Star trek "into the darkness" review
 

It serves the purpose,but i kind a got impression how they recycled old movies/tv series into one piece.Still,visual work is amazing.

Going to see it today.

damn really? i thought the first movie was very well done/written well

had high hopes!

I loved how the first one basically re wrote history, I'm going to see the movie soon

whos the villian??

Well,normally that would be considered as spoiler,but since villain is same as in previous movie(and it was rumored since production started to be that one)i will tell.(and that is one of the reason why i kind a feel disappointing)

'History'?

You do realize that...

So basically it's like they combined stories of second and fourth movie.

knew it was him.

For real? Hollywood keeps re-making the same fucking movies over and over again. Do we really need Khan as the villain in Star Trek again? It's the same with the superhero movies. The same damn origin story re-told every time they reboot the franchise with a new director. The same most popular villain yet *again*- the Joker for Batman played by a new actor in each generation; Lex Luthor for Superman over and over and over again. Why can't they ever advance the story for crying out loud?

I will be going to see this tomorrow! After Oblivion I need a little pick me up ;)

You forgot amazing spiderman and king kong :upsidedow But that is how things working now,use same story,go left instead right to make a difference,and use awesome new visuals.And that equal profit $$$

aw shit I was hoping for a new story too...i hate it when they recycle a movie...

Not a fan but I am sure I will enjoy it.

even if it is the same bad guy Im going to watch it and enjoy it damn it.

people take things too seriously...

i dont give a crap as long the movie per se is good

last night i saw Iron Man 3 - and while surely not the best movie i have ever seen, i was still very much entertained and really liked it

then i go to IMDB and people write crap reviews because the Mandarin is not like the Mandarin from the comic books bla bla bla...

i dont give a shit, i never read the comics anyways

gonna see it the weekend :)

Lex Luthor has nothing to do with the new Man of Steel movie.

I'm a huge Star Trek fan and still watch the original series whenever it's on. I know it borders on campy but it's still good TV to me :-)

-- Bill

Most of the next generation (the Roddenberry ones anyway) were rehashes of original series stories for the most part. Same with the movies. Vger was just nomad all over again and Star Trek 5(6?) was a rehash of the search for Eden, except this time across the barrier and some half brother of Spock was leading them to God.. etc. Wouldn't have expected much different really. They've done so many cool stories; might as well.

Star Trek was always "reality based" meaning, the people in the film are real human beings. (no offense to Vulcans) Which is what gives the series a real sense and we can relate to it.

The trailer looks like an action movie and they are turning Kirk and Spock into action heroes. Jumping off cliffs, etc... doing stunts that are not humanly possible, for shock value.

I haven't seen it yet, but I fear they are losing the Star Trek "feel" and turning the series into Mission Impossible 5 with space ships and aliens.

I hope the new movie has a script.

Remember "City on the Edge of Forever" written by Harlan Ellison?..... now THAT is Star Trek. These new movies don't come near the intellect or substance as the old series did.

Just a lot of flash and explosions for all the kids lit up on sugar to zone out on.

Well they did call Superman 7 .... "Man of Steel" this time. Does that count? :winkwink: