John Kerry Admits Building 7 Was A Controlled Demolition
 

https://youtube.com/watch?v=iHKgMssSIEk



https://youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I

https://sphotos-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/h...11577993_n.jpg

If True, LOL

Glad to hear such a big name willing to admit it

You should really listen again

nice find on the first video

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I heard him say "they did it in a controlled fashion". Perhaps it's you who should listen again :winkwink:

Not a huge shocker that conspiracy theorists are also the same broke assholes always complaining they can't make any money and who fumble through each day believing everything is beyond their control . After all, the alternative would be that you accept personal accountability and lets face it, you are the ditch diggers, not the rocket scientists and you don't need the headaches

Even if such a correlation did exist; correlation does not equal causation :2 cents:

Over time, all lies are eventually revealed...

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.n...80845409_n.jpg

If he knew this, why did he wait nearly 12 years to come forward? Did the guilt of obstructing justice finally wear him down.

Says the guy who posts non stop bullshit with the exact opposite intended message

It tickles me silly when you guys use partial conversations to "prove a point" or bust someone for "admitting" evil doing. It's really quite funny. Right up there with Michael Moore. Congratulations!

So, lets be clear here. The image suggests he was paid double on a claim. Really?

Fucking retards.

Don't you believe in luck? :winkwink:

You people are so desperate to believe this was an inside job you will grab at any straws....

Kerry DID NOT say "the building was brought down in a controlled fashion".

What he said was "They made a decision based on the danger of it destroying other thigns and they did it in a controlled fashion." Seems to me he is talking about how they ordered the evacuation of the building.

Keep trying though kids.

I see you are happy to side-step the words of John Kerry :error

Misdirection much?

Why so much anger?

Remember, a lie is a lie, even if everyone believes it. The truth is the truth, even if no one believes it.

I am not looking for something that just isn't there. You are. You NEED to believe something and you search for anything validates that belief. It doesn't make you more informed or enlightened, it makes you a fucking idiot who will always be a drain on society, a corrosive force and one that needs therapy.

You are confusing, delusion, conjecture, speculation and misinterpretation with "the truth". The only truth is that you guys need psychological help that you are clearly not getting. Its partly society thats failing you.

You admit that you are not looking for something which you have assumed is not there; this is why you will not see :2 cents:

Right... this is why its major news right now all over the world. Because he clearly said what you interpret him as saying. It's a game changer that no one noticed but a handful of kooks.

Sounds legit.

By the way, i post on this forum in between reconciling all my media buy accounts and counting my money and working out. You fucking clowns are posting here and posting non stop bullshit because you make no money and have nothing to do but try to find new proof of why the entire world is working against you.

You are literally a few logical conclusions away from shooting pedestrians from a freeway overpass.

You are a fake nick troll, not a real poster, those who've been here long enough know that :2 cents:

Speaking of looking for things that just aren't there...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPRILY10Ms4

Got proof of that ? You accused me the other day of hacking your account you fucking brainless twit. Got proof of that?

You need meds and therapy.

Hopefully you get locked up before you hurt someone.

I have thought that before as well. Any idea who he might be?

Yes, we all fully understand that there are 1000s of similarly minded psychos. This is the problem with the internet. A fistful of socially retarded, unpopular, mentally unsound losers, getting together believing they have more answers than the other 7 billion people on the planet.

The government controlled media did a masterful job convincing the FOOLS that 911 was concocted by cave people. And by "FOOLS" I mean people who are easily fooled.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98

A reminder for those of you who are certain that they know the truth...

There are over 2,000 religions on planet Earth, and the followers of each are all certain that their beliefs are the only real truths.

Maybe open your mind to reality once in a while, and think for yourself.

1) no one said they are "certain" of anything. Thats bullshit that you just fabricated.
2) your "religion" is believing in conspiracies against you...
3) your mind is no more "open" than anyone elses. That is really just code for "you need to see things how i see them or you're seeing things wrong".
4) You have pre-determined beliefs that are no likely to change than anyone elses.
5) You say "think for yourself" and all you do is post youtube videos and links.

lol, no, I also dont beleaive what it says.

You truthers are idiots. That is all.

Just passing by ...

the bad news is that cocksucker kerry can't keep a secret, the good news is he got kicked out of bilderberg because of this and i'm next up on the waiting list.

later gaterz!

Seth MacFarlane, the creator of Family Guy, was booked on AA Flight 11 that was crashed into the World Trade Center but missed his flight by ten minutes. Surely he was in on the conspiracy too, right?

that would explain his $50 million hollywood payday a while back.

So let me get this straight, this guy some how was lucky to know all of this was going down and saved his family without helping others... ?

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UvEPi5oMfp...6074351149.jpg

Government: Hi, can I speak to Larry
Larry: yeah, this is Larry
Government: Larry, this is the government calling you. we have something important to tell you, but you have to keep it a secret... promise?
Larry: yes, I prommmmmmmise?
Government: doesn't sound like your promising Larry, say it like you mean it
Larry: OK, I promise
Government: This ain't a joke LARRY, take this shit seriously. we're the government calling you to tell you a damn secret, now fucking swear you won't fucking say anything.
Larry: fine, I PROMISE... fucking christ you guys are a pain
Government: WHAT ASSHOLE?
Larry: no no, not you, I was talking to my cats.
Government: ok, that's what I thought. So we have this secret and now that you promised, you can't tell anyone or act out of the norm. or, we will be mad at you... we won't actually ever do anything, but we'll just glare at you with an evil look.
Larry: ok got it, what the fuck is up?
Government: so we're planning an attack on our own country, but we're going to keep this a secret and only the elite few will know... but we want to use YOUR buildings
Larry: WTF!?!? NO FUCKING WAY! I JUST HAD THEM WASHED!
Government: Look, just take out an insurance claim NOW and you'll walk away a billionaire
Larry: ok, makes sense. so what's going to happen?
Government: just stay out of the area, but don't tell anyone. no one will ever suspect us, it's a brilliant plan... the ones that do will be seen as conspiracy theorists and be laughed at
Larry: why again are you doing this?
Government: For fucks sake LARRY! Do I need to draw this out for you? YOUR insurance company is the same that we use for our company vehicles. They have us by the balls and won't give us another discount for multiple driver discount, so we're really going to stick it to them.
Larry: makes perfect sense!

http://static2.fjcdn.com/comments/qu...c66ebb7f4d.jpg

Do any of you 911 conspiracy tarts even know how much time and planning it takes to bring down a building in a controlled fashion?

It's not something that is done in a few hours. Seriously you guys are morons if you think they set all the explosives up with out anyone noticing in only a few hours.

my promise to you gfyers is to ask the tough questions when i attend the bilderberg retreats. my first question is going to be

why the fuck was john kerry in on this?! are you fucking stupid? that guy blabs like a schoolgirl. erverybody knows that. tighten up people. who the fuck's in charge? what'd we need kerry for?


that is my vow to you.


/

This thread is full of win... and fucking nutters LOL controlled my ass /facepalm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_S...urance_dispute
Insurance dispute[edit source | editbeta]
The insurance policies for World Trade Center buildings 1 WTC, 2 WTC, 4 WTC and 5 WTC had a collective face amount of $3.55 billion. Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Silverstein sought to collect double the face amount (~$7.1 billion) on the basis that the two separate airplane strikes into two separate buildings constituted two occurrences within the meaning of the policies. The insurance companies took the opposite view, and the matter went to court. Based on differences in the definition of "occurrence" (the insurance policy term governing the amount of insurance) and uncertainties over which definition of "occurrence" applied, the court split the insurers into two groups for jury trials on the question of which definition of "occurrence" applied and whether the insurance contracts were subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation or the "two occurrence" interpretation.
The first trial resulted in a verdict on April 29, 2004, that 10 of the insurers in this group were subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation, so their liability was limited to the face value of those policies, and 3 insurers were added to the second trial group.[20][21] The jury was unable to reach a verdict on one insurer, Swiss Reinsurance, at that time, but did so several days later on May 3, 2004, finding that this company was also subject to the "one occurrence" interpretation.[22] Silverstein appealed the Swiss Re decision, but lost that appeal on October 19, 2006.[23] The second trial resulted in a verdict on December 6, 2004, that 9 insurers were subject to the "two occurrences" interpretation and, therefore, liable for a maximum of double the face value of those particular policies ($2.2 billion).[24] The total potential payout, therefore, was capped at $4.577 billion for buildings 1, 2, 4, and 5.[25] An appraisal followed to determine the value of the insured loss.
In July 2006, Silverstein and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey filed a lawsuit against some of its insurers, for refusing to waive requirements of the insurance contracts that Silverstein claimed were necessary to allow renegotiation of the original July 2001 World Trade Center leases. This litigation, was settled together with the federal lawsuits and appraisal, mentioned in the prior paragraph, in a series of settlements announced on May 23, 2007.[26][27][28][29] Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority, for the World Trade Center complex, requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent.[30] He is applying insurance payments toward the redevelopment of the World Trade Center site.[25]

A poll taken by WorldPublicOpinion.org, a collaborative project of research centers in various countries managed by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, College Park, polled 16,063 people in 17 nations outside of the United States during the summer of 2008. They found that majorities in only 9 of the 17 countries believe al-Qaeda carried out the attacks.

46 percent of those surveyed said al-Qaeda was responsible, 15 percent said the U.S. government, 7 percent said Israel and 7 percent said some other perpetrator. One in four people said they did not know who was behind the attacks.

The summary of the poll noted that "Though people with greater education generally have greater exposure to news, those with greater education are only slightly more likely to attribute 9/11 to al Qaeda." Steven Kull, director of WorldPublicOpinion.org, commented "It does not appear that these beliefs can simply be attributed to a lack of exposure to information. "Of those who said the United States was the perpetrator, Kull says many believe it was an attempt to justify an impending U.S. invasion of Iraq.

You do realize building 7 is NOT one of the towers.. Its the building across the street from the towers that was damaged. The way this is making it sound is that building 7 was one of the ones hit by the plane. It was NOT. It was the third building that was taken down and not much about it since it was evacuated and there was no one in it by the time it was pulled.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/pp190104wtc.jpg

if any of them even tried to have a basic layman's knowledge of controlled demolition, then they'd drop their stupid theories. Or they probably wouldn't because they're immune to logic and fact.

Demolishing a building in a controlled fashion takes weeks/months of preparation and execution in a building with unfettered access. It's not done by having ninjas sectretly dropping a few sticks of dynamite behind some desks.

You are correct. It was not hit by a plane.

It suffered a massive earthquake at it's base, and then was hit by millions of tons of falling debris when the towers fell.

No reason for it to fall over at all.

I do think it was a controlled emergency take down. I do not know how it was done exactly but I do not think it would have been tough to take down an already burnt out and extremely damaged building by all reports. I am also guessing it was for the safety of all of those around it if it was going to possibly cause more damage or injury trying to save it.

People conveniently forget that the US created the Taliban and have been caught arming al qaeda in Syria and North Africa.

3000 lives would mean little or nothing to such a government... They prove that war after war.

From a business standpoint it worked out well for Silverstein who was going to be tasked with cleaning up the asbestos in the towers. A massively expensive project.