Only a subsidized mother would post this on her Facebook feed
 

Saw it in my newsfeed today... FUCK!

http://i.imgur.com/A1N3dTv.jpg

our plan is working perfectly

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...8SpFLsVBacg06g

guess the race :2 cents:

As long as governments pay baby bonus it is true. Having kids especially multiples is almost a business.

:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I was once in a grocery store standing in line at the checkout counter with two women behind me. One of them had a kid that was likely about 5-years-old and she was pregnant. They were talking about doing something, I can't remember what now. The pregnant one said to the other, "I will have to wait until the baby comes then I get a raise." After a few questions she explained to her friend that she gets more welfare for having two kids. She actually referred to it as her "raise" and "paycheck" a few different times.

and ? do you think that was the main reason that she will have second kid ?:winkwink::winkwink:

Poor kiddo ....

I've heard several variations of that same conversation in the past few years with different welfare people on the street.

It just blows my mind - the mentality of these people.

Just like the t-shirt says..."I have to go to work. Millions on welfare depend on me."

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

The way I read it, seems to be:
"mom + me = $$$ (good/awesome things in general)".

Similar to when people say "you're so money" or some other slang phrase.

But yeah, if the mother meant it to be taken literally, that's very poor form.

I've never heard anyone say that to someone else.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

This is some pure bullshit.
To raise kids cost a LOT of money.
Here is way over 2000$ only for kids-garden and nanny for my kids.

you've never seen the movie swingers i assume. either way, i doubt it was meant in this way.

not good idea for sure!

I think my sarcasm was wasted on a couple of you :)

:2 cents::2 cents::1orglaugh

That's some seriously fucked up shit, but it happens more often than we would like to admit. I don't see how "getting a kid" gets you a raise - it's fucking expensive to raise a kid. And when the kids get much older it gets much more expensive.

My brother did something similar recently. He was unemployed and collecting his unemployment check. His gf - who might as well be his wife at this point - has a good job handing a tech department at a small non profit. They cut back on expenses, got a check every month, no problem. The checks just stopped and surprise, he quickly found a job.

Another friend has two boys and a girl. He lost his job and discovered unemployment, then welfare, and god only knows what else. He discovered the four of them on welfare with green stamps and various other programs including section eight and he's better off than working.

We need to limit all of this. Welfare (and even unemployment) should be a short term temporary assistance, not a way of life. If you are a parent and after six months cannot support yourself and your children, your children should go to foster care.

I think this is being a bit harsh. I work but also have two kids and receive child benefit for both.
If I am discussing it with (my wife for example) I am likely to say "We will get our payment on friday" and "now you have dropped a few hours we should be able to get more money".

Not that different from raise and paycheck is it?

the government is investing in the future, some of those people will actually become productive taxpaying citizens:2 cents:

Maybe the father bought the bib to tease mom.

But people will read into it whatever they want.

:):):):):):):):):)

Single moms are the new heroes of America. Obama says so.

I guess I always just associated paycheck as money you received for work done and the term raise as something you earned by improving yourself and or situation.

To me she got an increase to her check not a pay raise. I know it is just words, but it is how I guess I interpret it.

I'm not judging her (well maybe a little bit). I don't know her or much about her other than those few words I heard while in line. What I do know is that she had one kid that she wasn't able to afford to raise without assistance (shit happens, I understand that), and yet she still decided to have another. To me that is very irresponsible.

i bet some billionaire feelings are hurt

Yes. Second, third, fourth, fifth and more. Baby bonuses, more benefits with more kids, easier to keep getting benefits without a job... it happens all the time...

http://i1203.photobucket.com/albums/...-SingleMom.jpg

(dear gfy crybabies, ASSHOLES......(Larry?) this image was shown to me by a WHITE woman with TWO KIDS by DIFFERNT BLACK MEN that is .... well .... you guessed it A SINGLE MON)

yes but this shouldn't bother you at all, these are the people you are so concerned about voting and making 20 bucks an hour a taco bell :2 cents:

Obama is the man :thumbsup

I have never suggested that people should make $20 per hour for working at a fast food place. just because I don't agree with how she is living her life doesn't mean I think she shouldn't be allowed to vote.

I've heard the phrase "That's so money" but it doesn't relate to the bullshit that mother has posted about.

I don't get how welfare is so fucking funny to some of these people. Clearly that bitch has no shame.

don't laugh dogg :2 cents:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :thumbsup

i agree.
I have three kids, i receive tax deductions for them.
I think it is a good thing.
We also receive money each month for each kid. about 100 each. I put it into their Education Savings plan. It alone will pay for about 1.5-2 years of their University.

In korea having three kids gets us many discounts. Half price parking.
We also get a nanny several times per week. School is a bit cheaper etc

I realize this is different than some people getting welfare checks.
However i think the money is still well spent, the parents suck, but the kids are not at fault.