Father uk?
 

is that what brits are calling cameron? :helpme :1orglaugh what's the juicy mates? :1orglaugh

Cameron must stand by his pledge on porn

With grim predictability, the liberal Left has raised one spurious objection after another to David Cameron’s planned curbs on the scourge of online porn.

Some claim that internet-savvy paedophiles will find it simple to get round his new rules, which would ban search engines from listing any results in response to requests for child porn.

Others have accused him of retreating after he said that ‘soft’ material, such as the Sun’s Page 3 or written pornography, would remain freely available to all.

Preposterously, some even say his default block on obscene sites would filter out educational material on sexual health – or works of fine art such as Rubens’s Rape of the Sabine Women.

This is all smokescreen and sophistry.

Everyone with any common sense knows the kind of disgusting, explicit material the Prime Minister has in mind when he demands that internet giants face up to their moral responsibilities.

True, there may be problems of legal definition. But there are none that a skilled parliamentary draftsman – or the wisdom of a jury – cannot surmount.

All who heard the Prime Minister’s impassioned speech on Monday will know how strongly he believes everything possible must be done to protect children and the future of our society from the insidious menace of online porn.


full article..

The guy is a fucking menace - Everyone is too scared to say anything because of the 'child' word - If you don't agree with Cameron then you must be a pedophile...

Anything on a banned list of searches will just end up with a new name for it the same as drugs are known as a billion different names for exactly the same thing.

Well, we would vote the Tories in.

Pity Scotland wasn't independent before the elections... Hopefully it happens next year.

off topic do you sport tube socks with your kilt? :helpme

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/...p-surveillance

How much hypocrisy it takes to now just do the same in own country under the cover of "protect children" phrase.

Instead of teaching parents how to create user profiles and how to install filters on their kids computers he wants to force internet censorship for everyone in the UK.

it's a rights violation. im wondering how much will be enough. :2 cents: then the violence will begin! :evil-laug

The Tea Act, passed by Parliament on May 10, 1773

took them almost 3 years to get it in gear. let's see if brits will fight for their rights.