BaDoink do a reverse playboy to sell porn
 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasperha...or-journalism/

BaDoink.com write news free and use sexy pics to upsell to the porn. Its a porn site, that looks like a news site thing.

Censored news/mag site with links to porn VOD:

http://www.badoinkcash.com/

I am unsure how many people care to news and mag articles in first place, since there's marked leaders for this.

What if gizmodo, engadget etc. had adverts landing on porn VOD?... except the fact gizmodo and engadget would be associated with porn, quite a brand damage (up to being sued by parents), these ads to porn it would pay back less than the mainstream ads that gizmodo, engadget can get, and that porn site can't, just because brand can't pollute themselves with ads on porn sites.

An inverse discussion it was about a food delivery company that advertised in pornhub, they reported it was cheaper than mainstream ads, but giving good enough results - no matter the name of food company being associated with porn, guess MacDonalds can't advertise on porhub or it would make headlines.

An interesting point it is, that really porn it is no more taboo, it is mainstream esp. for younger people (who will be "everyone" after some years), also the mainstream movies are often plain porn like Don Jon, Nymphomaniac, Blue is the Warmest Colour, and so on:

"Sex at the movies: Hollywood seems in the mood again":
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/m...shame/8022835/

Still, what it matters for businesses, affiliates etc. really it is: the mainstream brands will not advertise on porn sites, and porn sites are visited for the porn and not for the censored articles, so what we do with this?

Seems like a viable idea to me.

It could be, but if doing well, then many others should do the same. Until now that's just badoink?