![]() |
Client ignored payment requests for 6 months so I posted bill on their facebook page
Just wondering if I opened myself up to any legal action because of that and our stupid privacy laws in Canada. It was just a bill for under $70 for website hosting and some minor website changes for a site I developed for them.
The people let their domain name expire by accident, then decided not to bother with the site at all any more. They still owed me $67.80 for past work so I sent them a bill. Of course since they no longer had a website there was no need in their mind for them to pay me since I had no recourse (I couldn't shut their site off since they no longer had one) I got sick of not getting a response (original invoice was dated April 28, 2014) so I posted a message asking them if they could please pay their bill along with a copy of the invoice on their facebook wall. Honestly I don't think the message even showed up as I couldn't see it on there. I thought maybe they had it set so they had to approve any messages before they appeared on their wall. I could be wrong though. Anyway, it worked. I got my cheque along with a message that says: "I apologize for not getting this done but having said that I did not appreciate you posting on our website my personal bill so all could see! This is my private information you have shown." The invoice did not show her actual name, just the name and address of her business which is public, along with a description of the work done and the amount owed. Anyone familiar with PIPEDA and crap like that in Canada? She's a loser that got canned from her last job and is struggling to keep her restaurant open, so I doubt she has money for a lawyer, as long as they don't take cases like this on contingency. If she thinks she could get a payday I'm sure she would pursue it though, since they are extremely hard up for cash with a failing business in a location where 3 previous owners have failed doing the same thing. |
They paid you, you won, who cares?
|
Quote:
Just finished selling something on ebay and now dealing with a non-paying bidder. Googled the guy's name and address and turns out he's a convicted fraudster as well, owing a motel over $17000. Just my luck. |
All of this whining and harassing them on facebook over a measly 67 bucks. You sound like a deadbeat yourself.
|
Quote:
Do you do work for someone then don't care if you are paid? If so, you are a fucking moron. And posting one post on facebook asking to be paid is hardly harassing (and it worked). And it took exactly the same amount of time that you took to post your worthless post in this thread. By your logic, you must also be a deadbeat. |
Quote:
I fancy getting 67 bucks of free shirt myself. |
Quote:
Therefore you shouldn't be too worried about a lawsuit because it's a waste of time and money suing someone that would worry about an outstanding $70 bill. However congratulations on getting your money. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wasn't worried about the money because I needed it to buy formula for my starving children, I'm just growing increasingly tired of people that don't pay their bills and I see no reason to let them slide. If you've seen any of my posts on here where I show pics of my house or vehicles, you can plainly see I'm not in the poor house. |
I think this lackadaisical attitude from many I see here and elsewhere is the reason people think they can get away with not paying what they owe. Fuck them. If they owe me $5 I will make sure I collect.
|
You're seriously worried about someone in another country using the very expensive legal system to fight over a (paid...) $70 bill?
c'mon now.. :) |
Quote:
|
Commercial collections law and personal debt collections laws are different in this state -- a business name and a personal name may not have the same protections under privacy laws (in Canada?). I would check that out.
Fuck 'em if they stiff you and ignore any contact. Peer pressure of social media collects debt:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
well facebook page is a communication channel.. you posted a related payment issue on it.. does not sound like an issue..?
|
Quote:
No sense in wasting any more time on it. I must admit it was a satisfying experience though. She sure mailed that cheque fast after my post. :winkwink: |
You won't be sued... but I wouldn't expect any more work for you from that client or anyone who that client does business with in the future.
|
You probably did break the law. I don't know about Canada but here in the US that would violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and possibly other such laws. Since Canada tends to be better overall about consumer protection and privacy I would be shocked if that weren't illegal there.
IANAL but you should either get one if you have a lot to lose or not respond to her at all further regarding the matter. Anything you say could end up being used against you. I believe here the fine is something like $2,000 with the possibility of more if they can show actual damages. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The PIPEDA Does NOT apply to Government institutions to which the Privacy Act applies. Individuals who collect, use, or disclose personal information for personal purpose and use. Organizations which collect, use, or disclose personal information only for the purpose of journalist, art or literary. i suppose someone would take money to argue he isn't an individual and a business.. but for the amount and situation? massive corporations are doing much, much worse. |
Unless you had +500 clients(doubt it) I would not even consider $67.80 "business"
|
Quote:
Just the same if you're loaded with money to the ying-yang. You might want to consider keeping it to yourself. Because if no one knows your rich not only are people reluctant to sue you for something. BUT... you tend to be able to quickly see who your real trust worthy friends are who the know-it-all ass kissers are snifing around for a quick buck. |
Quote:
You wipe your ass with 20 dollar bills right, and shred cheques before cashing them like Jodete.... just because you can. I like how all these people pretend they don't get out of bed unless someone throws a thousand dollar bill at them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act | Federal Trade Commission The regulations only apply to debt collectors and holders in due course (look that one up F. Lee Baily) Quote:
Also, if you are the original creditor, and not an assignee or holder in due course; you are exempted. Owner or Sole Proprietor was omitted -- I would argue that it never was the intention of the regulation -- the word natural person could have been used if that was the intent ... Futhermore, it is a US Federal rule, and as such: the venue would be in the Federal Courts. The case would be dismissed based on no cause for action -- an individual collecting a debt owed to him, using his own identity, or a pseudonym (nickname at Facebook) would be exempt -- the ony triable issue might be if that name was in fact known to the debtor -- obviously it was she paid the debt. Case dismissed Court adjourned Maybe Canadian law is different, but to the best of my knowledge, the privacy laws in Canada (and in the EU) are to do with personally identifiable information, employment records, identity papers. 18 U.S.C §2257 disclosures, without court warrant are illegal under Canadian and European Privacy laws, that I know for fact ... ** added : exception being that person's knowing consent to the disclosure. |
Quote:
Learn from it and move along. It's experience |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
changes things a lot that it wasn't a personal fb page, i must have missed that part of it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Good for you!
Public shaming has been an effective tool since the beginning of time. http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lb...erzpo1_500.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
as to whether she could sue you anyways, of course she could- any idiot can launch a lawsuit. I can't imagine a lawyer taking something like this on contingency though. glad you got paid |
Quote:
|
There is such a thing as "harassment of a debtor" in many countries with specific rules about what you can and cannot do when collecting a debt. Aside from the frequency and time of calls and communications there is also a section involving contact with friends and family of the debtors. You might want to check your State's rules on this.
|
Quote:
Face to face is always easier to talk to someone. But on the Internet it's not always easy to chose the right words or phrases. I find that even using a webcam the Internet is still a very 2 dimensional flat form of communication. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would probably consult with a real attorney rather than consulting with the GFY Bar Association.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc