insane.

bronco67 05-01-2013 08:30 PM

So if taxes were lower, maybe more business wouldn't take their money overseas -- and the government would end up making more. In reality, they would still do it because they don't want to pay any fucking taxes...meanwhile I make jack shit and have to give up a good part of my income. Fuck Apple and all of those other big companies that skirt the system.

KillerK 05-01-2013 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19608126)
I don't understand how people pay taxes. Or why. Fuck, write everything off.

It's easy to pay no taxes like you. But I don't want to limit my earnings to $50k a year.

Supz 05-01-2013 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 19608170)
So if taxes were lower, maybe more business wouldn't take their money overseas -- and the government would end up making more. In reality, they would still do it because they don't want to pay any fucking taxes...meanwhile I make jack shit and have to give up a good part of my income. Fuck Apple and all of those other big companies that skirt the system.

They aren't really skirting the system. its not like they are dumping US money offshore. This is money that was spent on apple products overseas. Not in the US. So They are manufactured outside the US, and sold outside the US. Why would they pay US taxes on them?

OneHungLo 05-01-2013 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19608126)
I don't understand how people pay taxes. Or why. Fuck, write everything off.

Let us know how that pans out in an audit.

MrMaxwell 05-01-2013 11:55 PM

So let's recap

Apple sells its pure garbage no one needs all over the united states which is a HUGE chunk of its business. Then it decides to bank massive amounts of money overseas where they don't pay much taxes.

Am I getting that about right? Or am I way off?

You know, this country is run as if there were a magical herd of retarded monkeys with super powers who are able to assrape the masses at will with total impunity.

Here's a wild idea: Let's lower taxes in the USA and 95%+ of huge businesses won't be circumventing our tax codes which causes them to end up sucking money from our economy and paying taxes to other countries, instead.

Not to mention what lower taxes would do for the business climate (small and large) overall. The greedy money hole loving idiots would make MORE in taxes by charging LESS if you ask me.


Supz 05-02-2013 12:27 AM

Whats the rate on bonds

DWB 05-02-2013 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supz (Post 19608262)
They aren't really skirting the system. its not like they are dumping US money offshore. This is money that was spent on apple products overseas. Not in the US. So They are manufactured outside the US, and sold outside the US. Why would they pay US taxes on them?

You beat me to it. Not to mention, they do pay taxes in those other countries. It just happens to be a lot lower than what they would pay in the USA. That is how international business works. If the US based company then brings that money back into the USA, they get penalized for doing so. I'm actually surprised anyone repatriates money earned abroad.

So now they want to borrow money to do X instead of repatriate money and lose 35% of it for no real reason other than the IRS wants it. That is a no brainer. Good for Apple.

SomeCreep 05-02-2013 04:07 AM

Apple is pretty smart.

- Jesus Christ - 05-02-2013 04:20 AM

DWB,

When discussing bitcoin you repeatedly make arguments based on "THE GOVERNMENTS GONNA COME GET YOU". Yet, when apple avoids taxes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19608370)
Good for Apple.

Once again... I must request that you remove references to Socrates from your sig, his corpse is flopping about like a fish.

DWB 05-02-2013 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by - Jesus Christ - (Post 19608405)
When discussing bitcoin you repeatedly make arguments based on "THE GOVERNMENTS GONNA COME GET YOU". Yet, when apple avoids taxes.

Apple isn't avoiding taxes. They pay them in all the countries they operate in. They operate within the legal boundaries of the law and use that to their advantage. Not repatriating money earned abroad is not illegal.

Bitcoin is an unregulated currency being used for illegal activity, including the sale of drugs, firearms, child porn, and people via human trafficking, not to mention being used for money laundering. So yea, there is a high chance of government regulation or crackdown of some kind, if for no other reason than it is a competing currency, which historically doesn't work out too well.

I'm a bit surprised I even had to explain the difference between the two. But then again, that explains your next comment...

Quote:

Originally Posted by - Jesus Christ - (Post 19608405)
Once again... I must request that you remove references to Socrates from your sig, his corpse is flopping about like a fish.

Once again.... figure out what slander means and get back to me.

- Jesus Christ - 05-02-2013 05:11 AM

I explained to you once already that I'm not directly talking about the quote. Socrates was all about logic. You are doing all kinds of verbal acrobatics to AVOID logic.

Someone can view child porn on apple products. Someone can conduct a drug deal on an IPhone.

You are willfully ignorant and an enemy of all free men.

pornguy 05-02-2013 05:16 AM

The US government gives a tax break on money earned outside the US but still wants to tax if the money comes in.

What apple is doing is smart.

Lykos 05-02-2013 05:19 AM

Wow, this is interesting indeed...

- Jesus Christ - 05-02-2013 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 19608473)
gives a tax break

It's interesting how much word choice says about a persons perspective.

The government isn't GIVING anything, the government is simply STEALING less.

purecane 05-02-2013 05:25 AM

the CEO's name is oppenheimer.....research that family and you'll see how apple gets away with this shit.

Relentless 05-02-2013 05:31 AM

The 'news' here has very little to do with taxes and a lot to do with the end of nationalism.

In the past the success of a company was tied directly to the country, region, city and society it was part of, no matter what industry it was in or where sales were generated. Take Hershey as an example, they built a massive business for its time and created a thriving town in Pennsylvania as a direct result. They sold their products globally but worked under the ethos that their employees, country, government and the society around them were vital to their continued success.

In the modern era, rightly or wrongly, that ethos is gone. Companies do not feel any connection to society, and neither do wealthy oligarchs. They feel no obligation to the people who work for them, live in cities near their factories, provide a consumer base for their products or a tax base for the infrastructure they utilize. More than that, they see zero connection between their success (past, present or future) and society around them.

Rather than a period of symbiotic capitalism that promotes a healthy and prosperous relationship between corporations and society, which would allow capitalism to flourish for centuries... we are headed deeper into the abyss of confrontational capitalism where corporations and society fight with each other continually to the detriment of both.

arock10 05-02-2013 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purecane73 (Post 19608488)
the CEO's name is oppenheimer.....research that family and you'll see how apple gets away with this shit.

You mean CFO

DWB 05-02-2013 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by - Jesus Christ - (Post 19608468)
I explained to you once already that I'm not directly talking about the quote. Socrates was all about logic. You are doing all kinds of verbal acrobatics to AVOID logic.

My logic is sound. My sig is about slander.

When Apple breaks the law let me know and I'll adjust my comments about it. In the meantime, you should try to educate yourself on how international business and tax law works.

Quote:

Originally Posted by - Jesus Christ - (Post 19608468)
Someone can view child porn on apple products. Someone can conduct a drug deal on an IPhone.

That's honestly the best reply you could come up with?

:helpme

The fate of Bitcoin isn't for me to decide. But I don't see any reason to stick my head in the sand about the reality of the situation. You can day dream all you want about it, but it won't change the facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by - Jesus Christ - (Post 19608468)
You are willfully ignorant and an enemy of all free men.

Says the guy who doesn't understand that Apple isn't breaking the law and thinks there is no risk to Bitcoin.

You know, I like you better when you post as JohhnyClips. At least on that account you're a little bit funny.

DWB 05-02-2013 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 19608473)
The US government gives a tax break on money earned outside the US but still wants to tax if the money comes in.

What apple is doing is smart.

It is smart, and I don't blame them. No reason to have 35% of your money taken for bringing it back to the USA, especially since it was earned abroad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by - Jesus Christ - (Post 19608483)

The government isn't GIVING anything, the government is simply STEALING less.

In other news, have you heard about gravity? It holds us to the planet and you can't escape it. Bummer, huh?

notjoe 05-02-2013 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19608454)
Apple isn't avoiding taxes. They pay them in all the countries they operate in. They operate within the legal boundaries of the law and use that to their advantage. Not repatriating money earned abroad is not illegal.

Bitcoin is an unregulated currency being used for illegal activity, including the sale of drugs, firearms, child porn, and people via human trafficking, not to mention being used for money laundering. So yea, there is a high chance of government regulation or crackdown of some kind, if for no other reason than it is a competing currency, which historically doesn't work out too well.

I'm a bit surprised I even had to explain the difference between the two. But then again, that explains your next comment...



Once again.... figure out what slander means and get back to me.

It's also being used for legitimate reasons. I bought a monitor using Digital Currency.

xNetworx 05-02-2013 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 19608256)
It's easy to pay no taxes like you. But I don't want to limit my earnings to $50k a year.

:1orglaugh

Countdown to Rochard's first audit....3.....2.....

_Richard_ 05-02-2013 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leg4 (Post 19608020)
Wall Street is buzzing about Apple issuing around $17 billion in bonds. What this means in simple terms is that Apple is borrowing billions of dollars, and paying out a small yield to the people and institutions that purchase the bonds Apple is offering.

This, of course, is the same tech company that is sitting on almost $150 billion in cash. So why would Apple borrow the money, when it already has so much of it sloshing around?

Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer spelled it out during Apple?s recent earnings call. ?We are continuing to generate significant cash offshore,? Oppenheimer told press and analysts. ?And repatriating this cash would result in significant tax consequences under current U.S. tax law.? What he didn?t quite spell out was how significant those consequences are.

?Whopping,? is how Jennifer Blouin, associate professor of accounting at the Wharton School, describes it.

As Oppenheimer points out, if Apple brought its foreign cash back stateside, it would have to fork over 35% of it in taxes under current U.S. law. The U.S will give Apple credit for taxes it already paid to foreign governments, but by Blouin?s calculation based on Apple?s 2012 10-K, Apple?s estimated foreign tax rate on its hoard of foreign earnings (i.e. its permanently reinvested earnings) is?wait for it?0.84%.


More:

http://www.wired.com/business/2013/0...rrowing-money/

can you imagine being forced to pay a 35% tax rate on income?

so brutal.

JP-pornshooter 05-02-2013 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19608370)
You beat me to it. Not to mention, they do pay taxes in those other countries. It just happens to be a lot lower than what they would pay in the USA. That is how international business works. If the US based company then brings that money back into the USA, they get penalized for doing so. I'm actually surprised anyone repatriates money earned abroad.

So now they want to borrow money to do X instead of repatriate money and lose 35% of it for no real reason other than the IRS wants it. That is a no brainer. Good for Apple.

I thought any US entity was tax liable to uncle Sam regardless where the money is earned, and regardless of where the funds are physically located.

Relentless 05-02-2013 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19608901)
I thought any US entity was tax liable to uncle Sam regardless where the money is earned, and regardless of where the funds are physically located.

That's the whole point....

Large corporations are not 'US Entities', they aren't "EU Entities", they are completely disconnected from the health, success or prosperity of the places they profit from. The idea of a 'multinational corporation' is obsolete... they aren't multinational any more... they are completely distinct from the societies that support them.:2 cents:

epitome 05-02-2013 11:32 AM

Trust, all of that money wasn't earned abroad. Like other companies a lot of it was shoveled out of the U.S. into lower/no tax jurisdictions using "patent licenses" and other creative loopholes.

Create the technology in your home country, offshore the rights to it.

It's been done forever and it won't stop because people make blanket statements like "that money was earned offshore."

Gotta love a company that puts Cupertino on every product trying to draw away from the fact that it was made in China, only to keep their money offshore, too.

The back of an iPhone should say "Designed by Apple in Cupertino. Made in China. Your Money Went to Ireland."

Relentless 05-02-2013 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19608980)
The back of an iPhone should say "Designed by Apple in Cupertino. Made in China. Your Money Went to Ireland."

No it didn't.
Your money didn't go to Ireland either in any appreciable sense. It may have visited Ireland, but it will almost certainty not be significantly taxed by Ireland or get spent in Ireland. :2 cents:

MrMaxwell 05-02-2013 02:56 PM

Well, I guess if it's money they didn't even make here, that's okay. I fucking hate apple but you can't blame them for not wanting to be fucked out of money they made overseas. I suppose.

Juicy D. Links 05-02-2013 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CAHEK (Post 19608022)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

_Richard_ 05-02-2013 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 19608287)
Let us know how that pans out in an audit.

it's just a wink wink nudge nudge situation

beerptrol 05-02-2013 03:28 PM

Why tie up 17 billion of your own money, when you can use other peoples money at a low interest or cost to you

2MuchMark 05-02-2013 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beerptrol (Post 19609363)
Why tie up 17 billion of your own money, when you can use other peoples money at a low interest or cost to you

That is EXACTLY right.

First in case anyone didn't know, it is currently very very cheap to borrow money. Try going for a car or house loan and they will trip over themselves to give you the loan at super low interest and give you all kinds of crazy incentives.

Also, big companies do this all the time. Here in Montreal there's a company called Bombardier. They are known for making snowmobiles but they also build passenger jets and other planes. They have an amazing scam going on. They borrow money from the government to bid on a contract, and borrow again to build the plane. The government awards them the money up front which is quickly invested and makes crazy interest. They also get crazy tax credits for being a job creator in Montreal. I wouldn't be surprised if they never spend a dime of their own money for anything. The loans are always insured of course meaning that neither they nor the government takes any real risk.

If you think this is nuts, just look into big oil and how they get and spend money. It'll make you sick.

Dankasaur 05-02-2013 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supz (Post 19608262)
They aren't really skirting the system. its not like they are dumping US money offshore. This is money that was spent on apple products overseas. Not in the US. So They are manufactured outside the US, and sold outside the US. Why would they pay US taxes on them?

:thumbsup:thumbsup

epitome 05-02-2013 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19609026)
No it didn't.
Your money didn't go to Ireland either in any appreciable sense. It may have visited Ireland, but it will almost certainty not be significantly taxed by Ireland or get spent in Ireland. :2 cents:

Yup, the ol double irish with a Dutch sandwich accounting trick.

Ends in the Cayman islands.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc