![]() |
Is Bitcoin about to be regulated?
Sorry Franck. :Oh crap I know how much you wanted to believe this was impossible.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Good news is, they are looking at how to regulate it instead of just trying to strong arm it out of existence. Bad news is, if regulated and no longer anonymous, what is the point? |
looks like bitcoin community is viewing this as good news, price has been stable in the 110-120 range for a week, and this morning it's even pushing upwards towards 120... :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
without forking blockchain and actually convince users to switch to your version, you cannot simply change properties and features of bitcoin. maximum a regulatory force could achieve is a split, newer 'whitehat' version and existing to go underground.
in current form bitcoin cannot be regulated and it seems officials get at least that point, unlike some on here what they want/will regulate and tax is (fiat) money in and out. it seems pretty reasonable and certainly achievable as most fiat transactions are electronic. good luck figuring out closed door/cash deals, exactly just like with current, real money today. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
DWB, that's what i mean by saying "regulating and taxing fiat money in and out", i just don't look at it as Bitcoin itself being regulated that way.
|
Quote:
|
this sounds interesting .....
|
Bitcoin is already taxed in the US, or at least is supposed to be, just like Paypal income.
|
Quote:
The matter it is the "know your customer" banking regulations. At least at the point you convert cash into bitcoin, or bitcoin into cash, you should know who paid who. Banks are closing accounts of all the exchangers lately. Also, except trading bitcoin just for the sake of gamble on it, I see bitcoins are mostly used for anonymous transactions such as in silk-road to buy things you don't want anyone know you purchased. So I don't think this "user base" blends well with regulations. Further, bitcoin it is pseudonymous, not anonymous, because erveryone knows what address paid what other address - then at the moment someone cashes in dollar, must use a bank, and you know who gets the money, along with all the traces back to what he purchased in first place. There are bitcoin laundering services for this purpose but they're messy and shady. But bitcoin it could be ehnanced in a future to make transactions really untraceable, with Zerocoin add-on or similar: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Zerocoin If that's implemented, then really the govt's or banks can not know who paid who, and simply have people who go cash bitcoins coming from "nowhere", not even another address. At that point it could be there will be 2 type if coins, the traceable and anonymous ones. Those traceable will be legal but must declare all and send ID's like an payoneer/paxum card; those not traceable will be simply illegal for anyone to convert from and to cash. |
Dept. of Homeland Security freezes accounts between Dwolla and bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox
http://pandodaily.com/2013/05/14/dep...xchange-mt-gox Oh dear! :Oh crap Bad news = Price plunge! Will be interesting to see where the price goes to tomorrow! Down from $120 to $110 so far |
from cnet:
- ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) Homeland Security confirms an ongoing investigation that lead to court order closing Mt.Gox's Dwolla account. ICE focus on drug smuggling, financial and computer crimes, export enforcement. Seized Internet domain names, sports streaming sites, arresting for jailbreaking game consoles. - Let's see the price graph: http://bitcoinity.org/markets/image?...4h&size=medium http://bitcoinity.org/markets/image?span=7d&size=medium |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc