![]() |
Our legal system is so fucked up!
Someone is found innocent of a major crime. Should be the end of it right?
No, now you have to go thru a civil trial and then a federal civil rights violation trial. Who the hell can afford the mental, and financial stress of THREE possible trials for the same crime? . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Were you bitching when OJ was tried in civil court?
|
Quote:
The FBI already cleared Zimmerman of anything racist, or any civil rights violations, and under Florida law, if his case is covered by "Stand Your Ground", he can't be sued in any civil suits. |
He is INNOCENT, their case against him was BS from the start!
There should have NEVER been a case to start! Watch the trial videos .. its clear as fucking day! |
Quote:
|
System has always been like that. The bar to win a civil suit is set much lower than that of a criminal case. Think of criminal as being yes or no and civil being based on percentages.
It can't be fair in some instances (OJ) and unfair in others (Zimmerman). I love how some people will say OJ was guilty despite being found not guilty in criminal court, but will then say Casey Anthony was not guilty because the court said so. Fact of the matter is a jurists vote is just an opinion and most people are just a summons away from being able to express theirs and it be official. Supreme Court is a great example of this. They all hear the same case and can form very different opinions, oftentimes being based on whether they're liberal, conservative or in between. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...se?lite
Quote:
|
To me, and I am obviously no lawyer, it seems like it will be hard for him to use the Stand Your Ground law to avoid being sued civilly. Trayvon Martin was there with his dad visiting his dad's girlfriend. He had a legal right to be where he was. You could make the argument that Martin had the right to stand his ground when Zimmerman started following him.
If he is unable to use the Stand Your Ground defense and goes to trail he may be in big trouble. In a wrongful death case you don't have to prove the case beyond any reasonable doubt you just have to show that a preponderance of the evidence shows that this person's actions led to the death of the victim. That being the case Martin's family will argue that Zimmerman followed Martin and that his following led to the confrontation that led to Martin's death. I can see how a jury can find against Zimmerman in that instance. The homeowner's association felt their odds in court were bad enough that they chose to settle. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Alcohol is legal right? but being drunk on the sidewalk is an offence? I seen some videos on web where people get arrested for being drunk on the street, while they are not doing anyone any harm they are just trying to go home. If this is the case then bar's and club's should been the one responsible for these people getting home.
|
Quote:
|
The letter of the law was upheld,good or bad. Everyone should of looked at the facts to know he would be found not guilty.
Yet much like OJ he will likely be found guilty in a civil case in which he should be. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They should have prosecuted him for manslaughter from the get go, and gone with that relevant evidence. They instead tried to be too clever, hoped that the 'charge cascade' worked (lol I like that phrase, I should copyright it or something then take everyones domains blah blah), and through their own incompetence saw the letter of the law come back to bite them in the ass, and rightfully so.
|
You have to remember that a child lost his life. Which is the greater inconvenience, to have to go through a few extra trials or to be dead at 17? It's not like Zimmerman is being accused of shoplifting. I doubt there will be a civil rights trial (The DoJ didn't think racism was involved). There might be a civil trial but that's the right of Trayvon's parents.
|
Quote:
I can't reasonably just walk up to teenagers on the street, follow them around, and demand of them "What are you doing here?!" with my hand on my gun every time I feel they are suspicious. Well I guess I legally COULD here in the Wild Wild West of Florida but eventually it's going to get me in some serious trouble. |
I don't know how someone can shoot and kill someone who was on his way home from a convenience store, and is allowed to be free.
There are people in jail for much, much less than that. That's why it's a a fucked up system. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
When there is no eye-witness and only testimonial supposition or circumstantial evidence a criminal defendant usually walks -- "proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" is the legal requirement in the USA. |
Quote:
|
Someone let me know when L-Pink get's back to Fl.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
how about this: what if the kid had went out to drop off money to the dealer for selling an oz of heroin, was on the way back home, stopped at the store.... you have no idea if that's what happened or not and you never will with the media/black grievance community manipulating the dialog0 this is just as realistic as any other scenario |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If he were 100% honest and took responsibility without making anything up I would have supported him and respected him much more than I do now. I think it's shitty to make up things about the KID you shot in order to save your own ass. It's cowardice. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123