proof of global warming
 

2006 eh?

All the scientists of the world say Climate Change, Porn forum says no......

Except for the guy in charge of research, who said that there as not been any real change in climate in over 17 years

http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/05/...ears-9-months/

Not all scientists, just more misinformation from you... or should I say more Hot Air?

Yeah it is cool that this one guy who retired can keep saying this stuff. The rest of the world who gets nothing out of being biased are on one side.

A guy with an English accent said it so it must be true.

You're just going to keep getting it wrong when you don't read the proof that is linked to it, but then again, your belief is based like that, isn't it? Based on half assed 3rd party bong parties?

What about the Maldive's being overrun by the rising sea levels caused by the melting of the polar ice caps?

I'd recommend watching this documentary before getting back to me on this one.
http://i.imgur.com/yCxnmVtl.jpg

Polar Ice Caps
http://i.imgur.com/iXzHexC.jpg


BUT if you looked at the science you would see that local climate temperatures will actually be cooler, so as is stated in your little cartoon "near record cold and wet summer" means it would be perfectly consistent with the expected result of global warming.

Finally, and most importantly when it comes to any scientific venture - having some part of your science proven wrong does not mean the entirety of the science is wrong. Perhaps an inconvenient truth got some facts wrong, but we were still new at looking into this data, and we didn't have as much as we have now. I am sure that even scientist who state climate change is real will admit inconvenient truth got some things wrong.

how to travel to 18th century?

Hey, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Seems like thats your logic.

yeah tits save the planet

I added this to my list in Netflix. I've been following Maldives for a few years now and I wonder what they are going to do.

2006 looks like child's underwear judging by the height of it in comparison to 1990 and others.

While we're at it, do you also believe in your quote about privacy in your sig? Or are you just another troll?

It's not even debatable anymore.

Records have been kept for 150 years now and anyone who denies climate change is real is pretty much considered a quack at this point in the scientific community lol

Glad I'm not the only one.

Any chance you like Mother of Pearl by Roxy Music?

Before you go any further think about who the quote is from.

So its settled science?

Why do we spend billions of dollars every year on it then?

Vendzilla, your graph and information are incomplete. You can't look at such a short timespan and come to the conclusion that everything is fine. You need to look at a longer history with more data.

According to NOAA:
http://www.climate.gov/sites/default...?itok=tCps1K4T

http://www.climate.gov/news-features...ng-past-decade

And according to Nasa : "The world is getting warmer. Whether the cause is human activity or natural variability?and the preponderance of evidence says it?s humans?thermometer readings all around the world have risen steadily since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution."

Go to Nasa's Earth Observatory at http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea...ecadaltemp.php and then click on "Show All" to see a history of earth temperature.

Only the USA debates it at all. It is settled. China is making a deal with Russia to ship the northern route. This wasn't even possible before. Greenland has lots of new land to mine since the glaciers are melting. The world is changing and people are making money off of it, and you are wondering if it is real. Get the blinders off.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ide_400kyr.png

Thats has to be the most asinine statement yet!

Where do you get your information from?

In about 2 seconds of Googling I can find numerous example of countries still debating it.
Heres one great example:
http://www.theguardian.com/environme...ead-in-english

In Australia we have the AUSTRALIAN BUREAU OF METEOROLOGY ACCUSED OF CRIMINALLY ADJUSTED GLOBAL WARMING

And heres Winnipeg. Last I checked that was not in the US
Climate change skeptics may be confusing climate and weather

To be clear I believe there is Climate Change but its a naturally occurring cycle.

The problem with you is you want to have it both ways. To you "Global Warming" and "Climate Change" are interchangeable terms.

It's actually "climate change", that is also more accurate term when concerning big puzzles like climate (and time span being 50-200 years). But the pic suits for the theme as oceans have been warming. It's like predicting the weather 100 years from now: there will all kind of weathers between that point and now, and also shitload of differents factors those can change.

Why only go back to 1880? Go back even further:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Variations.png

Current temperature is nothing out of the ordinary and is in fact lower than it has been for much of the Holocene.

All of this bullshit is much ado about nothing. It's just a convenient way for all of the self-righteous hand wringers and guilt trippers to inflate their sense of self importance.



.

What they are going to do is keep extorting money from all of the gullible greentards from the west so they can build more new airports, resorts and other developments on their supposedly sinking islands. Do you think they would be doing all of that if they honestly felt they were about to be swallowed by the sea?

Too bad that it's not about current temperature.

What's it about then? Future temperature? These clowns can't even get short term forecasts right and you expect us to believe their forecasts for 100 years from now?



.

Yes, it is about future temperature amongst other things. Or most accurately it's about what kind of impacts will human made/ induced carbon emmissions have in the terms of volume and time. So it's not just about temperature.

And it's not about forecasts. Forecasts are made to estimate the impacts mentioned earlier. Concentrating to forecasts is like focusing to Google analytics, instead of what it is supposed to examine and show (visitors and visitors behaviour). Even if you think that Analytics is bullshit, it doesn't meant that your site wouldn't have visitors.

I suppose you are implying that Barack Obama has the most to hide of us all? I can't possibly know your thoughts on the president as I cannot read your mind. Satire does not come across well through the internet.

The guardian article is about how only idiots debate it. Thanks for proving my point hahahah.

Believe what you want but an understanding of science and facts is helpful to have true reasoning.

The interesting thing is that graph shows something going on. We are moving out of the range we were in for the last 2k years. We could move towards an extreme we haven't experienced in a long time and encounter problems.

It doesn't matter how they're debating it. You said it was only in the US, proving my point nicely.

And as usual if anyone should disagree with your point of view they must be idiots. Scientist or not.

He said it. If you can't see the irony I can't help you.

Yeah, you win. Hahahah

Even if climate change is not happening, we still need to change our ways.

Studies have been done, in the US for example a small town near some sort of factory. Its pumping out mercury. The women in the town were tested, and had something like 10 or 20 times the mercury other women have in their system.

Either way, what we are doing is not working. Its all for money..

All of this dumbass arguing over a kinda funny pic that grapesoda posted. lol