MP behind UK internet porn filter hacked, accuses blogger who reported it
 

http://www.zdnet.com/mp-behind-uk-in...it-7000018542/

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6...fhi2o1_400.gif

Saw that this morning. How THE FUCK is that woman advising Cameron? DVTimes understands the internet more than her.

"Heck of a job, Brownie."

Maybe she's good in bed?

Not sure that's actually possible.

Good!!!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK EM

"hosting a link that distributed porn via my website"


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

"It became disturbingly clear that MP Perry does not know how hyperlinks, websites, the fundamentals of content distribution works."

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Please sign the petition.

https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/

To stop uk goverment to impose ban on porn

http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/...ry_256325k.jpg
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...3_68925808.jpg


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/...y_2443888a.jpg

And that pic... U mad?

Here is the link to the petition.
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/51746

Good call, I think all webmasters with uk traffic should put this link on their sites maybe with some notification like: "Soon you won't be able to access our site from any public places in the Great Britain and if you like to be able to access it in your own home then you will have to contact your ISP and ask them to opt out the filter which will make it obvious for everyone in your home what are you looking for. If you don't like the idea of this bullshit sign the petition."

Sadly i don't think this or any other petitions or anything will have any effect whatsoever...

I doubt as well, but if people will do nothing and don't even say their no then it's like allowing them for even more. Other European countries will observe and follow same route. And soon we will wake up in reality with no freedom of speech and total surveillance that even China and other socialist countries will look like some liberal oasis of freedom.

If we got 100,000 petition filled than they have to debate on it in house of common before it get passed...... we just cant say them yes block it! Its a silly idea....

They have to keep in mind that stuff which get blocked for any reason people will curious to saw that.

Lack of net porn, Sexual assault will be on the rise.

Not to mention lots of frustrated/angry men walking around.

Porn is therapy for some people, some people need it because they have absolutely no way of getting any, ever.

Sad but very true.

in Italy there's Laura Boldrini, President of the Chamber of Deputies
who sends (only 8 hours after) the police to the home of a person that published a caricature of her on facebook

http://img.ibtimes.com/it/data/image...a-boldrini.jpg
http://sempresicilia.files.wordpress...lla-camera.jpg
http://www.giornalettismo.com/wp-con...ke-770x512.jpg

Read the full story

Could be wrong but I think I read somewhere that the default filter only will apply to new customers. In that case, it will take many years before it has any effect. If any at all.

Bet most religious nuts with existing lines will not ask to turn it on. "Just in case" :1orglaugh

Most religious nuts are the biggest fucking hypocrites that do even more naughty things when no one is looking. I think many would opt out. :winkwink: