The scandal of fiddled global warming data
 

The US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/env...ming-data.html

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/...stevengoddard/

"When future generations try to understand how the world got carried away around the end of the 20th century by the panic over global warming, few things will amaze them more than the part played in stoking up the scare by the fiddling of official temperature data. There was already much evidence of this seven years ago, when I was writing my history of the scare, The Real Global Warming Disaster. But now another damning example has been uncovered by Steven Goddard?s US blog Real Science, showing how shamelessly manipulated has been one of the world?s most influential climate records, the graph of US surface temperature records published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Goddard shows how, in recent years, NOAA?s US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been ?adjusting? its record by replacing real temperatures with data ?fabricated? by computer models. The effect of this has been to downgrade earlier temperatures and to exaggerate those from recent decades, to give the impression that the Earth has been warming up much more than is justified by the actual data. In several posts headed ?Data tampering at USHCN/GISS?, Goddard compares the currently published temperature graphs with those based only on temperatures measured at the time. These show that the US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record; whereas the latest graph, nearly half of it based on ?fabricated? data, shows it to have been warming at a rate equivalent to more than 3 degrees centigrade per century.

When I first began examining the global-warming scare, I found nothing more puzzling than the way officially approved scientists kept on being shown to have finagled their data, as in that ludicrous ?hockey stick? graph, pretending to prove that the world had suddenly become much hotter than at any time in 1,000 years. Any theory needing to rely so consistently on fudging the evidence, I concluded, must be looked on not as science at all, but as simply a rather alarming case study in the aberrations of group psychology. "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/env...ming-data.html

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/...stevengoddard/

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/06/prweb11949905.htm

Keating is so sure of his claim that he has issued two challenges to the deniers, one that will pay $10,000 to anyone that can prove, via the scientific method that man made climate change is not real; and one that will pay $1000 to anyone that can provide any scientific evidence at all that it isn’t real. The challenge is open to anyone over 18 and there is no entry fee. “I will judge all entries and show why they fail or succeed in the challenge. Entries don’t even have to be original. They just have to be first.”

now's ur chance!

I'll offer Keating the money for him to prove Global Warming exists, I know my money is safe :)

Seems hotter outside to me.

Perhaps your jacket is warmer than the one you used to wear :2 cents:

http://www.skepticalscience.com/glob...ng-on-mars.htm

however, your money was safe.. you just have a chance to get 10k more!

Yeah, that was right around nukes and hairspray.

Who knows the truth but we still should have some clean air and maybe some clean water. Sounds fair enough and if it helps the climate it's a win/win.

I doubt that guy would pay up :2 cents:

They just want taxes, they don't really care about the climate :2 cents:

Good point, I think they need to tax polluters not us for this.