Right Wing GOP Talker Says Hillary Clinton Should "Be Shot In The Vagina"
 

This guy needs a bitchslap. He's wants his piece of the GOP pundit pie, and he knows he needs to say shit like this to get noticed. He said he wants Hillary Clinton to die slowly. The FBI will pay him a visit, as it should be.

?I want to shoot [Clinton] right in the vagina and I don?t want her to die right away,?
Read more at http://hypervocal.com/news/2013/radi...0KYZYL655ut.99

yeah? so what?

So nothing, I guess. I mean it's not like what he said is sick and frightening and criminal or anything. It's simply common political discourse. Carry on. :)

When he's in Guantanamo...HE'LL be the vagina, lol

Interesting GIF you got there. :thumbsup

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Seems you need a little refresher from the Bush years.

so your suggesting you oppose the first amendment when speech is "sick" & "frightening" & "criminal". you think the FBI should do something about nonsensical hyperbole? or do you honestly think he was going to do it?

so much for being progressive. :(

Anyone in politics who talks like that... Shouldn't be allowed to be in politics.

Bullet-proof vagina:

http://thenakedlistener.files.wordpr...0515955562.jpg

http://i457.photobucket.com/albums/q...unnysaying.jpg

http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/a...catpuncher.jpg

:stoned

ADG

Yeah, I get your joke --- but why are all of the scum on the right wing side?

Really? You're comparing that to this pig saying Hillary is a "C U Next Tuesday" who he wants to personally "shoot in the vagina" and hope she dies slowly? Are you really saying that? Be gone. :disgust

Um, did you check the link?

why not. if he's not going to actually shoot hilary in the clam, what harm did he cause? other then him making an ass of himself.

this is a fucking porno forum, with posters wanting others banned, or investigated for provocative words.

wow. :helpme

Politics is personality. If one is cruel, selfish, violent, ignorant, where on the political spectrum will they fall? They will fall on the side that promotes war, capital punishment, greed, and bigotry. We know what side that is. This guy is a prefect example of that side.

you totally avoided my question. do you support free speech or not. your words indicate you think speech that is hateful should be punished.

Hate speech and murderous threats are ok with you? Not with me.

so the USSR never promoted war, capital punishment, greed or bigotry?

there is a difference between a klansman rallying a mob & a talk radio host trying to make ratings. you are unable to make the distinction?

"Hate speech" is slippery and hard to define. Threats of murder? That isn't.

If he said he wanted to shoot you in the twat on the radio, is that fine?

If he tried to "make ratings" by way of graphic murderous threats on a public figure?

What the fuck are you talking about?

one must use their wisdom to decide if the words are a credible threat, or just bluster. i say again. are you unable to tell the difference?

i was referring to your comment that only one side of the political spectrum promotes war & racism, history has ample examples of extremism, murder & genocide from communists. or did you cut class when they taught about the soviet union that day?

come on grant, dont go to bed. just reply to this multiple guess question -

which of these violates free speech?

a) talk radio host trying to make a name in an industry saturated with shock jocks
b) a muslim with a bomb building site telling others to build these bombs & use them in public places
c) the movie "birth of a nation"

by your comments, all 3 appear to be crimes. so please turn in your progressive badge because you dont support free speech. you are just a left wing hater with a fetish for hating the right. nothing else.

Genius, you can't threaten to shoot people. That's a crime. Look it up. Bye.

First amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.

So why does the government involve itself with religious topics and events?

We need to go back to the original Constitution and get rid of these stupid laws and politicians.

Really? That doesn't even make sense. I was referring to individuals; where their politics meet their personality.

so the answer is no, you cannot make a distinction between a legitimate threat & radio show nonsense. but you know the correct answer. the FBI is not going to arrest pete santilli. as there was no crime, no legit threat.

you really are dumber then a 5th grader.

:1orglaugh

misdirection gets you nowhere.

you said "one side promotes war etc etc", obviously ignoring history & communists that declared wars, killed people in gestapos, & kept all the wealth of the nation centered in the communist govt.

your further thoughts on "individuals" & their place on the spectrum are irrelevant to your error that evil only falls on one side.

case closed. you lose.

:1orglaugh

grant. I offer you this wisdom just once. Stop posting your hateful, one-sided, myopic, ignorant-of-history crybaby tantrums. you embarrass yourself, your family, the school you went to, & the left wing as a whole.

all you prove is newtons 3rd law - for every retard on the right like pete santilli, there is an equal & opposite retard on the left like grantmercury.

:GFYBand

So let the death threats fly? It's legal to make threats on people's lives because on a case-by-case basis each threat can be evaluated, and only after it's determined "they meant it" will they be prosecuted? Really? What a retard. :321GFY

A DEATH THREAT IS A CRIME - and on a public official, a particularly serious one. Bye.

"I want to" is not a death threat. Though I will agree, pretty stupid.

I can't tell you how many times I have heard people say "I want to kill George Bush", none of those were death threats. Silly and pointless banter. Right on this board I'm sure we can find a few thousand instances of that happening. Would you be upset about that as well?

What about Mitch McConnell? Mr. Boehner?

Why so surprised? He's just another fucking far-right idiot embarrassment to the world of politics. Nothing that republicans in government say or do surprise people anymore. All they want to do is keep the world for the good-ol' boys network and they don't care who's rights they trample, who's children get shot, or who's air they pollute. Fuck those old bastards.

Sorry, you're in no position to offer wisdom. You're a dumbass, and your foolish, poorly thought out posts prove it. Carry on.

http://proudtobeafilthyliberalscum.f...bass_thumb.jpg

I can't argue with any of that. :thumbsup

Did you check the link?

I was referring to Republicans with a right wing, fascist ideology.