GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why is there less variation in humans than other species? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1152365)

Mutt 10-18-2014 03:51 PM

Why is there less variation in humans than other species?
 
There are dogs that are tiny weighing 6 pounds fully grown and there are dogs that are monsters weighing 200 pounds, and they're appearance varies wildly between breeds. Why don't humans vary as much? I guess there are other species that don't vary much either - every dolphin I've ever seen is a dead ringer for the next one, primates don't vary much.

MiamiBoyz 10-18-2014 04:07 PM

Those extremes in dogs are the results of 100's of generations of selective breeding of the traits by human intervention to create the variations you see today.

It's basic genetics...learn about it.

Arnox 10-18-2014 04:08 PM

Humans haven't been selectively bred for certain characteristics, dogs have.

All the breed of dogs are a result of human intervention: Pugs would have been standard wolf-like creatures 50,000 years ago. By a process of artificial selection, humans have created 'designer' dogs that look a certain way.

Struggle4Bucks 10-18-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 20258394)
Why don't humans vary as much?

Wait till we all drop our pants. I'm sure we see some variety hidden there...:upsidedow

Mutt 10-18-2014 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz (Post 20258399)
Those extremes in dogs are the results of 100's of generations of selective breeding of the traits by human intervention to create the variations you see today.

It's basic genetics...learn about it.

Humans have been travelling the world and interbreeding since humans walked out of Africa.

Mutt 10-18-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks (Post 20258402)
Wait till we all drop our pants. I'm sure we see some variety hidden there...:upsidedow

No not really, if you look at any studies of human penis size the majority fall within a couple of inches - we see huge black dicks in porn because ........ it's porn and nobody wants to see a black guy in porn with a 6" dick.

mineistaken 10-18-2014 04:44 PM

What about same question regarding moose? Giraffes?

pornmasta 10-18-2014 05:17 PM

http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/paterso...ge-300x300.jpg

ottopottomouse 10-18-2014 05:18 PM

Most dogs have lived their entire life and died in less time than it takes a human to be ready to start breeding.

CaptainHowdy 10-18-2014 05:22 PM

Are you asking seriously?? Dogs are a product of eugenics.

Jel 10-18-2014 06:00 PM

all humans look the same? is this a dig at the chinese?

Mutt 10-18-2014 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 20258473)
all humans look the same? is this a dig at the chinese?

it's a dig at all of us - height and weight there's not a big variation in humans, and there are really only a handful of different looking 'races' - caucasian, black, asian the three most different from each other. i think the term the geneticists use is 'phenotype'.

Mutt 10-18-2014 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20258419)
What about same question regarding moose? Giraffes?

This is true - now that I think of it, the dog seems to have the most variations of any animal. You don't see anywhere near the differences in domestic cats - imagine a 200 pound domestic cat.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-PM9ad46vq5...r+recorded.jpg

http://www.dogbreed4u.com/sites/dogb...g-breeds_0.jpg

Why so much more selective breeding of dogs versus other animals?

420 10-18-2014 07:13 PM



dicknipples 10-18-2014 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 20258473)
all humans look the same? is this a dig at the chinese?

What's funny about this is we think all Asians look the same, and all Asians think whites look the same, and vice versa for blacks.

Si 10-18-2014 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 20258488)
it's a dig at all of us - height and weight there's not a big variation in humans, and there are really only a handful of different looking 'races' - caucasian, black, asian the three most different from each other. i think the term the geneticists use is 'phenotype'.

Height - Pretty sure the smallest human is about 3 foot, and the tallest is over 7. Just guestimating. I'm talking "fully grown adult".

Weight - No idea who is the lightest and heaviest..... But I bet there is at least a 200lb swing between the 2.

Race? if we wanted to to uber racist in our human society I bet we could come up with more than standard 3 that seem to be peddled. (Caucasian, Mogoloid, Negro.) There are "sub" races here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...b11_s0476a.jpg What about if we looked at ancestry and then chose race and called that a breed?

What about Monkeys? The smallest fit in the palm of you hand, the largest would bite your hand off.

Jel 10-18-2014 08:03 PM

don't forget with humans you can also classify by male/female

American Psycho 10-18-2014 08:03 PM

I own a liger.

Jel 10-18-2014 08:07 PM

also, you're forgetting that sure, with dogs you have eg alsation, labrador, pitbull, mastiff, rottweiler, and so on. But with humans you have eg larry, joe, danny, mark, peter, paul, lionel, brian, carl, robin - and MANY more besides :2 cents:

Best-In-BC 10-18-2014 08:08 PM

You gotta be retarded thinking humans don't have the widest variation of looks on the planet.

Jel 10-18-2014 08:12 PM

Alexander
Ignacio
Jon
Dexter
Jacob
Jimmy
Kim
Karl
Roger
Brendan
Ben
Merle
Bob
Santiago
Ramon
Milton
Jessie
Malcolm
Ismael

I could go on.

420 10-18-2014 08:14 PM

http://humanorigins.si.edu/sites/def..._landscape.jpg

Dogs probably don't notice that many differences in other dogs. They like to choose their mates by scent more than sight.

Jel 10-18-2014 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 420 (Post 20258516)
Dogs probably don't notice that many differences in other dogs. They like to choose their mates by scent more than sight.

I'm glad you asked:

Don
Jean
Dwayne
Emmett
Tommie
Nicholas
Marlon
Ron
Lloyd
Allan
Gerald
Kirk
Calvin
Homer
Drew
Rickey
Dustin
Fernando
Johnny
Jimmie
Boyd
Lowell
Preston
Jermaine
Terence
Earnest
Alfred
Felipe
Otis
Taylor
Emanuel
Stephen
Roland
Dan
Clyde
Jerry
Marvin
Matt
Christopher
Victor
James
Frankie
Elmer
Nick
Rogelio
Kelvin
Donnie
Saul
Shannon
Carl
Cornelius
Kenneth
Sammy

Mutt 10-18-2014 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 420 (Post 20258492)


ha - i just saw the dancing otter gif on a sports forum and loved it, had no idea where it came from.

420 10-18-2014 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 20258517)
I'm glad you asked:

Don
Jean
Dwayne
Emmett
Tommie
Nicholas
Marlon
Ron
Lloyd
Allan
Gerald
Kirk
Calvin
Homer
Drew
Rickey
Dustin
Fernando
Johnny
Jimmie
Boyd
Lowell
Preston
Jermaine
Terence
Earnest
Alfred
Felipe
Otis
Taylor
Emanuel
Stephen
Roland
Dan
Clyde
Jerry
Marvin
Matt
Christopher
Victor
James
Frankie
Elmer
Nick
Rogelio
Kelvin
Donnie
Saul
Shannon
Carl
Cornelius
Kenneth
Sammy

moar

have luck!
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-N...58/courage.jpg

Hentaikid 10-19-2014 12:59 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmFKd1ZAAxM

But actually it's true, humans have little genetic variation, there's a hypothesis that there was a near-extinction event in the distant past and human population was reduced to about 2000 individuals. So two chimps from the same jungle have more genetic variation than a Swede and a Mongolian

NatalieK 10-19-2014 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 420 (Post 20258516)
http://humanorigins.si.edu/sites/def..._landscape.jpg

Dogs probably don't notice that many differences in other dogs. They like to choose their mates by scent more than sight.

this is what we was thinking, many species look similar, tell a mallard from another or a lion from another, (although, realising, lions are another breed of cat or mallard a bird.) maybe a Koala or crocodiles, dogs do vary in breeds, similar to races with colour height & size. Also a big difference in humans, the way we act, or react :2 cents:

carpocratian 10-19-2014 05:24 AM

Go back 100,000 years ago (or possibly less), and there were several co-existing species of human.

Jel 10-19-2014 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 420 (Post 20258523)

:1orglaugh :thumbsup

Anton
Foster
Morton
Stephan
Antoine
Nolan
Raymundo
Bertram
Hunter
Leonardo
Rayford
Duncan
Jere
Logan
Jarrod
Lazaro
Ashley
Xavier
Isreal
Jamey
Walker
Reid
Kip
Britt
Gayle
Johnathon
Johnson
Monty
Chi
Waylon
Lane
Chas
Daren
Weston
Dong
Val
Jamar
Mary
Nicky
Mitch
Gail
Chuck
Emerson
Gale
Dominique
Wes
Chadwick
Rosario
Edison
Neville
Maynard
Lenard
Kennith
Adolph
Darron
Emory
Aldo
Gaston
Moshe
Felton
Titus
Bryon
Hal
Eloy
Minh
Rich
Filiberto
Garret
Carmelo
Oswaldo
Tyson
Carson
Jame
Gaylord
Ike
Toney
Carter
Robby
Vern
Cordell
Collin
Richie
Jeffry
Junior
Isaias
Trenton
Brendon
Robt
Hosea
Vance
Kraig
Dudley
Freeman
Deandre
Dylan
Claudio
Russ
Wilton

rogueteens 10-19-2014 06:20 AM

Actually, its a bit of a mystery as to why dogs have so many breeds! yes, they are created by humans but in theory, we shouldn't have been so successful in doing so.

seeandsee 10-19-2014 02:52 PM

i guess dog god put some magic into it :)

NatalieK 10-19-2014 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens (Post 20258736)
Actually, its a bit of a mystery as to why dogs have so many breeds! yes, they are created by humans but in theory, we shouldn't have been so successful in doing so.

It isn't a a big thing, think carefully, how much variation in breed!

You have Damian & divvy, 2 obvious individuals, one has nothing, he follows the other around like a lap dog. Catching onto negativity. Then there is the obvious winner, the playboy, the business man, the worker, the go getter, the maker. Some maybe not so obvious, but still working, and the follow on, the relaxed affiliate that makes his work & due money from making life like a retriever, by seeing what people want & get.

we're all the same, dogs, humans, we're all animals at heart, what one are you? :thumbsup

pornmasta 10-19-2014 04:09 PM

dogs aren't racists, humans are

blinki bill 10-19-2014 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens (Post 20258736)
Actually, its a bit of a mystery as to why dogs have so many breeds! yes, they are created by humans but in theory, we shouldn't have been so successful in doing so.

Not that much of a mystery, selective breeding can produce very big difference in appearance, yet small in terms of genetic diversity; Dogs have big differences in how they look, size etc but not that big of a genetic diversity.

With selective breeding you can produce a lot bigger diversity than nature ever will, in natural selection anything that doesn't work well dies off so only the breeds that are best in adapting and surviving go on (basic evolution)

So basically there is the answer nature does not crate such big diversity as selective breeding

I am sure if some advance aliens drop on our planet and make us their pets, there could be much bigger diversity in humans too as they won't be satisfied with so few breeds

duk75 10-19-2014 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 20259101)
dogs aren't racists, humans are

Good one. :thumbsup

I actually hate people think humans have races.

I thought that the beat thing that the nazi's could make to the humanity was to create (accidentally) an immense hate against racism. But today many people still takes the racist discourse in a positive way.

The progressive idea is to forget about skin colour and love the "sameness". The retrograde way is to "recognize" the "speciality" of each skin colour and love the "difference".

This also happens with feminists, some of them are crazy enough to defend the "difference" between men and women, and protect the women of being "man"-ized or "male"-ized, arguing that there is "something special" in being a woman, which is of course special because men have not that.

But this kind of discourse, which celebrates "differences" only takes to segregation and inputs the thought of discrimination in every individual that gets convinced by it. "Oh, I am a female and therefore I should have different rights, as I have different needs and capacities than a male"... "We should have different laws too, and a different murder called 'feminicide', because killing a woman is not like killing a man"... And with this ideology, they start to segregate women and men; in some countries there are zones in the trains and buses where is forbidden for men to get in, a segregation justified with the discourse of "difference", and explained saying that men are too aggressive and bad that they cannot be on the same wagon where is a woman. An idea that is so stupid and with terrible consequences, in the same manner that male exclusive and female exclusive schools are hazardous too: in the end, the separation of them does not allow them to learn to live together, with each other, instead, the women and men of the train never learn to behave properly to each other, and the schoolgirls and schoolboys get very disappointed when they do not get the treatment they expect from an individual of the opposite sex.

The same may happen with the "love" of the "difference" with the so called "races". A woman might be worried about being with someone of another "race", thinking about stupid racial frivolities, which could in the end lead to the rejection of some man because he is not of her race or he is not pure enough, or he is this or that...

Not to say that also there are plenty of humans, I bet more than 50%, that could not be classified under the unscientific idea of race.

blackmonsters 10-19-2014 06:18 PM

As if humans didn't try to kill all the different humans since the beginning of time; thus eliminating different types of humans.

What a dumb fucking question.


.

NewOldPlayer 10-19-2014 09:56 PM

Variations in species only exists to those species that can recognize it.

A snake has no idea what type of frog it is about to eat, but only knows it is a frog.

A butterfly has no idea what type of flower it is eating from, only that it is colorful and has nectar.

RummyBoy 10-19-2014 10:18 PM

Well our species are ethnicities.

ottopottomouse 10-20-2014 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 20259101)
dogs aren't racists, humans are

A lot of dogs don't like black people although I don't know if they are scared of them by physical appearance or what the reason for aggression is.

Mutt 10-20-2014 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse (Post 20259518)
A lot of dogs don't like black people although I don't know if they are scared of them by physical appearance or what the reason for aggression is.

We had a dog who barked at black people seemingly way more than at white people - I wish some psychology department at a university would do a good study to see if it's true or just something people are imagining or exaggerating about. They do so many useless studies, at least this one would interest a huge audience.

HollywoodRevenue 10-20-2014 05:41 AM

every human is different size color shape weight ...some work all day..some sleep all day..some are highly intelligent some are idiots...some are nice ..some are mean some love water some love land..some fly some live underground.

PR_Glen 10-20-2014 05:48 AM

Drinking and science don't go hand in hand I guess? Selective breeding for hundreds of years vs civilization (non selective breeding over the course of thousands of years)


Quote:

Originally Posted by Best-In-BC (Post 20258511)
You gotta be retarded thinking humans don't have the widest variation of looks on the planet.

We are almost all genetically identical, our variations are almost non existent compared to any range of species. How is it possible you are wrong this often? Seriously..

PR_Glen 10-20-2014 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20259200)
As if humans didn't try to kill all the different humans since the beginning of time; thus eliminating different types of humans.

What a dumb fucking question.


.

yes, because everyone knows war has a larger impact than breeding does.. wait...

blackmonsters 10-20-2014 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 20259629)
yes, because everyone knows war has a larger impact than breeding does.. wait...

You're an idiot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history

:2 cents:

_Richard_ 10-20-2014 08:13 AM

my god.

8char

rogueteens 10-20-2014 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blinki bill (Post 20259111)
Not that much of a mystery, selective breeding can produce very big difference in appearance, yet small in terms of genetic diversity; Dogs have big differences in how they look, size etc but not that big of a genetic diversity.

With selective breeding you can produce a lot bigger diversity than nature ever will, in natural selection anything that doesn't work well dies off so only the breeds that are best in adapting and surviving go on (basic evolution)

So basically there is the answer nature does not crate such big diversity as selective breeding

I wasn't talking about nature but selective breeding, science cannot explain why dogs produce such amazing variety and that is a fact. look at cats, they get subjected to just as much selective breeding but only really have hair variations. No other creature that mankind has breed (reindeer, cows, pigs, etc ..) can come anywhere near as close to the diversity of dogs.

Barry-xlovecam 10-20-2014 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 20259200)
As if humans didn't try to kill all the different humans since the beginning of time; thus eliminating different types of humans.

What a dumb fucking question.


.

Good point

_Richard_ 10-20-2014 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens (Post 20259995)
I wasn't talking about nature but selective breeding, science cannot explain why dogs produce such amazing variety and that is a fact. look at cats, they get subjected to just as much selective breeding but only really have hair variations. No other creature that mankind has breed (reindeer, cows, pigs, etc ..) can come anywhere near as close to the diversity of dogs.

what do you base this 'hair variations' opinion on?

blackmonsters 10-20-2014 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 20259610)
We had a dog who barked at black people seemingly way more than at white people - I wish some psychology department at a university would do a good study to see if it's true or just something people are imagining or exaggerating about. They do so many useless studies, at least this one would interest a huge audience.

Actually it's very simple.
Dogs react to their owners and when the owner becomes tense the dog senses that and becomes protective.
It's not about the dog; it's about how the owner of the dog reacts to blacks.
The dog becomes trained of the threat by sensing the owner's reaction to the presence of the threat.

:2 cents:

But we could be even more simple and note that you whine enough about blacks that this
behavior would be expected of your dog.

Quit blaming the fucking dog; dog.

:2 cents:

Hentaikid 10-21-2014 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens (Post 20259995)
science cannot explain why dogs produce such amazing variety and that is a fact.

Considering evolution says every mammal on the planet evolved from something like a jurassic vole, I'm not sure where you're getting this notion from.

Humans aren't being bred for traits so children tend to revert to the mean, NBA player marries a normal sized gal, their kids aren't quite so tall. Steven Hawking marries his nurse, the kids aren't so bright.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123