![]() |
Fukushima Strikes West Coast USA?
The screen shot below was taken on November 28, 2013 at 9:45AM ET. The Two RADCON 5′s are in Richland, Washington and San Francisco, California and the two RADCON 4 Alerts are in San Jose and Fresno California.
|
Richland is the location of Hanford Nuclear Reservation. That's our own mess.
|
|
Quote:
|
They will have to take all those maps down or start feeding them fake data, otherwise there'll be an evacuation :2 cents:
Quote:
|
the end is near
|
And...............
|
we are all fucked
|
Probably nothing to worry about. Both the US and Japanese governments have said it's OK.
|
Don't worry, it can't be worse then the stuff that floats up from Tijuana!
|
Already screwed. Eating anything from Central California, the bread basket of the world, these days is high risk. FDA has already raised "acceptable levels" otherwise the crops would be deemed tainted and inedible by former standards.
:( |
Seems safer on the east coast.
|
try the fish :2 cents: my inner nuke powers my house and 5 house down :1orglaugh :Oh crap
http://www.maniacworld.com/glow-in-the-dark-drummer.jpg |
Quote:
|
Anyone notice a couple months back, after years of hemming and hawing and blahblah, San Onofre was quickly and quietly shut down permanently. I dont know about Hanford but Fukushima and San Onofre wear the General Electric label. Niiiiiiice.
|
Slowest possible revenge for Hiroshima?
|
Quote:
|
So nice, all the kooks assembled in one thread.
Here's one example of who's doing the tracking for the site that produces that map, top notch scientists surely. Not saying there's no radiation spreading from Japan, but consider the source, which of course you won't because well, you're kooks and kooks do what they gotta do to fulfill their kook reality. http://i39.tinypic.com/2vwgu89.jpg |
Quote:
You must have missed that class in high school science class about ocean currents , the effects on weather, evaporation and precipitation, etc. |
I didn't deny that radioactive waste from Fukijima had made it to the west coast of North America, it has, and more will and might become a major problem - my issue was with this map that wehateporn, who believes every story he reads on any conspiracy website on the web, posted. the map 'looks' like an official map from some recognized agency, there are icons indicating radiation levels of RADCON 5 and 4 in Washington state and California - this would be an emergency, the major news outlets would be all over the story. they aren't and neither are govenment agencies, the only other websites linking or publishing to this map are a few conspiracy kook news websites.
All I did was google to find out this map is produced and contributed to by anybody who puts together a home Geiger counter kit. Crowd sourced hysteria which is what the goal is of these people. |
The government and media won't warn you, they need to keep people calm not create a panic. If you can leave the area then I suggest you do :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Couldn't have said it better myself. All kinds of people try to raise alarm bells based on their own non-verified or backed up ideas and spread paranoia-fueled bullshit. Too many fucking idiot bloggers think they are journalists (including a certain dizzy woman out on the west coast who created a stir in the adult community a few years ago). Here is some TRUTH for the whack jobs: Fukushima Fallout is NOT Affecting U.S.-Caught Fish, and lots of Q&A about the disaster: http://newswatch.nationalgeographic....s-caught-fish/ Fukushima water leak: What you should know: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ve-water-leak/ etc... the map posted at the top of this thread is pure bullshit. Sure its easy and scary to read and even I was duped once with another map... just take your time, do your own research, and stop believing the idiots. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Scientific American: http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...from-fukushima http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...clear-disaster Noaa: http://sos.noaa.gov/Datasets/dataset.php?id=332 Nasa: http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/gesNew...ushima-daiichi Are they lying too? |
Quote:
http://www.sfu.ca/archive-pamr/media...bc-shores.html in 2011. http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Rad...888/story.html here is the 'no risk to humans', but with this: http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2162 'EPA to raise "safe" limits' and the most recent article confirming this action from april 2013: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcma...on-guidelines/ After some digging, Mark, i found this: http://enenews.com/california-2500-b...r-tests-canada Simon Fraser University in Canada also tested North American seaweed after Fukushima: ?In samples of dehydrated seaweed taken on March 15 near the North Vancouver SeaBus terminal, the count was zero; on March 22 it was 310 Bq per kilogram; and by March 28 it was 380 Bq/kg.? -Vancouver Sun and the article you can't find via google, but can via links: http://enenews.com/vancouver-seaweed...els-increasing and this is 2012. that's where it stops. no testing for anything beyond march of 2012. they're lying. |
|
Quote:
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc