Latest Science: Autism Caused by Aborted Fetal Cells in Vaccines
 

Just been published in the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology

http://www.ms.academicjournals.org/a...%20et%20al.pdf

"Thus, rising autistic disorder prevalence is directly related to vaccines manufactured utilizing human fetal cells. Increased paternal age and DSM revisions were not related to rising autistic disorder prevalence."

I would hate to be your child.

Also, no one cares.

Dipshit, aaaaaaaagain.

Of the many lies told by anti-vaccination advocates, this is one of the worst, because it hits on a real moral issue. However, anyone with a modicum of training in biology will tell you that it is impossible for vaccines (or any other injected medicine) to contain human tissue. The reason is simple: if you are injected with anything containing tissue from another person, your body will immediately recognize it as an invader and begin attacking it. This immune response is often quite radical and can easily lead to death! This is why blood from a donor to a recipient must be carefully matched before the recipient can receive it. Thus, there is no human tissue of any kind in vaccines. Unfortunately, the anti-vaccination movement (and even some naive pro- life groups) will try to convince the uninformed that vaccines contain tissue from aborted babies and that abortions must be continually done to supply this tissue to the "evil" drug companies. This is, of course, a bald-faced lie. Unfortunately, this lie is particularly evil, in that it targets a person's morally correct view that abortion is murder.

For any lie to be successful, there must be a grain of truth in it. This lie is no exception. There is a tangential connection between some vaccines and abortion. The Hepatitis A vaccine, the MMR vaccine, and the chicken pox vaccine all contain viruses (weakened or inactivated) that were grown in human cells. A virus must be given a medium in which to propagate. Many vaccines use viruses that can propagate in several kinds of mammal cells, but some viruses are so specific that they can only propagate in human cells. The viruses used in the above-listed vaccines are that specific. Thus, they must be grown in human cells.

Where do the vaccine companies get the cells for these vaccines? They get them from companies like Coriell Cell Repositories, 403 Haddon Avenu, Camden, New Jersey 08103, 800-752-3805. This company has many cell lines, which are cultures of self-perpetuating cells. Each culture of cells is continually reproducing, making more cells. Those cells are sold to researchers, drug companies, and other medical technology firms. The specific cell lines used in vaccines are the MRC-5 and WI-38 cell lines1, and they have been supplying medical research of all types for more than 35 years. Where do these cell lines come from? That's where the grain of truth in this lie comes from. Both of these cell lines were cultured from cells taken from two abortions, one (MRC-5) that was performed in September,1966 and one (WI-38) that was performed in July, 1962.


http://www.drwile.com/lnkpages/render.asp?vac_abortion

references:

1. Merck and Co, VAQTA (Hepatitis A), M-M-R-II, VARIVAX product inserts 908-423-1000; GLAXO Smithkline Heptatitis A vaccine product insert, 888-825-5249 Return to Text

2. Coriell Cell Repositories - Product AG05965 Return to Text

3. Coriell Cell Repositories - Product AG06814 Return to Text

4. Public Law 103-43; June 10, 1993, National Institutes Of Health Revitalization Act Of 1993, Title I - General Provisions Regarding Title IV Of Public Health Service Act, Part G, Sec. 498A: c-4 Return to Text

5. Public Law 103-43; June 10, 1993, National Institutes Of Health Revitalization Act Of 1993, Title I - General Provisions Regarding Title IV Of Public Health Service Act, Part G, Sec. 498B: a Return to Text

6. http://www.cogforlife.org/vaticanrelease.htm Return to Text

7. http://www.immunize.org/concerns/vaticandocument.htm Return to Text

8. http://www.catholicnews.com/data/sto...ns/0504240.htm Return to Text

I really don't think that autism is caused by vaccines.

I have a similar, but not the same disorder, and I'm almost certain that I was like this before I was born. Just doesn't seem like something that vaccination would cause.

I like debating

I don't. it exposes me to other people's opinions :1orglaugh

what is with all this bullshit? Arent there conspiracy whackjob forums on which whackjobs discuss conspiracies? And vaccine bullshit forums on which idiots with no understanding of basic science can gibber and point? Shouldnt you be there, rather than here?

You don't like science?

There are different types of Autism, some shouldn't even have the same name, it's a spectrum, what you have won't be from vaccines as otherwise you wouldn't be writing here. Vaccine-Autism is regressive, a perfectly normal child regresses into Autism, they are their dependent on Mom and Dad for life.

You wouldn't have minded if the science agreed with your opinion

You're actually trying to deny that there's some aborted fetal cellular debris in vaccines? Sorry, that's not something that's actually up for debate, it's something which is 100% admitted by the both sides, and no this wasn't be raised as a moral issue on this occasion, it was being raised as a science issue, a new study has found it's causing Autism, that is simply not acceptable.

Are you only interested in the science that backs up your own opinion, this is science, but since you don't like the result you attack it, next time you should take a more scientific approach and consider the study, research further. It seems you only believe what you want to believe.

That's the spirit :thumbsup

You dont debate anything.

Your mind is made up everytime.

You have the same opinion about everything.

You are extremely predictable and very very boring.

Unfortunately some of the shite you spout borders on dangerous. Like this anti vaccination bullshit.

Another one of your funny if not slightly dangerous pearls was drinking orange juice to cure Ebola.

I presume you passed that on to the brave people on the ground in Africa who are desperately trying to save lives and contain the outbreak, right ? I bet they have that nasty business all sorted now that you have told them where they are going wrong ?

Right ?

I posted some new science which doesn't fit in with a number of poster's existing opinions so they wrote it off, they didn't want to consider the new scientific findings as it would mean having to admit they've been wrong for the last 10 years :2 cents: